John Lennon Portfolio

mapleleafgirl

Electoral Member
Dec 13, 2006
864
12
18
35
windsor,ontario
John Lennon Portfolio

John Winston Lennon was born in Liverpool on October 9, 1940, during the height of WWII, his father, Fred Lennon, off at sea. His father didn't turn up again until five years later, and when he did he tried to take john away from his mother, Julia, when she refused to restart her life with him. Instead, he grew up in the Liverpool suburb of Woolton, with his Aunt Mimi and Uncle George Smith, at 251 Menlove Ave, which became nicknamed Mendips. Julia died in 1958, in an automobile accident practically in front of Mendips, when John was seventeen.
Aunt Mimi ran a very strict household. John very quickly became bored at school, preferring drawing and writing about his classmates and teachers rather than his studies. Rebellious at an early age, he had a very rough school history, sagging off from school (going AWOL from classes) and petty stealing. His future looked bleak until Mimi got the headmaster of the Quarrybank school to write a letter of recommendation for John to the Liverpool Art College, because of his drawings.

It was at Liverpool Art College, in 1956, a friend played him Elvis' Heartbreak Hotel, and John's musical interest was piqued. Then he heard Lonnie Donegan's Rock Island Line on Radio Luxembourg, and became part of the new Skiffle craze by begging his Aunt Mimi until she broke down and bought him a guitar, although she forever told him he would never get anywhere with it. He had already learned to play the harmonica during his childhood, and he taught himself the guitar by applying banjo chords that his mother had taught him.

In 1955 he started his own band, the Quarrymen, with his long time pal and fellow troublemaker Pete Shotton, singing all the popular songs, sometimes making up the words when he couldn't get them all off the radio. Also in the Quarrymen were Nigel Walley and Ivan Vaughan, the rest of John's gang. It was Ivan Vaughan who introduced John to his friend, Paul McCartney, in 1957.

John married his girlfriend of four years, Cynthia Powell, in 1962. She was pregnant with their son Julian at the time, who was born in April, 1963.





In His Own Words

About his time in art school, John said:
"My whole school life was a case of 'I couldn't care less'. It was just a joke as far as I was concerned. Art was the only thing I could do, and my headmaster told me that if I didn't go to art school I might as well give up life. I wasn't really keen. I thought it would be a crowd of old men, but I should make the effort and make something of myself. I stayed for five years doing commercial art. Frankly, I found it all as bad as maths and science. And I loathed those. The funny thing was I didn't even pass art in the GCE. I spent the exam time doing daft cartoons. I got into art school by doing some decent stuff and taking it along to show them."
On musical differences:
"From our earliest days in Liverpool, George and I on the one hand and Paul on the other had different musical tastes. Paul preferred 'pop type' music and we preferred what is now called 'underground'. This may have led to arguments, particularly between Paul and George, but the contrast in tastes, I'm sure, did more good than harm, musically speaking, and contributed to our success."
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Hmmm, given Lennon's virtual lack of academic ability do you think maybe most of his stuff was ghost written? Seems strange to me that a person with such obvious talent and success should be so daft at the basics. Guess we need an investigation!
 

mapleleafgirl

Electoral Member
Dec 13, 2006
864
12
18
35
windsor,ontario
Hmmm, given Lennon's virtual lack of academic ability do you think maybe most of his stuff was ghost written? Seems strange to me that a person with such obvious talent and success should be so daft at the basics. Guess we need an investigation!

well him and paul were artists and geniuses and i dont think you need to have a piece of paper when you have a god given talent that is natural.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
True, but given Lennon's ability on paper it should have appeared naturally in class. He seems to have been a dud. Hmmmmmmmm,,, wonder why?
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
True, but given Lennon's ability on paper it should have appeared naturally in class. He seems to have been a dud. Hmmmmmmmm,,, wonder why?

dyslexia can make school work incredibly difficult, while not impairing musical genius in any way. but, even without a learning disorder like that, people can often be brilliant in one area, and suck at all the rest. musical genius is the best example of that. everyone's brains have different strengths.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
True, but given Lennon's ability on paper it should have appeared naturally in class. He seems to have been a dud. Hmmmmmmmm,,, wonder why?

Not necessarily. Many artists do poorly in school for a variety of reasons. In John's case, he often stated that school bored him. Further, his teachers knew he was brilliant and despaired that he seemed to put no effort into his school work. School, in general, is not a litmus test for intelligence. The system is geared to the norm, and often those too intelligent or slow are lost in the shuffle.
 

mapleleafgirl

Electoral Member
Dec 13, 2006
864
12
18
35
windsor,ontario
Not necessarily. Many artists do poorly in school for a variety of reasons. In John's case, he often stated that school bored him. Further, his teachers knew he was brilliant and despaired that he seemed to put no effort into his school work. School, in general, is not a litmus test for intelligence. The system is geared to the norm, and often those too intelligent or slow are lost in the shuffle.

for sure sanctus. what does doing good in school have to do with being a genius anyway?
 

csanopal

Electoral Member
Dec 22, 2006
225
5
18
Toronto, ON
True, but given Lennon's ability on paper it should have appeared naturally in class. He seems to have been a dud. Hmmmmmmmm,,, wonder why?


I disagree. Talent would not necessarily be seen at school if he didn't share it with his teachers.Plus, they would have maybe not recognized his brilliance if he didn't fit into the stereotype of what they thought was good writing. Read his history, he was writing since a kid, and the teachers must have known this. Further, his talent is what encouraged one of his teachers to promote him to the College of Art in Liverpool.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
It's all a big mystery. School can certainly be a bore for many. The boredom is administrative driven as talking heads on top try to regulate the beast to death. But usually gifted folk don't have to work much at school anyway. It comes naturally. Given Lennon lived at a time when the school system depended on tests and not the drudgery of project work he should have been in his element. He should have been flying simply by the fact of getting up in the morning and attending. Maybe the rumour was right years ago - there was more to the Beatles than what we were allowed to see. Maybe Lennon was a frontman for someone else. Who?
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
But usually gifted folk don't have to work much at school anyway. It comes naturally.

To people who are intellectually gifted, school may come naturally yes. but musical giftedness and intellectual giftedness are two different things. different brain pathways are involved in music than are involved in academia.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Certainly, Karrie, but there are so many intersections that they can't be ignored. It's all beginning to make sense - why would Lennon, a supposedly top talent of his generation, get involved with a classless act like Yoko Ono? Perhaps he was killed on that tragic day in New York by a perp who was paid to keep the secret that Lennon himself felt he could no longer ignore. Oh, the darkness deepens.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
46
Newfoundland!
often people dont shine at school, not because they lack the ability but because the lack the motivation. I did badly at school but i am a genius
 

MagnoliaApples

Electoral Member
Apr 26, 2006
383
0
16
Personally, i have read alot about the Beatles and John Lennon. As a matter of fact, Cynthia Lennon has recently written a book about her life with John and it's simply called 'John'. I thought it was a good book and it exposed what i had already thought about John Lennon from alot of the research i've done on the Beatles.

John Lennon is seen as some sort of humanitarian and I cannot understand why? Yes, he wrote songs about peace and love but what he lived in his own life only makes him look like a total hypocrite. And just because you decide to sit in bed in you're pyjamas in protest of the war and have it broadcast to the world doesn't mean you are doing something!

I don't doubt that he was a genius - Alot of geniuses don't do very good in school. Einstein failed grade 3.
And i certainly don't doubt his song writting. I'm positive he wrote his own material but to regard John Lennon as a role model is a an uneducated mistake. The crap he put Cynthia and his son Julian through was just awful. And the way he treated people was just rude!

Would you consider someone who couldn't stand the sight of , and often made fun of crippled and handicapped people a humanitarian? I certainly don't! And the way he shuned his first son Julian is just heartbreaking and inexcusable considering that he too was abandoned as a young boy by his father. Of all people, he should've known better.

I would encourage anyone to learn the truth about John Lennon. It's worth learning how to recognize false hero's in our society.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
Certainly, Karrie, but there are so many intersections that they can't be ignored. It's all beginning to make sense - why would Lennon, a supposedly top talent of his generation, get involved with a classless act like Yoko Ono? Perhaps he was killed on that tragic day in New York by a perp who was paid to keep the secret that Lennon himself felt he could no longer ignore. Oh, the darkness deepens.

uhmmm, I think Paul, George and Ringo would've noticed if he didn't have talent. Further, what was so classless about Yoko? She was an artist like John, and in fact it can be argued that he ruined, for a time, her career. You should also know that, in terms of society, he married up when he married Yoko. Her family is in the Japanese aristrocracy and at first were stunned that their daughter was involved with an English working class rock star.Mind you, they were already quite shocked that she didn't follow the patterns of people in that level of society:)
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
often people dont shine at school, not because they lack the ability but because the lack the motivation. I did badly at school but i am a genius

Exactly. I did horribly in High School. I could not care less. I didn't shine until University.I think the school system is designed for the average, and anything else struggles to fit in. I found the work boring, the teachers boring and the subjects presented in the most boring fashion possible. As an artist, my only concern was writing, everything else didn't matter at the time.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Sanctus, the Japanese aristocracy was crippled by WWII and any airs it might have earned or had were greatly diminished by its support of the old militaristic society it benefited from. I never understood Lennon's attraction to Ono. Certainly it wasn't her looks or her modest talent. Maybe he found a soulmate in her whatever that might connote. Oh, the darkness deepens... still.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
Sanctus, the Japanese aristocracy was crippled by WWII and any airs it might have earned or had were greatly diminished by its support of the old militaristic society it benefited from. I never understood Lennon's attraction to Ono. Certainly it wasn't her looks or her modest talent. Maybe he found a soulmate in her whatever that might connote. Oh, the darkness deepens... still.


Regardless, the family is blue-blood and maintains that aura about it. Her father and mother were terribly conservative and concious of their social status. Yoko was their rebel child, obviously.

I actually find her very attractive, yes that is what I wrote.

Modest talent? Hmmm..you are obviously influenced by Beatles propaganda, or have not ever been involved in the avant-garde artist world of painters, sculpters and poets. Yoko is heavily influential in that area of art, her work in the 1960's alone still inspiring to a generation of avant-garde artists to this day. She was, and is, a conceptual artist whose work as part of the FLUXUS movement in the early 1960's was highly regarded by her peers, amongst them being Andy Warhol who once wrote that her biggest artistic mistake was getting involved with The Beatles.

I am not saying the woman is a saint, or a good person per se, but I get tired of reading crap that makes her seem as some sort of a monster because she fell in love with one of the fab four. She didn't break up the group either. That was her husbands' doing.

As one of the posters in this thread pointed out, Lennon was not only a great artist, he was also, in truth, an a**hole in terms of his relationships with people around him. From the sidelines, it seemed he was unable to sustain more than one significant relationship at a time. So, when he fell in love with Yoko, out went his creative soul-mate Paul. And that is the story of the Beatles creative fires that fab four fans do not like to consider. The group as a whole was great together, but in essence its creative drive was all about the relationship between its two main songwriters-John and Paul.

And that is what happened when Yoko came along in John's life, he spiritually "dumped" Paul and focused all his attention on his new girlfriend. He also "dumped" his wife and first born son, seemingly without any concious regrets.

Your assertation that he could not have been a great artist because he didn't do well in school is, if truth be told, just silly. School is not the litmus test for intelligence, believe me. Memorizing facts and figures in order to get a piece of paper after a few years does not mark intelligence, it marks conformity more then anything else. The entire educational system even today is not geared to handle artistic genius, or genius in any field for that matter.The structure of the school system is geared to the middle, the average. People like Lennon would, and are, bored in such places. It is not that they are unable to do the work, it is that they are not motivated to do so. Teachers, after a few years, tend to label such students as problems and an entire pyschological battle begins between the student and the system, the system having dismissed the student as a "problem" and the student having dismissed the system as "oppressive". This story has been reapeated for a great many artistic people throughout history. Lennon was certainly not the first to excell in his chosen craft yet fail at academia.

Further, many of his art college teachers considered his drawings and poetry brilliant, but were dismayed because Lennon refused to create and think "inside the box", as it were. He was a rebel, a bright mind and gifted with God given natural talent. One cannot train to be an "artist". You either are one or you are not.

Meeting Paul as a teenager was the best thing that could have happened to him. It gave him a creative soul-mate that went on to write some of the most impressive music of the 20th century.

As I wrote earlier though, on a personal level, John was a failure. His ideas and concepts were good, his ability to translate these into personal relationships dismal. Even Yoko has claimed that in the early days of their relationship he could be abusive and hostile to her.

Your points about what he saw in her are, if you think about it, somewhat typical of Beatles era propaganda who considered her relationship with John a threat to the Beatles empire and status. In short, a potential kick in the butt to their gravy train.

When he was still alive, I used to get quite annoyed with people who bitched about his work with Yoko. He was a grown man. If he wanted to record and do art projects with his wife, so what? You didn't have to buy the records or attend the art exhibits.

In short, Lennon was a brilliant artist. If he wasn't, his peers and the people around him would have noticed. There is no mystery here, no secret person writing his stuff for him behind the scenes. Don't you think Paul, his collaborator, would have noticed if John was unable to create music? The Beatles producer, George Martin, has long stated that of the four John was not only the most creative, but also the most challenging artist of the four to work with.

But as a human being, he was, as I said, a total jerk to the people in his personal life.
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
him behind the scenes. Don't you think Paul, his collaborator, would have noticed if John was unable to create music? The Beatles producer, George Martin, has long stated that of the four John was not only the most creative, but also the most challenging artist of the four to work with.

But as a human being, he was, as I said, a total jerk to the people in his personal life.

It's not just me! Hooray! To be honest, I always admired John and Yoko. Yeah, they may have been aholes at home, etc, but still, they didn't have to take a stand on anything. God knows they didn't need the moneyand it may have damaged their reputations anyway to be so wrapped up in the anti-war movement.

It isn't how they lived their lives that matters ayway, the point is, as they sang so well so long ago "war is over-if you want it"..powerful message!

(Sidenote-ever notice how the prejudice against Yoko always labels HAPPY XMAS as a John Lennon song when the record clearly has both John and Yoko singing on it and is credited as both authors and singers to JOHN AND YOKO LENNON AND THE PLASTIC ONO BAND)
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
It's all a big mystery. School can certainly be a bore for many. The boredom is administrative driven as talking heads on top try to regulate the beast to death. But usually gifted folk don't have to work much at school anyway. It comes naturally. Given Lennon lived at a time when the school system depended on tests and not the drudgery of project work he should have been in his element. He should have been flying simply by the fact of getting up in the morning and attending. Maybe the rumour was right years ago - there was more to the Beatles than what we were allowed to see. Maybe Lennon was a frontman for someone else. Who?

Yeah, that's right. John was a secret agent for the British Counter Intelligence and by the way, Elvis is still alive and shacking up with Marilyn Monroe next door to Janis Joplin...right down the street from Jim Morrison. :)

(I hear Harrison will be moving in soon)
 

mapleleafgirl

Electoral Member
Dec 13, 2006
864
12
18
35
windsor,ontario
Regardless, the family is blue-blood and maintains that aura about it. Her father and mother were terribly conservative and concious of their social status. Yoko was their rebel child, obviously.

I actually find her very attractive, yes that is what I wrote.

Modest talent? Hmmm..you are obviously influenced by Beatles propaganda, or have not ever been involved in the avant-garde artist world of painters, sculpters and poets. Yoko is heavily influential in that area of art, her work in the 1960's alone still inspiring to a generation of avant-garde artists to this day. She was, and is, a conceptual artist whose work as part of the FLUXUS movement in the early 1960's was highly regarded by her peers, amongst them being Andy Warhol who once wrote that her biggest artistic mistake was getting involved with The Beatles.

I am not saying the woman is a saint, or a good person per se, but I get tired of reading crap that makes her seem as some sort of a monster because she fell in love with one of the fab four. She didn't break up the group either. That was her husbands' doing.

As one of the posters in this thread pointed out, Lennon was not only a great artist, he was also, in truth, an a**hole in terms of his relationships with people around him. From the sidelines, it seemed he was unable to sustain more than one significant relationship at a time. So, when he fell in love with Yoko, out went his creative soul-mate Paul. And that is the story of the Beatles creative fires that fab four fans do not like to consider. The group as a whole was great together, but in essence its creative drive was all about the relationship between its two main songwriters-John and Paul.

And that is what happened when Yoko came along in John's life, he spiritually "dumped" Paul and focused all his attention on his new girlfriend. He also "dumped" his wife and first born son, seemingly without any concious regrets.

Your assertation that he could not have been a great artist because he didn't do well in school is, if truth be told, just silly. School is not the litmus test for intelligence, believe me. Memorizing facts and figures in order to get a piece of paper after a few years does not mark intelligence, it marks conformity more then anything else. The entire educational system even today is not geared to handle artistic genius, or genius in any field for that matter.The structure of the school system is geared to the middle, the average. People like Lennon would, and are, bored in such places. It is not that they are unable to do the work, it is that they are not motivated to do so. Teachers, after a few years, tend to label such students as problems and an entire pyschological battle begins between the student and the system, the system having dismissed the student as a "problem" and the student having dismissed the system as "oppressive". This story has been reapeated for a great many artistic people throughout history. Lennon was certainly not the first to excell in his chosen craft yet fail at academia.

Further, many of his art college teachers considered his drawings and poetry brilliant, but were dismayed because Lennon refused to create and think "inside the box", as it were. He was a rebel, a bright mind and gifted with God given natural talent. One cannot train to be an "artist". You either are one or you are not.

Meeting Paul as a teenager was the best thing that could have happened to him. It gave him a creative soul-mate that went on to write some of the most impressive music of the 20th century.

As I wrote earlier though, on a personal level, John was a failure. His ideas and concepts were good, his ability to translate these into personal relationships dismal. Even Yoko has claimed that in the early days of their relationship he could be abusive and hostile to her.

Your points about what he saw in her are, if you think about it, somewhat typical of Beatles era propaganda who considered her relationship with John a threat to the Beatles empire and status. In short, a potential kick in the butt to their gravy train.

When he was still alive, I used to get quite annoyed with people who bitched about his work with Yoko. He was a grown man. If he wanted to record and do art projects with his wife, so what? You didn't have to buy the records or attend the art exhibits.

In short, Lennon was a brilliant artist. If he wasn't, his peers and the people around him would have noticed. There is no mystery here, no secret person writing his stuff for him behind the scenes. Don't you think Paul, his collaborator, would have noticed if John was unable to create music? The Beatles producer, George Martin, has long stated that of the four John was not only the most creative, but also the most challenging artist of the four to work with.

But as a human being, he was, as I said, a total jerk to the people in his personal life.

wow...you must be a beatles fan to know all that stuff. was he really a jerk in real life?