that's great, but it's not really sustainable on the earth's ecosystems.
Considering it's primarily a natural event, I'm not exactly sure what you think can seriously be done about it. The Earth has amply demonstrated throughout its history that nature has no problem pushing the reset button on life and she has a variety of ways to do it. Climate change is and has been one of those ways.
On top of everything else, the West isn't so much doing something about the problem as shifting the burden to developing and third world countries. So the net effect on GHG emissions would be negligible,
at best.
Someone on a different forum described it this way. Let's say both you and I have fire pits in our backyards because we both like to have backyard fires. Now, let's assume that you only have a fire maybe once or twice a week because you don't have ready, steady access to firewood while I have all the firewood I can handle, so I have a fire almost every night.
Then one day I decide that backyard fires are bad for the environment and quit having them, BUT I grant you access to my firewood supply and you decide to have a fire almost every night.
While I can honestly state that I've cut down on my personal GHG emissions, I haven't really actually reduced the number being produced since you are now burning the firewood I would have burned if I hadn't stopped.