Judge tosses convicted B.C. polygamists' constitutional challenge - British Columbia - CBC News
I agree that Canada should refuse to recognize a polygamous marriage contracted on Canadian soil, but I think it should still recognize a polygamous marriage that is contracted abroad.
As for punishment, I think all the state needs to do is to just not recognize the validity of any polygamous marriage contracted in Canada. That avoids any prison costs to the taxpayer and such.
I recognize that that leaves a loophole allowing a person to contract a polygamous marriage abroad and then to return to Canada with the papers. In practical terms though, I think that however harmful polygamy may be to society, forcibly breaking such a marriage causes even more harm than it solves. I think we need to put it into perspective too.
Then there's this:
'His lawyer, Blaire Suffredine, argued that the unions were never legal marriages, but common-law relationships sanctioned by Blackmore's church, and carry no legal weight.'
If the issue has to do with child molestation, then why not deal with it on those laws?
I agree that Canada should refuse to recognize a polygamous marriage contracted on Canadian soil, but I think it should still recognize a polygamous marriage that is contracted abroad.
As for punishment, I think all the state needs to do is to just not recognize the validity of any polygamous marriage contracted in Canada. That avoids any prison costs to the taxpayer and such.
I recognize that that leaves a loophole allowing a person to contract a polygamous marriage abroad and then to return to Canada with the papers. In practical terms though, I think that however harmful polygamy may be to society, forcibly breaking such a marriage causes even more harm than it solves. I think we need to put it into perspective too.
Then there's this:
'His lawyer, Blaire Suffredine, argued that the unions were never legal marriages, but common-law relationships sanctioned by Blackmore's church, and carry no legal weight.'
If the issue has to do with child molestation, then why not deal with it on those laws?