Re: RE: Knowing and learning
I sure wish I knew what the Hell you're talking about. It sounds like it might mean something, but so far I haven't been able to puzzle it out.
For instance, you say this:
And then you say this:
Don't you see that at best only one of those statements can be true? I'm not going to do a detailed analysis of your lengthy posts here, but there's a lot of confusing inconsistency and vagueness like that in them. You throw around undefined concepts like "the source of all happiness" as if they were commonly understood ideas, and say things about children being in touch with the unknown. If it's unknown, how can anyone be in touch with it?
Actually you lost me with your first post in this thread. I've read enough of your posts to know you're no fool, so I keep looking at this thread and assuming there must be some substance here, but so far it's gone right by me.
I sure wish I knew what the Hell you're talking about. It sounds like it might mean something, but so far I haven't been able to puzzle it out.
For instance, you say this:
china said:Without the brain there is no mind, but the mind is separate from the brain.
And then you say this:
If the brain is limited, damaged, the mind is also damaged.
Don't you see that at best only one of those statements can be true? I'm not going to do a detailed analysis of your lengthy posts here, but there's a lot of confusing inconsistency and vagueness like that in them. You throw around undefined concepts like "the source of all happiness" as if they were commonly understood ideas, and say things about children being in touch with the unknown. If it's unknown, how can anyone be in touch with it?
Actually you lost me with your first post in this thread. I've read enough of your posts to know you're no fool, so I keep looking at this thread and assuming there must be some substance here, but so far it's gone right by me.