Lower voting age to 16?

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,808
3,556
113
Canada should follow U.K.’s move to lower voting age to 16, says senator
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Catherine Morrison
Published Jul 23, 2025 • 3 minute read

OTTAWA — Now that the British government has vowed to lower its voting age to 16 by the next general election, one Canadian senator says it’s past time for Canada to do the same.


The U.K. announced last week that it would lower its voting age from 18 to 16 in a bid to strengthen British democracy and restore trust in politics.


Sen. Marilou McPhedran said the issue has been her “top parliamentary priority” since she joined the Red Chamber. She said lowering the voting age to 16 would be good for democracy and that the only arguments against it are “based on stereotypes.”

McPhedran said decisions being made in Canada now will affect younger generations and that extending voting rights to younger people is “logical” and “about fairness.” She added that about a third of 16-year-olds in Canada have some form of employment and are already taxpayers.

Sixteen-year-old Jaden Braves and the organization he leads, Young Politicians of Canada, want to see the federal voting age lowered to 16. He told The Canadian Press that Canada “has to stop living in the shadow of other countries’ innovation that’s progressing faster than ours.”


“I think we need to stop being the country that waits for somebody else to take leadership on something we clearly have the chance to progress forward on,” he said. “Hopefully we’ll learn some lessons soon.”

Braves lamented the many bills that have been introduced in Canada over the past 20 years to lower the voting age that ultimately failed to pass.

McPhedran’s most recent bill to lower the federal voting age to 16 was introduced at the end of May. She said it’s her priority to get it to second reading and into committee when Parliament resumes in September.

“What happened last time was prorogation and an election,” she said.

Prorogation killed the bill after it reached second reading in the Senate.

“But this time our push is to ensure that young voices, young leaders are heard directly by senators, and I feel quite confident that when that happens, skeptics will turn around,” McPhedran added.


McPhedran said she thinks what’s happening in the U.K. will “make a difference” for a number of senators as she continues to push the bill forward.

During debates on previous bills, some senators and MPs have pushed back against arguments in favour of lowering the voting age, such as the suggestion that it would increase voter turnout. Some have also questioned the maturity of youth to cast an informed ballot and debated what standards should be used to justify whether to lower the voting age.

Britain’s voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries quickly followed suit; Canada lowered its voting age to 18 in 1970.

Several countries already have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. Scotland and Wales allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in local and regional elections.


Michael Wigginton, a post-doctoral fellow in political science at Carleton University, said the U.K. government’s decision represents a “fairly natural progression,” coming a decade after Scotland started allowing 16-year-olds to vote for members of the Scottish Parliament and in municipal elections.

“Having that sort of local example to point to makes it easier for both politicians and the public at large to feel comfortable that the reform can work for the U.K. Parliament and not have negative effects,” said Wigginton.

Efforts are being made across Canada to lower the voting age.

In 2021, young Canadians filed an application at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to challenge the voting age, arguing that the Canada Elections Act is in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and is unconstitutional.


Toronto recently passed a motion allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in polls at the neighbourhood level on planning and policy issues. And a provincial committee looking at ways to boost democratic engagement in B.C. is examining a lower voting age.

Wigginton said that while he doesn’t expect Canada to immediately adopt a voting age of 16, having the U.K. as an example will “definitely push the issue into the spotlight more and increase the chances of it happening it the future.”

“What I see is most likely is that one or more provinces will adopt a lower voting age first and then the federal government may eventually follow suit,” he said.

— With files from The Associated Press
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,808
3,556
113
Canada should follow U.K.’s move to lower voting age to 16, says senator
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Catherine Morrison
Published Jul 23, 2025 • 3 minute read

OTTAWA — Now that the British government has vowed to lower its voting age to 16 by the next general election, one Canadian senator says it’s past time for Canada to do the same.


The U.K. announced last week that it would lower its voting age from 18 to 16 in a bid to strengthen British democracy and restore trust in politics.


Sen. Marilou McPhedran said the issue has been her “top parliamentary priority” since she joined the Red Chamber. She said lowering the voting age to 16 would be good for democracy and that the only arguments against it are “based on stereotypes.”

McPhedran said decisions being made in Canada now will affect younger generations and that extending voting rights to younger people is “logical” and “about fairness.” She added that about a third of 16-year-olds in Canada have some form of employment and are already taxpayers.

Sixteen-year-old Jaden Braves and the organization he leads, Young Politicians of Canada, want to see the federal voting age lowered to 16. He told The Canadian Press that Canada “has to stop living in the shadow of other countries’ innovation that’s progressing faster than ours.”


“I think we need to stop being the country that waits for somebody else to take leadership on something we clearly have the chance to progress forward on,” he said. “Hopefully we’ll learn some lessons soon.”

Braves lamented the many bills that have been introduced in Canada over the past 20 years to lower the voting age that ultimately failed to pass.

McPhedran’s most recent bill to lower the federal voting age to 16 was introduced at the end of May. She said it’s her priority to get it to second reading and into committee when Parliament resumes in September.

“What happened last time was prorogation and an election,” she said.

Prorogation killed the bill after it reached second reading in the Senate.

“But this time our push is to ensure that young voices, young leaders are heard directly by senators, and I feel quite confident that when that happens, skeptics will turn around,” McPhedran added.


McPhedran said she thinks what’s happening in the U.K. will “make a difference” for a number of senators as she continues to push the bill forward.

During debates on previous bills, some senators and MPs have pushed back against arguments in favour of lowering the voting age, such as the suggestion that it would increase voter turnout. Some have also questioned the maturity of youth to cast an informed ballot and debated what standards should be used to justify whether to lower the voting age.

Britain’s voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries quickly followed suit; Canada lowered its voting age to 18 in 1970.

Several countries already have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. Scotland and Wales allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in local and regional elections.


Michael Wigginton, a post-doctoral fellow in political science at Carleton University, said the U.K. government’s decision represents a “fairly natural progression,” coming a decade after Scotland started allowing 16-year-olds to vote for members of the Scottish Parliament and in municipal elections.

“Having that sort of local example to point to makes it easier for both politicians and the public at large to feel comfortable that the reform can work for the U.K. Parliament and not have negative effects,” said Wigginton.

Efforts are being made across Canada to lower the voting age.

In 2021, young Canadians filed an application at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to challenge the voting age, arguing that the Canada Elections Act is in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and is unconstitutional.


Toronto recently passed a motion allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in polls at the neighbourhood level on planning and policy issues. And a provincial committee looking at ways to boost democratic engagement in B.C. is examining a lower voting age.

Wigginton said that while he doesn’t expect Canada to immediately adopt a voting age of 16, having the U.K. as an example will “definitely push the issue into the spotlight more and increase the chances of it happening it the future.”

“What I see is most likely is that one or more provinces will adopt a lower voting age first and then the federal government may eventually follow suit,” he said.

— With files from The Associated Press
it should be changed to 21. 💡 🗳️ ☑️
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,044
10,985
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Regardless of the voting age, I’m still am amazed at how many people I speak to that bring up politics on their own, and their knowledge based on the subject is almost nonexistent.

Perhaps age isn’t the best determining factor, but some kind of quiz to see if they’ve read a newspaper in the last decade, or can name more than five politicians in their own nation, or even just a cursory knowledge of what’s happening beyond out of context headlines around them???

It’s really scary how uninformed and borderline ignorant most people are with respect to politics. I’m not saying somebody has to have the same opinion as me because that would be boring, but at least know some basics if you’re gonna have an opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,196
9,450
113
Washington DC
Regardless of the voting age, I’m still am amazed at how many people I speak to that bring up politics on their own, and their knowledge based on the subject is almost nonexistent.

Perhaps age isn’t the best determining factor, but some kind of quiz to see if they’ve read a newspaper in the last decade, or can name more than five politicians in their own nation, or even just a cursory knowledge of what’s happening beyond out of context headlines around them???

It’s really scary how uninformed and borderline ignorant most people are with respect to politics. I’m not saying somebody has to have the same opinion as me because that would be boring, but at least know some basics if you’re gonna have an opinion.
Nope. Any qualification system would be corrupt exactly 6.13 nanoseconds after it was implemented.

We had that here for a while. We found that White people would be given a passage from McGuffy's Reader (a popular beginning reading text) to read and answer questions on, while non-White people would be given Shakespeare or the more obscure portions of the Declaration of Independence. And the failure to answer in a letter-perfect recitation of the "correct" answer meant you couldn't vote. Higher failure rates among non-Whites were attributed to their lower intelligence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,196
9,450
113
Washington DC
Ok. I could see that happening. I’m still blown away by how uninformed the average person is though.
The founders of popular elections, mostly in the UK and the U.S., had a pretty good idea. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, that is.

Still and all. . .

No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
--Winston Churchill
i assume that as voters age they become older and wiser.
I know far too many fucking idiots in their 40s, 50s, and above to make any such assumption.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,513
8,118
113
B.C.
The founders of popular elections, mostly in the UK and the U.S., had a pretty good idea. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, that is.

Still and all. . .

No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
--Winston Churchill

I know far too many fucking idiots in their 40s, 50s, and above to make any such assumption.
My only problem is do we want 16year olds to be complete adults with the right to drink , take on debt and join the military ? All will be on the table if they get the vote .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,044
10,985
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
My only problem is do we want 16year olds to be complete adults with the right to drink , take on debt and join the military ? All will be on the table if they get the vote .
Not necessarily, but by the same token without having the life experience to make informed decisions, that’s the reason why they’re considered children until… depending on that subject, 18 or 19 or 21.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,196
9,450
113
Washington DC
My only problem is do we want 16year olds to be complete adults with the right to drink , take on debt and join the military ? All will be on the table if they get the vote .
Maybe in Canada. In the U.S., you can enlist in the military at 17, vote at 18, drink at 18 or 21, depending on the state, and take on debt at any age, though there are laws and rules of law that limit the amount and type of debt that you can be held liable for.

I take it by "on the table" you mean there will be people pushing for those things? So what?
 

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,057
2,842
113
I can just see how this will go down in our socialist run education system.
Teacher: Class, tomorrow is election day. Anyone wishing to pass will provide proof they voted for their NDP candidate.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,513
8,118
113
B.C.
Maybe in Canada. In the U.S., you can enlist in the military at 17, vote at 18, drink at 18 or 21, depending on the state, and take on debt at any age, though there are laws and rules of law that limit the amount and type of debt that you can be held liable for.

I take it by "on the table" you mean there will be people pushing for those things? So what?
17, 18 and 21 aren’t 16 last I looked .
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,196
9,450
113
Washington DC
I do like the bigoted thinking in this thread. Just like everywhere else.

Sixteen-year-olds on average are less "wise" than eighteen-year-olds. Therefore, sixteen-year-olds should be uniformly banned from voting, and 18-year-olds should be uniformly permitted to vote.

Anybody who subscribes to such "thinking" should not be allowed to vote.