Dingwall got $418,000 package!

iamcanadian

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
730
0
16
www.expose-ontario.org
Non-elected government representatives should be very easy to fire without a big ado.

They are employees and nothing more. In fact given that most senior government employees get there from connections, nepotism and any number of ways that has nothng to do with their personal merit or ability, and that since any business they do is non-competitive and non-monetarily beneficial to the OWNER/Taxpayers, they should not be entittled to any severance pay WHATSOEVER.

If they don't like being fired by the People of Canada they can move to another country or get in to politics and change the government like every other citizen here is forced to do.
 

iamcanadian

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
730
0
16
www.expose-ontario.org
Regardless the Public is entittled to a public trial based on the conflicting evidence made public so far. The public is entittled to see ACCOUNTABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY managed in Government Business activities.

Some backroom deal involving a fix private arbitration is not acceptable to the taxpayers as a way of doing public business.

If this invovled a private company the SEC would be all over it with breach of trust throwing people in jail for 40 years like they did with Enron and Worldcom.

The public sector must not be above the law and MUST be put under the public microscope of public opinion.

When public business people get caught doing something wrong they should get 10 times the punishment that private sector gets. Since the taxpayers are forced to pay taxes and are helpless and without free will to direct public business or when they are forced to pay.
 

iamcanadian

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
730
0
16
www.expose-ontario.org
CAOs. Commissioners, Directors, you know the people that make all the decisions for our government through delivery of recommendations and reports that politicians rubber stamp.

They are not really business person's per say, they just like to think they are and avance the idea of running Government like a Business.

There is technically no such thing as Public Busines people, and that's why it so silly to hear people on this board talk about Dingwall as some executive that should get big bonus money for quiting his job as if he earned stock options or something.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
If you want to hate Dingwall, hate him for this.

Royal Canadian Mint faces salary probe: report

Updated Wed. Mar. 3 2004 11:36 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Questions are being raised about how the people who make Canada's money are spending it.

The Toronto Sun says a whistleblower has come forward to allege that top executives at the Royal Canadian Mint in Ottawa got hefty pay raises during a wave of staff layoffs.

The Auditor General's Department has now launched a probe into the money-losing Crown corporation.

The mint was more than $6 million in the red last year. But the president's pay jumped about 33 per cent, while the vice president's went up about 45 per cent, says the report. At the same time, 59 workers were laid off and others took early retirement.

Figures from the mint show that in 1999, the mint made a profit of $23.1 million. But by 2003, that had dropped to a loss of $6.6 million. During the same time, the president's salary rose to $240,900 from $181,700 and vice-presidents got a $63,000 boost to $201,000.

The whistleblower said he has been interviewed twice by the Auditor General's office and also handed over documents.

While a spokeswoman for the Auditor General's department would not confirm or deny the report, Prime Minister Paul Martin said Wednesday he had just been made aware of the allegations.

"And my understanding is that the AG will be looking at this, and that's the proper way to go," Martin told reporters in Peterborough, Ont.

He added that he found it heartening that employees at Crown corporations are feeling comfortable about coming forward with their allegations of wrongdoing.

"Quite clearly, I think that is exactly the kind of thing that the whistleblower legislation will permit," Martin said.

"I wouldn't be surprised if this was the beginning of a certain increase in whistleblowing," he added. "And that's as it should be."
 

iamcanadian

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
730
0
16
www.expose-ontario.org
I actually love this Dingwall thing.

It's things like this that will get people blowing whisstles on the rest of the scumbags those doing much worse than just taking excess pay and putting through extra expenses. The ones pocketing millions and taking turns pilfering our public corporations as if they own the place is what I am more concerned about. Places like the Regional Governments of Ontario where the Public Works and Business Services gangs are working over time filing their pockets with tens of millions as fast as they can before the network gets busted, to retire as multi-milionaires t golf paradise in Ireland or wherever as if they accomplished more with their lives that just keeping chairs warm as public servants.
 

Triple_R

Electoral Member
Jan 8, 2006
179
0
16
Re: RE: Dingwall got $418,000 package!

TenPenny said:
Triple_R said:
Clearly, one of two things occurred here...


Harper pushed for Dingwall's resignation because the poor excuse for a government employee was wasteful in his spending. If he was fired, that suggests that the Liberals agreed with Harper. If he resigned, that suggests that he doesn't deserve this severance package.

So any time we feel that one of Harper's appointees doesn't measure up to OUR idea of the spending guidelines, can we force them to resign? Despite what the rules are?

You can push for their resignation/firing, yes. That's democracy... many would say, that this is democracy at its best (i.e. holding political apointees accountable).
 

iamcanadian

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
730
0
16
www.expose-ontario.org
The man quit, then he gets no severance pay.

If the man was fired and gets severance pay, then he should be publicly fired with a trial to determine if it was wrongful or not, so all the dirt gets out.

This is scam on public accountability of a Civil Servant. The public should have the right to judge Civil Servants because they work for us The Public.

The Public is paying his severance and should no EXACTLY why its being paid.
 

zoofer

Council Member
Dec 31, 2005
1,274
2
38
City manager will pocket up to $800K in severance pay
Gurpreet Singh
Now Contributor

Surrey city manager Umendra Mital has resigned from his post following reports about differences with Mayor Dianne Watts.

Mital submitted his resignation to city council this week. He will leave the job on March 31.

A 12-year employee at city hall and close friend of former Surrey mayor Doug McCallum, Mital could earn as much as $800,000 in severance pay.

"Mr. Mital's departure is part of a mutual agreement with the Mayor (and) unanimously supported by Surrey Council," reads a Feb. 2 statement from the mayor's office.

However, Surrey Electors Team (SET) councillors have expressed frustration over the departure of Mital, who is credited by some for bringing large-scale development to Surrey.

Two SET councillors, Judy Higginbotham and Linda Hepner, said Thursday that Mital had to resign after he found it difficult to work with Watts. Hepner said Mital has been working in an environment where his abilities weren't being valued.

Higginbotham said SET did not want Mital to leave his post: "If we (SET) had continued with our previous administration, this would not be happening."

She said Mital opted to leave because Watts did not want him to continue his work.

Higginbotham said SET regretfully supported Mital's resignation only when the agreement he had with the city was honoured.

On Friday, Watts denied Mital's resignation was the outcome of her differences with him.

"There was no animosity between Mr. Mital and me. I have worked with him for many years," Watts told the Now.

Reacting to the allegations made by Hepner and Higginbotham about Mital being uncomfortable working under her, Watts said this question should be directed to Mital, who could not be reached for comment.

Watts would not reveal the severance amount paid to Mital, saying the information is confidential and shall be made public after the next city council meeting.

According to Higginbotham, Mital will be paid close to $700,000 in severance money as part of his agreement with the city. Hepner, however, said the figure is in the neighbourhood of $800,000. Both councillors said Mital was entitled to this money under the terms and conditions of his contract with the city.

Both SET councillors denied Mital's resignation had anything to do with the sexual harassment complaints that rocked city hall last year. A city employee lodged a complaint about sexual harassment against a manager but a settlement was reached with the complainant.

Ex-mayor McCallum ordered a lawyer who was hired to look into the allegations to confine his inquiry to a single instance, despite indications there could be other complaints involving the same manager. According to Local 402 of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, which filed a grievance last fall over the way the allegations were handled, several other women had come forward with accusations of their own.

Following the election of Watts, who defeated SET's McCallum in November's civic election to become Surrey's first female mayor, a consultant was hired to review the way the harassment case was handled. Last month, the city announced the matter had been resolved and that nine politicians and 1,500 employees would take mandatory training to recognize signs of sexual harassment and verbal intimidation.

Mital leaves a job that paid more than $250,000 a year in total remuneration. According to the city's 2003 statement of financial information, Mital topped a list of 153 city employees who made more than $75,000 annually.

Mital is recognized as a pro-business ally of McCallum. In January 2005, the pair jetted to China and India on a two-week, taxpayer-funded "friendship city" visit to Asian burgs in order to build economic and cultural ties.

-with files by Ted Colley

http://thenownewspaper.com/issues06/021206/news/021206nn1.html

He quit.
He gets $800,000?
Thank the Pope McCallum was not elected when he ran as a Liberal candidate.