NASA: The earth slows down its rotation.

[Torch light]

NASA declared the Earth is slowing down, and the Moon is getting away from the Earth.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=5740

But their explanation why and how this happens.. not completely correct.

The Earth is slowing in rotation or spinning: this is true, but more than what they estimate.. so that in 1000 years time it will stop its spinning and become like Mercury now.

And the reason is not exactly like what they said: but the true reason is the core of the Earth becoming colder and colder by time.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Standstill_of_the_Earth_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Standstill_of_the_Earth_

And it is true the Moon is getting somewhat away from the Earth, but their explanation of this observation may not be completely correct.

The reason for this increase in the distance of the Moon from the Earth is because the Earth core has become colder than before, and therefore, its gravity influence on the Moon has decreased.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_the_s
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_the_s

 

[Avro52]

47 thousandths of a second per day.

Like being thrown from a car after it hits a brick wall in super duper slow motion.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

But their explanation why and how this happens.. not completely correct.

What you know about science could be engraved on the head of a nail in a 20 point font. Temperature appears nowhere in any of the equations describing gravitational effects, they depend only on mass and distance, and they work, so you can't be right.

 

[gerryh]

NASA declared the Earth is slowing down, and the Moon is getting away from the Earth.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=5740
But their explanation why and how this happens.. not completely correct.
The Earth is slowing in rotation or spinning: this is true, but more than what they estimate.. so that in 1000 years time it will stop its spinning and become like Mercury now.
And the reason is not exactly like what they said: but the true reason is the core of the Earth becoming colder and colder by time.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Standstill_of_the_Earth_
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#The_Standstill_of_the_Earth_
And it is true the Moon is getting somewhat away from the Earth, but their explanation of this observation may not be completely correct.
The reason for this increase in the distance of the Moon from the Earth is because the Earth core has become colder than before, and therefore, its gravity influence on the Moon has decreased.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_the_s
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Why_the_planet_is_near_or_far_from_the_s

Roflmfao

 

[Jinentonix]

Roflmfao

Don't ya just love it when religitards try to use their books of religion as science books?

 

[Jinentonix]

What you know about science could be engraved on the head of a nail in a 20 point font.

You're still giving him far too much credit for how little he knows about science. :lol:

 

[Avro52]

You're still giving him far too much credit for how little he knows about science. :lol:

According to some science itself is a religion.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

They're wrong.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

You're still giving him far too much credit for how little he knows about science. :lol:

You may be right. It just struck me as I was reading his nonsense that a 0 in 20 point font is about the size of a nail head.

But he's so wrong about so much that we could make the case that he knows less than nothing.

 

[Torch light]

What you know about science could be engraved on the head of a nail in a 20 point font. Temperature appears nowhere in any of the equations describing gravitational effects, they depend only on mass and distance, and they work, so you can't be right.

I said this before: your attitude is one of a follower, not of a criticizer of everything the scientists say; i.e. not everything said in the name of science is true.

So they observe, but their explanation of such observation may be correct or wrong.. in your case you adopt their view regardless it is correct or wrong .. as if they are infallible, while obviously the scientists themselves cannot say they are infallible.

Therefore, your attitude is like a student reading his lectures in order to pass the examination, not the attitude of a criticizer knowing they may be wrong or correct.

I don't refuse the science, and I should state clearly that the interpreter Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly, peace be on his soul, respected the science and scientists, and was eager to observe any new discovery or scientific achievement; i.e. he was never against the science.. but this does not mean he should agree on everything told by scientists, then he and I would then fall in your mistake: the blind adoption of anything told in the name of science.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm
quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm

 

[Torch light]

The interpreter of the Quran was never against science:

What I stressed in the translation of the book The Universe and the Quran, which was more than what the interpreter himself had said.. was only to attract attention to the importance of the Quran statements in telling many things that even scientists themselves have not reached to the true explanation as it is explained in the Quran.

So I put every point where the interpreter did not agree with the present explanation by scientists, I put it between square brackets like these [] like
[The mistake of scientists about Mars]
[The mistake of scientists about Jupiter]
[The mistake of scientists about the origin of earth] etc.

which he himself did not stress so much and did not put it in the same way, while I made it as a title but I was honest in keeping the exact original text as much as I could.

This has led to giving misunderstanding that the interpreter was against the science and against scientists; this certainly is only a misconception.

The man did not object to everything told by the true science; but only he said some remarks about some mistakes said by scientists and they are wrong about it while it is told correctly in the Quran.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm
quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm

 

[Torch light]

You may be right. It just struck me as I was reading his nonsense that a 0 in 20 point font is about the size of a nail head.
But he's so wrong about so much that we could make the case that he knows less than nothing.

I don't claim that I know much, like you know so much, about science and knowledge.

On the other hand, I know that whatever people know and whatever they research and attain to good deal of knowledge, their knowledge (excepting you of course) will only be very trivial in relation to the absolute knowledge and science in general.

In other words, what they don't know is certainly much more than what they know.

This is in the Quran 17: 85, which means:
(And, of the knowledge, you [people] have only been given so little.)

http://quran-ayat.com/pret/17.htm#a17_85
quran-ayat.com/pret/17.htm#a17_85

 

[Torch light]

Example of your attitude concerning this subject:
Mercury stopped its spinning.. anyhow you don't agree that it stopped its axial rotation and that it circles around the sun with one face only facing the sun, as the case with our moon: our moon circles around the earth with only one face facing the earth, the other face or hemisphere is invisible to us on earth.

My point here is: if you were truly scientific and you have the scientific approach, you would then ask yourself: why has Mercury its weird movement? And is it possible that the earth will become like Mercury in the future?

But your desire to contradict everything related to the Quran has blinded you and led you to refuse to consider anything else.

See this in the book The Universe and the Quran:
"We can realize the future standstill of Earth, from the standstill of Mercury and Venus; if we find that Venus does not rotate around itself, then we should know that the turn of the Earth is coming"

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#How_the_Planets_Will_Standstill
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#How_the_Planets_Will_Standstill

 

[gerryh]

Example of your attitude concerning this subject:
Mercury stopped its spinning.. anyhow you don't agree that it stopped its axial rotation and that it circles around the sun with one face only facing the sun, as the case with our moon: our moon circles around the earth with only one face facing the earth, the other face or hemisphere is invisible to us on earth.
My point here is: if you were truly scientific and you have the scientific approach, you would then ask yourself: why has Mercury such situation? And is it possible that the earth will become like Mercury in the future, but your desire to contradict everything related to the Quran has blinded you and led you to refuse to consider anything else.
See this in the book The Universe and the Quran:
"We can realize the future standstill of Earth, from the standstill of Mercury and Venus; if we find that Venus does not rotate around itself, then we should know that the turn of the Earth is coming"
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#How_the_Planets_Will_Standstill
quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#How_the_Planets_Will_Standstill

Still batting 1000. Wrong with both mercury and our moon.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Example of your attitude concerning this subject: Mercury stopped its spinning..

Direct observation shows that it hasn't, but you believe that the Quran and al-Hilly's claims about it trump that. You're more wrong than I could ever possibly be.

 

[Torch light]

Direct observation shows that it hasn't, but you believe that the Quran and al-Hilly's claims about it trump that. You're more wrong than I could ever possibly be.

Suppose Mercury has not stopped its axial rotation, but it is as if had stopped, or at least its movement is bizarre, so why do you insist on this?

Moreover, the Quran does not mention Mercury, and only the interpreter said it (and others also said it), and he is correct, and you are wrong.

This proves my notion about you: your approach is not of one who wants to research and investigate and your approach is not scientific: if scientific you will say it in another way: Mercury moves in an unusual way, different from the rest of the planets.. and I don't think it has stopped like our Moon.

At least you admit that Mercury circles around the sun with only one face facing the sun, the other face is invisible to the sun (and almost invisible to us on Earth until they sent a probe which circled around Mercury and imaged the other side), just like that our Moon shows only one face to Earth, while the other face is invisible to us on Earth.

In addition, your blaspheming about the Quran to disprove the word of God: you go wrong and very wrong which is to your loss, and you are old enough to be wise and see about the future afterlife; i.e. your death hour approaches and you don't know will you live until tomorrow or less or more.

 

[Torch light]

Direct observation shows that it hasn't, but you believe that the Quran and al-Hilly's claims about it trump that. You're more wrong than I could ever possibly be.

So don't be haughty to transgress on the Quran the word of God and on the interpreter, while your science is not that science: at most you may work in mines; had you worked with NASA or had you been a professor in a respected university, what would have you said then?

It may be if you work with NASA or with some respected universities, you will be more modest and answer in a better modest rational way.

 

[Torch light]

Still batting 1000. Wrong with both mercury and our moon.

If in court of justice, your testimony will not be accepted, because you are bigotry blind to deny any true fact.

 

[Avro52]

Take that Dex.....lol!

 

[Torch light]

Had you had any blessing, they would have named you the God's blessing -- an Iraqi proverb.
Literately: (Lo beek khair chan sammok khair Allah) :laughing6: