Is not the 'War on Terror' just the 21st century version of the cold war?
The Soviet Union has been replaced by 'public enemy #1 - al-Qaeda.
The cry of al-Qaeda gives governments carte-blanche for their agenda and the public and mainstream media eat it all up.
The article clearly indicates terrorism is a friend of and supported by governments - basic political military strategy.
In the pursuit of oil in Africa...
Africa's Maghreb and Sahel regions recently exploded into world view with allegations that the Madrid bombers were tied to those areas' "al Qaeda" groups. And while United States concerns about terrorism in the region have been increasingly voiced, critics of the administration of President George W Bush say that the ongoing US pursuit of energy resources lies behind them. As early as the fall of 2002, Britain's Economist magazine charged that oil "is the only American interest in Africa".
Whereas in 2002 the continent offered apparently stable oil field conditions, that assessment was changed almost simultaneously with the level of domestic US pressures to acquire African oil; a substantive al-Qaeda threat materializing proportionate to the need for oil.
As a US Defense Department document this winter by Dr Jeffrey Record said: "The contemporary language on terrorism has become, as Conor Gearty puts it, 'the rhetorical servant of the established order'." It emphasized that almost nothing matters "a jot against the contemporary power of the terrorist label". ...
Exactly and very well said.
So putting this together, in the end will intelligence agencies 'orchestrate', 'aid and abet' a 'terror' attack on Canadian soil to get the public 'on-side' on the 'war on terror'?
In the dark world of intelligence and false flagging...
So much for being "best friends".