Insulting others in a thread, in a childish way is the last resorts, when you have no argument left, maybe you should put real effort to understand what happened that day, instead of pasting links from website.
Fake CNN video on 9-11
- Thread starter Logic 7
- Start date
Insulting others in a thread, in a childish way is the last resorts, when you have no argument left, maybe you should put real effort to understand what happened that day, instead of pasting links from website.
I have never said if more people agree with something, it is right, show me where, can you?
Exactly this is exactly what i thought, just big words, withouth bringing support to your claim, this is why you agree with pangloss you know , you havent bring no photo, no video whatsover, to prove your point, either because you are too lazy, or you realize that the cnn video was completly fake, too bad for you i guess.
Actually, he does have a video, the original CNN video which says it is correct and your videos are fake.
You have videos which says they are correct and the CNN video is fake.
To "prove" something, you have to prove that your videos are not fakes and are correct. All you have shown is that IF your videos are correct AND they show what you claim they show THEN the CNN video is fake.
So, you must show, your videos ARE true AND they actually preclude another vantage point.
If we wanted to prove you wrong, we would have to prove your videos are fake and that they do not interfere with the angle of the CNN shot.
We aren't doing that, because we aren't interested in proving your videos wrong.
Likewise, you are not proving the CNN video wrong, because you are not yet proving that your videos and your interpretation of them are correct.
At this point all you have is "Agree to disagree", if you want to prove you are right.. you need to prove your videos and photos, not just show them and make a claim.
Does that make sense?
Logic: Why would I need to bring a video if my observation is that you are a lousy, dishonest debater?
Why would I want to start a thread? Your un-credible tactics are evidenced in this thread.
This isn't just about you - your entire camp writes and argues like you do.
That's all.
Pangloss
You are a real joke, keep posting like you do, you are showing how retarded you are, along with those who can't think by themselves,like i said before, i brought 3 different video-photo taken from 3 different source, when you have 1 and only from cnn, get a grip on your life, before it is too late.
This is how the thread went:
Title: Fake CNN video on 9-11
response:
How are your Alcan stocks doing these days Logic?
conspiracy nuts, witches, blah blah blah blah blah , logic is a bad man, logic is this, logic is there , logic is here, you know guys just get a life.
Last edited:
Hey,I haven't touched this thread in a while but today at work one of my buds,who I would have never thought wore tinfoil,said that people reported hearing explosions before the planes hit. Now,is this true or just another CT red herring?
Last edited:
Prove yourself right or shut up
You have three different videos, which could all be from one source, none of which have been proven credible.
So either put up or shut up, we are saying "prove these videos are correct" you have no response.
Quite frankly those videos are just people with too much time on their hands, probably altering the videos, looking for attention because they don't like being insignifigant in the grande scheme of things.
If you are trying to prove otherwise, then prove it. Right now you "Claim" the angles are wrong, but you haven't shown anything to PROVE they actually are.
So seriously, make some real proof besides posting the claims of some unverified sources or just agree to disagree, stop insulting people, and move on.
No. You are a dishonest debater. At least on this thread. As are your cohorts.
Pangloss
1) What proof is there that these are CNN videos?
2) How do you know the supposed missing building segment wasn't shot after 9-11? There are no leaves on the trees. There is nothing linking it to that date. Looks like late fall to me.
3) The burning flames look identical to me in all angles of videos.
4) What is your point? Are you contending that someone may have tampered with a video therefore the event didn't happen? Can you develop your argument a little so we know what it is you're trying to prove?
Thanks
For those of us who watched it live, on a whole bunch of different channels, we don't need your prepubescent stupidity, mixed in with totally erroneous claims of engineering expertise. It would be far simpler if you just shut up, because your constant blathering of utter stupidity is tiresome at best, and most certainly disrespectful.
Why don't you focus on the Air India thing, where it has actually been confirmed that a jet, suspected to have a bomb onboard, was allowed to leave Montreal because it would cost too much to keep it waiting for a couple more hours? At least there you could deal with facts, instead of invention.
Please,do not encourage these people to focus thier attention to another disaster. Somehow or other they will tie air india to george bush's third cousin's dog trainer which proves that Brian Mulrooney and Mila were covering it all up. Hmmm,Mila sounds like a pakistani name,doesn't it.