Muslim Outrage

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: RE: Muslim Outrage

FiveParadox said:
Besides, since when do Christians scream every time a Christian commits a crime? Why do we conclude that whenever a Muslim commits a crime, it is a black spot on each and every Muslim?

All those deeds ITN listed at the top of this thread were committed by Muslims claiming to be motivated by, acting in the name of, and in defence of, Islam. Makes a bit of a difference.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
And what of activities committed by the Klu Klux Clan, in the name of a white and protestant United States? Is the general consensus not that they do not reflect true Christianity, and therefore are not associated therewith?
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
 

neallo

New Member
Feb 12, 2006
47
1
8
humanorder.blogspot.com
Wow when I first came here this place seem'd to lean to the left a little but recently it seems to have fallen to the right. A lot of what I am hearing recently almost seems to me as boarder line racism.

the word racism is an excuse when we are talking about facts
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
Re: RE: Muslim Outrage

neallo said:
the word racism is an excuse when we are talking about facts

Facts? If that's the case, what are you then? black? white? oriental, native? comon man tell us what you are so we can give you all sorts of "facts" about who you are.

You see based on these facts, I should be living in a trailor, Greedy & Drunk & Gay. Since I'm White, Scottish, and an artist. However you'd have to tell that to me wife and three kids. And I live in a house.

Racism is in sense holding beliefs on someone based on stereotypes by others that look like him/her. That belief is more commonly a derogatory one, such as all indians are drunks, but it can be more neutral, such as all orientals are good at math, or know karate.

I've seen the racist card as an excuse, and always when it is it's painfully obvious. But not everybody uses it as an excuse.
 

neallo

New Member
Feb 12, 2006
47
1
8
humanorder.blogspot.com
my point in saying that is quite simple. add up the amount of people at all the protests. not to mention hamas winning majority in palistine. its kinda hard to not say its racist when the majorty of the muslim world all lean one way. it then becomes fact.

when a male goes to get car insurance. his rate is higher than a girl. same age, same car, the males is higher.
why? because apparently males crash more than women. yet i havent crashed? now they call this fact. i call it hypocrisy
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
my point in saying that is quite simple. add up the amount of people at all the protests. not to mention hamas winning majority in palistine. its kinda hard to not say its racist when the majorty of the muslim world all lean one way. it then becomes fact.

There's no doubt that there's a bunch of people pissed off with this. I couldn't quite say that it's a majority though when you get 70000 people rioting in pakistan that has a muslem population 10000x that. Plus it's easy to make the crowd look "bigger" on the news. It's very easy to make a crowd of 100 people look like a crowd of 5000.

I'm not ready to distrust every muslem I see. I already know too many. I might be more inclined to be suspicious of a muslem from the 'hot spot' regions, until I talk with the person and see what makes them tick.

Just because there are certain areas in the world favoring a particular leaning doesn't make the Majority of them so. After all I could assume the american gov't sympathizes with the KKK because the Virginia Gov't wants to fly the Union flag.

I find that those particular regions in the world there is more illiteracy, and of course a child knows that you don't have to read to understand a cartoon. However the meaning of the cartoon or art is always up for interpretation. In the Case of Iran and Syria, the educated there are giving their interpretations of the cartoons to the masses. (who then sees them and sees the interpretation that was given to them: in this case, the west hates us)
 

Freethinker

Electoral Member
Jan 18, 2006
315
0
16
Jo Canadian said:
There's no doubt that there's a bunch of people pissed off with this. I couldn't quite say that it's a majority though when you get 70000 people rioting in pakistan that has a muslem population 10000x that. Plus it's easy to make the crowd look "bigger" on the news. It's very easy to make a crowd of 100 people look like a crowd of 5000.

It is significicant numbers that admit to supporting suicide bombings. Unlikely many of the others are moderates either:

http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=8192
73% of Palestinian's supported suicide attacks against USA in Nov. 2000 poll

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=165





How many openly support suicide bombing? More than a tiny fraction.
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Many of the extreamist are living across the boarder in Pakistan and crossing the boarder daily so they can carry out their Suicide Bombings.
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now


Interesting poll. I still cant quite go with the majority thing though. I do agree it's a fair number, but even the population that was cited in that poll the countries involved average out to %34.28571428.... So with the give and take the laws of probablity would show that S-Bombings in the defence of muslemey stuff is about 1/3 on average for the middle easter area (although is seems some places will vary.) Let's just say I won't be going to Beriut anytime soon.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: RE: Muslim Outrage

FiveParadox said:
And what of activities committed by the Klu Klux Clan, in the name of a white and protestant United States? Is the general consensus not that they do not reflect true Christianity, and therefore are not associated therewith?

Okay, what of them? I cannot see how this is relevant or useful. Are you suggesting that the Klan's nefarious activities are on a scale and scope similar to those of fundamentalist Islamic terrorists? That other members of the Christian community do not condemn them? That law enforcement doesn't respond to them?

What I think you've got here is the straw man fallacy, and the fallacy of irrelevance.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
I must disagree, Dexter Sinister[. I do, in fact, see a correlation between the two relationships; in one case, the actions of a few extremist Muslims are being applied as the wishes of mainstream Islam — even where Islamic Associations in Canada protest peacefully, and go further to condemn such extremist expressions.

However, in the case of the Klu Klux Klan, no such automatic application is made. The KKK is an extremist faction of Christianity — why, then, is there no automatic application to mainstream Christianity? Why do we accept that "Oh, it's different, they're only extremists" when it comes to the Klan, but most seem to think "Islam is a hateful and barbaric faith, because of these extremists" when it comes to Muslim extremism?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Not to be overly negative here, but from everything I've been reading in the news, forums, etc. etc. etc., over the last few years, I'm getting more and more of a feeling (no facts here, just feeling) that we're heading for a major clash!

What can we do about it as individuals? Just make friends with our local Muslim communities?
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
I plan to do that, Machjo.

A Muslim friend of mine invited me to his Mosque for their next community meeting kind of thing. In an effort to improve Islamic relations with Canada, they are opening their doors to everyone to learn more about the modern and moderate approach to Islam.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Re: RE: Muslim Outrage

FiveParadox said:
I must disagree, Dexter Sinister[. I do, in fact, see a correlation between the two relationships; in one case, the actions of a few extremist Muslims are being applied as the wishes of mainstream Islam — even where Islamic Associations in Canada protest peacefully, and go further to condemn such extremist expressions.

However, in the case of the Klu Klux Klan, no such automatic application is made. The KKK is an extremist faction of Christianity — why, then, is there no automatic application to mainstream Christianity? Why do we accept that "Oh, it's different, they're only extremists" when it comes to the Klan, but most seem to think "Islam is a hateful and barbaric faith, because of these extremists" when it comes to Muslim extremism?

Dear Five. You might already know from previous posts and threads of mine that I have the utmost respect for Islam, have read theQur'an numerous times with pen and paper in hand, and literally (I'm not kidding here) lived with Muslims for over five years of marriage which eventually broke down partially due to Islamic fanaticism.

I'd received much harassement, my ex-wife had received threats at one stage. We had to move away from Victoria for her security. Why? Because the extremists were dangerous and the oderates were neutral to that. I'm afraid to inform you that among many of Canada's Muslims, extremism and fanaticism is the norm! This is not from newspapers, this is from my own eyes and ears, my own experience.

I will tell you tha most do not know the Qur'an, most have never even read it, and those who have have often read it in Arabic without even understanding its import. One man at a funeral in Victoria began spouting out how if Islam had nukes, the world would respect it more. Many of the Ethiopian Muslim community was there, and didn't think twice about it. And the Ethiopians are generally more moderate than their Arab brethren! Another couple were closet non-Muslims, and had said there were a few such people in Victoria. I haven't even gotten onto Montreal yet, and I'll skip that one for the sake of brevity.

I'm opposed to sensoring Islam or suppressing it or trying to discriminate against immigrants on the basis of religion. But I will tell you that something desperately needs to be done. If the liberals (even I tend to sympathise with the moderate left) want to avoid any suppression of Islamic immigration in Canada, then they definitely need to present viable alternatives to controls over immigration.

What are your alternatives?

From my experience with the Muslim community, one of the main problems is that the leaders are often among the more fanatical elements of the community, with the general Muslim population, among which most moderates are to be found, respecting the "erudition", "education", etc. of the "wise scholars" will generally passively ignore their own ideas (and some of these people are well educated, believe it or not) in favour of accepting those of the "scholars" in order to be in the right with God. So the moderates exist. They might be the majority, but they are a majority (even the educated ones) bowing before extremist clerics, in Canada!

The only way I could see of not controlling Islam while at the same time ensuring Canada's security, would be to break the power of the leadership. And the only way I could see of doing that would be to educate Muslim children about the Qur'an in a more intellectual and academic environment, thus breaking the shackles of dependance upon "the correct interpretation" as given by the clerics.

Yet even that would be a radical step. to actually impose Muslim education to Muslim children in public schools, possibly even against the wishes of the Muslim parents and community which intends on teaching not how to read the Qur'an for oneself, but rather a particular extremist interpretation thereof which controls the entire muslim community from the top, from the clerics themselves. So it would seem we have the option of a radical "left wing" step as presented above, a radical "right wing" step as presented by others concerning controls againstMuslim immigration, the veil, etc., or a centre which simply allows this cancer to continue to grow until it explodes in everybody's face.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Re: RE: Muslim Outrage

FiveParadox said:
I plan to do that, Machjo.

A Muslim friend of mine invited me to his Mosque for their next community meeting kind of thing. In an effort to improve Islamic relations with Canada, they are opening their doors to everyone to learn more about the modern and moderate approach to Islam.

I'm happy to read that. I would strongly encourage you to read teh Qur'an as well. A good translation is that of Reverend J.M Rodwell. Try to buy a copy without footnotes if possible, since ironically enough, though I think his translatin to be the most eloquent, he had translated thr Qur'an primarily for the purpose of discrediting Islam and his footnotes are pretty rediculous overall.

From my experiences though, I'd found that for any serious discussion of Islam with a Muslim one needs to be very familiar with the Qur'an and remember that most if not all Muslims view it as the unerring word of God directly spoken to man. Thus while I'd discourage debate, it's still wise to be familiar with the Qur'an to better understand the way theyr think.

Besides I think it is a beautiful book from which one can learn a lot. It's just a shame that so many Muslim communities in at least the cities I'd been to (and I'd been to a few) had been highjacked by extremism.