I thought I would try out by creating a thread on whether people should believe what is written in religious texts.
Obviously if you are a member of a faith, or a group of people that believe in the same thing, then you gain an affinity with this group by saying you believe in the thing that the group believes in.
Now apparently, according to Karen Armstrong: in order to be a religious belief, there has to be an element of supernatural.
Somehow, we started believing in supernatural phenomena when we started believing that people have a spirit that lives even after the person dies; and so on. So basically, if stories are told of these spiriitual forces, then a religion is engaging in myth. And if stories are told implying certain relationships between named objects, such as God the Holy Father, we have metaphor: for example, the relationship of father to child.
So the issue is: why bother believing in anything? Can't we just accept the fact that people die, that fathers and mothers have babies, a cycle of life and death carries on.
Obviously if you are a member of a faith, or a group of people that believe in the same thing, then you gain an affinity with this group by saying you believe in the thing that the group believes in.
Now apparently, according to Karen Armstrong: in order to be a religious belief, there has to be an element of supernatural.
Somehow, we started believing in supernatural phenomena when we started believing that people have a spirit that lives even after the person dies; and so on. So basically, if stories are told of these spiriitual forces, then a religion is engaging in myth. And if stories are told implying certain relationships between named objects, such as God the Holy Father, we have metaphor: for example, the relationship of father to child.
So the issue is: why bother believing in anything? Can't we just accept the fact that people die, that fathers and mothers have babies, a cycle of life and death carries on.