Among many of the shallow conclusions in that article is notably the puerile thought at the end, concerning women having more rights or less rights.
This is typical thinking of an outsider, a person not aware of that society.
The real point is that women always had less rights in that culture whether under Saddam or under this new constitution. It is their culture that rules. Got it?
Statutes are almost meaningless when the culture of thinking is so dominant.
Such change is hollow when forced by statute.
Afghanistan is making a good try at it, but the women will know when and where to trust the change, or even if they are comfortable being more open and visible.
As far as all the other conclusions in that article, most are debateable and some simply unknowable.
This is typical thinking of an outsider, a person not aware of that society.
The real point is that women always had less rights in that culture whether under Saddam or under this new constitution. It is their culture that rules. Got it?
Statutes are almost meaningless when the culture of thinking is so dominant.
Such change is hollow when forced by statute.
Afghanistan is making a good try at it, but the women will know when and where to trust the change, or even if they are comfortable being more open and visible.
As far as all the other conclusions in that article, most are debateable and some simply unknowable.