LILLEY: Team Trudeau appointing family, friends and donors as judges ... again!

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,871
3,573
113
LILLEY: Team Trudeau appointing family, friends and donors as judges ... again!
Brian Lilley
Published:
July 2, 2019
Updated:
July 2, 2019 6:14 PM EDT
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks during Canada Day festivities on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada July 1, 2019. Patrick Doyle / Reuters
Justice is supposed to be blind.
Regardless of who you are, rich or poor, well educated or not, we are all supposed to be treated equally when appearing before a judge.
Statues outside of courthouses often portray Lady Justice wearing a blindfold, symbolizing she judges without seeing who you are.
Well, what about the appointment of judges?
Turns out the Liberal Party of Canada looks very closely to make sure not only that judges are competent and qualified, but are also donors, neighbours or friends of the powerful.
Maybe even a relative.
LILLEY: Time’s up for Dean French
LILLEY: Dean French appointments were a bad example, nothing more
KINSELLA: Liberals jumping ship as S.S. Trudeau cruises towards proverbial iceberg
BONOKOSKI: Top Trudeau Liberals, including PM, strangers to ethics
Tuesday morning, CBC broke a story that 5 out of the last 6 judicial appointments in New Brunswick went to people with close, personal connections to one of Justin Trudeau’s most trusted cabinet ministers Dominic Leblanc.
Those appointments include a “neighbour, a LeBlanc family relation and three lawyers who helped retire debts from his unsuccessful 2008 leadership bid.”
Nice work if you can get it — a judicial appointment is not only a nicely paid gig, it’s pretty much a job for life.
You really have to screw up to get fired from that job.
Of course, those appointments came hot on the heels of some rather generous donations to the Liberal Party.
In the past, Justice Minister David Lametti denied making judicial appointments based on who donates to the Liberal Party, and his office has done so again in this case.
“All judicial appointments are made on the basis of merit,” Lametti’s spokeswoman Rachel Rappaport said in a statement.
Excuse me if I have trouble believing them.
In April it was reported by the Globe and Mail that judicial appointments were being screened by the prime minister’s office through a party database of donors before appointments were made.
Candidates were even designated as ‘supporters’ if they had donated and been involved with the party sufficiently.
In their investigation, the Globe looked through the 289 judicial appointments made by the Trudeau government and then matched them to Elections Canada donations records.
“Over all, 1,187 contributions were matched to 83 judges — nearly one in three of those appointed. Seventy-five judges, or 90.4% of all judges who made donations, gave to the Liberal Party or its candidates,” the Globe reported.
Compare that to just nine judges that donated to the Conservatives, eight to the NDP and one to the Greens.
Look, I get that parties in power get to appoint whoever they like for positions ranging from judges to boards and commissions, ambassadors and more.
But this isn’t what Justin Trudeau promised.
Trudeau promised not to do this — he pledged merit based appointments.
And what do we keep getting? Liberal Party donors or failed candidates.
“Our country is stronger, and our government more effective, when decision makers reflect Canada’s diversity,” the Liberals said in their 2015 election platform.
“We will also adopt a new government-wide appointment process that is open and based on merit.”
Apparently, diversity for the Liberals means 90% Liberal donors.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford recently lost his chief of staff over a series of bad patronage appointments.
French resigned in the middle of the controversy.
This is far worse than that.
We aren’t talking about a party hack getting a plum appointment where they can do no real harm, we are talking about judges.
We are talking about people who cast judgements on murder cases, assault charges, divorce and family law — and those jobs are going to party donors, friends, neighbours and family?
Canadians deserve better than this, and they deserve some real answers from Justin Trudeau.
http://torontosun.com/opinion/colum...ing-family-friends-and-donors-as-judges-again
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
and when Ford does it everyone complains.
As well they should. But when Groper does it you look for other people to whine about instead, thus giving Groper yet another free pass on stuff that would have you howling for blood if done by a Conservative.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,871
3,573
113
LILLEY: Trudeau government slips on ethics again
Brian Lilley
Published:
July 3, 2019
Updated:
July 3, 2019 7:37 PM EDT
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau adjusts his tie as he leaves a cabinet meeting on route to vote in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, April 9, 2019.Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS
We have an ethically challenged federal government, no one can deny that.
Our prime minister has been found in violation of ethics law violations as have several of his cabinet ministers.
Now another report showing that judges have been appointed based at least in part on their ties to the Liberal Party or key Liberal cabinet ministers.
How much more can we take?
We know this government is not against meddling with the justice system, we saw that in both the SNC-Lavalin scandal where the attorney general was urged to give the politically connected company a sweetheart deal to avoid bribery and corruption charges.
Electoral considerations, including Trudeau’s own re-election as a Quebec MP were raised to try and force the issue.
“I am an MP in Quebec, the member for Papineau,” Trudeau told then attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould.
Meanwhile top Trudeau advisors pushed Wilson-Raybould using the election as a reason to change a justice department decision.
“We can have the best policy in the world but we need to get re-elected,” Wilson-Raybould quoted Trudeau’s senior advisor, Mathieu Bouchard, as saying.
We also saw the Trudeau Liberals interfere in the Mark Norman case.
The Vice Admiral had his name dragged through the mud, the PMO and his top officials in the Privy Council Office took intense interest in prosecuting this Navy hero, so much so that they were found discussing trial strategy with prosecutors.
So when we find out that five of the last six judicial appoints in New Brunswick have close connections to Liberal cabinet minister and Trudeau confidante Dominic LeBlanc should we really be surprised?
People that were relatives, neighbours and fundraisers for his failed Liberal leadership bid got the appointments.
Tories seek criminal investigation of PM’s trips to Aga Khan’s island
Court orders new look at Aga Khan’s vacation gift to PM
Justice committee ends SNC-Lavalin probe amid opposition howls
EDITORIAL: LeBlanc’s conflict breach goes unpunished
LILLEY: Team Trudeau appointing family, friends and donors as judges … again!
Liberal supporters point out that former Conservative MP and justice minister Peter MacKay had close ties to several judicial appointees in Nova Scotia.
That’s true.
It’s also true that the story was covered and caused headaches for the Conservatives due to the horrible optics.
Should the same not happen here?
Of course this is all compounded by the fact that Trudeau promised to do things differently, to make open and transparent appointments based on merit, not party connections.
That was the promise.
What we got was a system that claims to be transparent but is the same old, same old.
A review of judges appointed by the Liberals showed that of the lawyers appointed to the bench, 90% of those that made donations had donated to the Liberal Party.
Coincidence?
I think not.
This is a government all about looking out for itself and its friends.
When Trudeau himself was busted for violating ethics laws it was for taking a vacation to a private island, the Aga Khan’s island.
This is a man that lobbies the federal government and gets millions of taxpayer dollars.
The Ethics Commissioner found that Trudeau’s claim that he was accepting a gift from a friend didn’t hold true because of his lack of personal interaction with the Aga Khan.
LeBlanc meanwhile was found in violation of the Ethics Act for awarding a lucrative clam fishing licence to a company that included his wife’s cousin.
Now we find other relatives are being appointed judges and the surest way to becoming a judge appears to be donating to the Liberal Party, or being close to LeBlanc, and we are supposed to believe this is a government making decisions based on merit?
Justin Trudeau and his team promised to act differently, they’ve made things worse.
Just another reason they deserve to go in October.

http://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lilley-trudeau-government-slips-on-ethics-again
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Oh OK so yesterday, not to worry there will be a new scandal soon, oh look another leaked communication to Irving who'd a thunk it.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
How about this one?

Ottawa MP broke rules endorsing husband for council

Canada's ethics commissioner says Liberal MP Anita Vandenbeld shouldn't have made robocalls encouraging voters to elect her husband to Ottawa city council last fall.

Some Bay ward residents complained to the commissioner's office after receiving calls from the Ottawa West–Nepean MP in mid-October, days before the election.
In the recorded message, Vandenbeld asked residents to vote for her husband, Don Dransfield, to represent the same general area of the city. Dransfield lost the Oct. 22 election to Theresa Kavanagh.

'nuff said, but there is more in the article if you want to read Hoid.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I was just pulling your leg

nobody cares what you cut and paste.