More victims alleged in Midland sex abuse case

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,925
3,052
113
More victims alleged in Midland sex abuse case
By Tracy McLaughlin ,Special to QMI Agency First posted: Friday, January 24, 2014 09:30 PM EST | Updated: Friday, January 24, 2014 09:37 PM EST
MIDLAND - OPP investigators have alleged there are eight additional child victims in a sexual assault case that includes accusations of bestiality, conspiracy to kidnap a child and the making of child porn.
Police have also introduced new allegations that some children were drugged before they were sexually assaulted.
Shayne Lund, 22, of Midland has been in custody — along with two of his girlfriends — since last October. He is charged with 110 counts including child sexual assault, making child pornography, conspiring to kidnap and sexual assault a child.
Avery Taylor, 20, of Orillia, is now facing 20 charges while Kathryn Thompson, 19, of Orillia, faces 26 offences. The women had initially faced 16 charges each.
The new allegations against the three accused include administering a noxious substance to children as young as two years old, coercing children to have sex with animals, coercing them to commit voyeurism, and videotaping them in sexual acts.
The mother of one of the children at the centre of the case was outraged to learn of allegations that her preschooler had been drugged.
“I just feel like I’m going to lose my mind,” the mother said, weeping as she spoke to the Toronto Sun outside of court. “This sickens me.”
When the three accused were initially charged last September it was believed that only five children from ages two to five had allegedly been victimized. With the eight additions, there are now 13 complainants. There is a ban on publication of the identities of all victims.
The new allegations against the three include mischief by damaging the bed sheets of a 10-year old and the theft of underwear.
Another alleges Lund forced a 14-year-old girl to perform sexual acts and bestiality with a dog while being videotaped, and then threatened to show the videos to her father if she didn’t provide further sexual favours.
While Lund allegedly acted alone in most of the charges, Taylor or Thompson are accused in many cases of assisting him, or committing the acts on their own.
According to one allegation against the trio, a five-year-old child was blindfolded and tricked into a game of taste-testing, with bowls of chips and a person wearing a strawberry-flavoured condom.
In October, Taylor had a lengthy two-day hearing and was denied bail. Thompson waived her bail and agreed to remain in custody. Lund has not yet had a bail hearing and remains in custody.
Pretrial proceedings are scheduled for Feb. 7.
The Crown has announced that it will be seeking a dangerous offender designation for Lund if there is a conviction. Such a designation can carry an indefinite jail term.
*************
One of Shayne Lund’s alleged victims says she was troubled to learn of the accusations involving small children.
“He went out with a lot of girls,” said the 19-year-old, who was 14 at the time police allege that Lund sexually assaulted her. “But when it comes to children and animals though, he never showed any signs of interest. In fact, he always said he didn’t like kids.”
While most of the new allegations against Lund are from the year 2013, at least two accusations of sexual assault date to 2009 and 2010.
The woman said she met Lund at a time in her life when her self-esteem was very low.
“He preyed on girls with low self-confidence and low self-esteem … that’s when he got to me,” she alleged.
She said at first, Lund was kind to her.
“It was at a time in my life when I needed attention. He made me feel special. He knew exactly what to do and say to make them feel special.”
Lund is now facing 110 charges including sexually assaulting children, administering noxious substance, bestiality, voyeurism, and creating child pornography.
Two of Lund’s girlfriends also face charges. Avery Taylor, 20, of Orillia, is accused of 20 offences and Kathryn Thompson, 19, of Orillia, is facing 26 counts.
The complainant said she knew all three when they were in their early teens and recalled Taylor seemed obsessed with Lund.
“Avery was a really nice person. She was smart — but she had very low self-esteem,” the woman added. “Shayne gave her attention and she thrived on it. She was blind to him.”
Now, years later, she wonders if she should have come forward to police before allegations first appeared. She went to investigators recently with allegations that date to 2009.
“It’s hard thinking that maybe if I had have said something before, some of this could have been avoided.”
Still, she insists she is not a victim, no matter what police call it, adding “I prefer to call myself a survivor.”
More victims alleged in Midland sex abuse case | Ontario | News | Toronto Sun
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
“He preyed on girls with low self-confidence and low self-esteem … that’s when he got to me,” she alleged.
She said at first, Lund was kind to her.
“It was at a time in my life when I needed attention. He made me feel special. He knew exactly what to do and say to make them feel special.”
I don't think most people equate poor home environments with this type of outcome. It all goes together to form a pattern. Tragic.
 

barra

Nominee Member
Dec 28, 2013
96
0
6
I don't think most people equate poor home environments with this type of outcome. It all goes together to form a pattern. Tragic.

Exactly, tragic and very few of those who are so twisted end up with reformation. Which is doubly tragic.

But....He needs to just be put away, because we don't see the same justice for victims of their life long suffering. Many can turn things around after such abuses, but most do not.

Even as a Christian who has researched the healing of the abusers or victims cycles - rarely do abusers of this magnitude turn their lives around.
Many of the victims do not regain a full thriving life. Yes they function and some admirably so. But for many it affects both overtly and subliminally their lives forever. The penalty for such crimes needs to be harsher. Little children who are now mentally and physically altered. It will take lots of work for parents and experts to help those children. Another form of drain on society, that a beautiful child who could be so fully developed gets such a huge setback in life as does their family.

IMHO - Put the perp in jail - for life - at minimum. Why take a chance on ever letting someone like that out of jail. Sad for society, but safer for society to put them away.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Exactly, tragic and very few of those who are so twisted end up with reformation. Which is doubly tragic.

But....He needs to just be put away, because we don't see the same justice for victims of their life long suffering. Many can turn things around after such abuses, but most do not.
I agree. Our level of understanding of long term behaviour modification isn't there yet.

Even as a Christian who has researched the healing of the abusers or victims cycles - rarely do abusers of this magnitude turn their lives around.
As I age, one of the patterns I am noticing is, it's not just about environment, although that is a huge component, it's also about gene pool. Sadly, someone who has inherited bad genes from the pool and then place into a bad environment, isn't going to fair well. That's just reality. People need to be protected from that.

Many of the victims do not regain a full thriving life. Yes they function and some admirably so. But for many it affects both overtly and subliminally their lives forever.
Recovery is possible for some, but depends again on mulitple factors...gene pool, environment, support, the correct counselling for them.

The penalty for such crimes needs to be harsher.
Harsher how? Can you explain this more for me.

Little children who are now mentally and physically altered. It will take lots of work for parents and experts to help those children. Another form of drain on society, that a beautiful child who could be so fully developed gets such a huge setback in life as does their family.
I can't imagine what it would feel like to have been entrusted with the care of an innocent and under my watch have that innocent violated. It is beyond my comprehension how one would deal with that.

IMHO - Put the perp in jail - for life - at minimum. Why take a chance on ever letting someone like that out of jail. Sad for society, but safer for society to put them away.
It won't happen. And we are not at a stage where we can predict future recidivism. One thing is certain, if they are treated like animals and then released they will harm again. And there in lies the dilemma; how to consequence unspeakable perpetration's done to another and yet allow for that individual to again be a part of society. To not allow our need as a society for revenge to overshadow logic is a violation to society in and of itself.
 

barra

Nominee Member
Dec 28, 2013
96
0
6
I agree. Our level of understanding of long term behaviour modification isn't there yet.

As I age, one of the patterns I am noticing is, it's not just about environment, although that is a huge component, it's also about gene pool. Sadly, someone who has inherited bad genes from the pool and then place into a bad environment, isn't going to fair well. That's just reality. People need to be protected from that.

Recovery is possible for some, but depends again on mulitple factors...gene pool, environment, support, the correct counselling for them.

Harsher how? Can you explain this more for me.

It seems to me, that many times I see news reports of 2 or 3 years sentence with early parol at times, one was for a stepfather who claimed to be drunk and not know his actions. Tried to have sex with his 3 year old stepdaughter and smothered her and then tried to hide the body etc. He actually did not get a long sentence at all and was out on the street in a few years. (this was a South Vancouver Island case years ago). In the same newspaper was incident of conviction of theft, which got a 15 year sentence. We see the dichotomy and hypocrisy of a nation when the crime of theft gets stiffer sentences than sex violations against innocents and more often than one might realize. . Money is always more important than children it would appear in many of these cases.
Why would a society or community have a strong requirement for registering known convicted sex offenders when they have been granted parole? - because they may re-offend. If the system was so good, they would not have to worry when letting out sex offenders at all, now would they? I have read some divergent and contradictory reports about the parole of criminals and stats. Why allow those like Midland sex abuse circle get off easy? Their minds were obviously warped to drum up a banded effort against vulnerable children - no hope for those kids - until society does prove that a person will not recommit, keep them in prison to SERVE their penance for a horrendous crime. If the penalty for rape is 10 or 15 years make them server that WHOLE time .


I can't imagine what it would feel like to have been entrusted with the care of an innocent and under my watch have that innocent violated. It is beyond my comprehension how one would deal with that.

It won't happen. And we are not at a stage where we can predict future recidivism. One thing is certain, if they are treated like animals and then released they will harm again. And there in lies the dilemma; how to consequence unspeakable perpetration's done to another and yet allow for that individual to again be a part of society. To not allow our need as a society for revenge to overshadow logic is a violation to society in and of itself.

I don't see it as a need for revenge when justice should prevail. Protecting innocents from offenders or criminals should be paramount, but it seems our society has too many bleeding hearts or budget cuts. They don't see they could save money and repeat criminal at times if they created sufficiently good penal programs for criminals to come out in 10-15 years with a better attitude/behaviour. Predicting recidivism should not enter the equation - even one child raped by a criminal out on parole or early release is one too many. They did the crime, they need to serve their full time. Bottom line, I think our children need more protection than the criminal.