Is it okay to be white?
- Thread starter White_Unifier
- Start date
That might be the reason why you get so many things f**ked up! Perhaps you can send me the list of words and phrases that are acceptable, so I don't piss you off in the future!You object to "methinks" but you have no qualms about using the term "idiot boy"! You ARE F**Ked!
I don't object to 'methinks'. I simply pointed out that most of those who use this archaic phrase reveal themselves to be assholes. Certainly you didn't take long.
Lesson learnt. I still oppose anti-white prejudice; but I must say that while I still don't accept it, I can certainly understand it better now. At least a few non-whites are bound to get a little tired of all the white supremacists and so overreact to it. I guess here's my response:
It's okay to be white, but open the borders already!
What was wrong with it? Oh, it was flamebait, sure, the way it was put. But the gist of it was that whites are responsible for most of the world's scientific and social development, and built the kind of prosperous societies all the rest of the world envies and wants to live in.
No, they don't, useless!!
I'll employ you to check my iPad "S'S, it's about all you're good for eh
again, RCS posted a bunch of stuff "non white" societies have contributed to the sciences, and once again, you choose to ignore like a good little racist.
I prefer Hong Kong to Toronto, yet Hong Kong is mostly Chinese. However, houses are much cheaper in Toronto, which is what makes Toronto so attractive from an investment standpoint.
You gotta wonder how far all that whiz-bang western science woulda got calculating in Roman numerals, rather than positional notation, a.k.a. Arabic numerals.
For the most part, yes. I could support requiring people to pay a certain fraction of their wealth to a charity of their choice, but not entrench any kind of guaranteed social program into the law.
To be honest, I'm really starting to regret having started this thread. I put it up as proof of anti-white prejudice only for white supremacists to prove that anti-white prejudice pales in comparison to white prejudice against others.
Who wouldn't want to be the 'abuser' when the only other choice is to be the 'abused'?
Some of the greatest discoveries are made whilst looking for something else.
I'm well aware of white prejudice against others. But silly me, I actually expected our resident white supremacists to be able to actually tackle anti-white prejudice without demonstrating precisely what feeds that prejudice!
Prejudice feeds prejudice on all sides. Misandry feeds misogyny, misogyny feeds misandry, anti-white prejudice feeds white nationalism, and white nationalism feeds anti-white prejudice. They just feed off of one another.
If you say so, but early log cabins the settlers made are hardly an indication of the kinds of buildings they were raising back in Europe.
First, I've never even suggested anything remotely close to any of that shit. All I pointed out was that for a variety of reasons, North American natives were ignorant savages who hadn't managed to move their abilities forward in a thousand years. If that offends you, well, I couldn't really care less. I'm not going to compare your pathetic teepees with Notre Dame or the Cologne Cathedral, or the Hagia Sophia, because the idea is uproariously funny. The scientific and industrial advancement of Europe is a proven point of history.
You are a textbook snowflake, a brainless, drooling cretin whose eyes bulge with outrage at hearing anything which offends you. And EVERYTHING offends you. Go and cry, snowflake. Cry, cry! Someone pointed out the blindingly obvious! And it wasn't flattering to natives! Ahhhg! Boohhoooo!