CBC will be downsizing.

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Might I suggest that anyone who expected the CBC to be apolitical was being perhaps a trifle naive?

Who payeth the piper calleth the tune.

CBC's mistake is that if they were interested in holding partisan views, they would have been wise to pander to the political party that was signing the cheques.

Suziki is a scientist and a environmentalist! What do you expect from the man?

His voice might not be yours, but if I would choose to listen to that voice I would want his and his platform.
Someone has to do it, and he does it well.

Suzuki is a lobbist interested in lining his own pockets.

He is everything that is wrong with the CBC... His voice represents a personal opinion, no different than you or I.... What is different is that Suzuki uses the taxpayers dollars to forward his personal agenda.

That is not what a public broadcaster is supposed to represent. I have no issues with Suzuki, or anyone else, publicizing their opinion of whatever it is that interests them; but not on my dime
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
From the Friends of the CBC



The full brunt of Stephen Harper’s hostility to our CBC is now in full view.

Today is a very bad day for those of us – and that includes the vast majority of Canadians -- who believe in and support public broadcasting.

Please stand with me now in support of public broadcasting and to hold Harper accountable for what he has done.

Earlier today, the CBC announced it faces a $130 million shortfall. This is largely the consequence of Harper’s punitive cuts to the CBC’s budget which as of April 1st are now fully phased in.

As a result, the creative energy of 657 CBC people who make programs will be lost to our national public broadcaster and the damage to every program CBC audiences see and hear will be obvious. Sadly, the layoffs will be concentrated among CBC’s younger, digitally savvy staff with less seniority.

Harper is attacking our CBC from the outside. But he also has an insidious strategy to undermine our national public broadcaster from within.

Seven years ago, Harper handed the reins to our most important cultural institution to someone with no senior level broadcasting or management experience whatsoever.

That lack of experience is now painfully clear to see as the CBC – knowing this day would come – has failed to prepare.

CBC’s President Hubert Lacroix owes his job to Harper and, as Harper’s man inside the CBC, appears to us to be doing the Prime Minister’s bidding.

Public broadcasting in Canada desperately needs your help right now.

Please help FRIENDS mount a major campaign to hold Harper accountable and to deter the next attack, which is looming on the horizon.

Harper's fingerprints can also been seen in a Senate Committee study of “challenges facing the CBC” that has turned into a campaign to strip all public funding from the CBC and give that money to the private broadcasters.

This is nothing less than a trial balloon straight from Harper that must be shot down immediately. We need your help now to expose this chicanery to public scrutiny.

Just days ago, Senator Leo Housakos, the Conservative Vice-Chair of the Senate Standing Committee on Transport and Communications – a man with close ties to Prime Minister Harper – placed this agenda firmly on the Committee’s plate.


Here is the question Housakos asked at the Committee’s hearing on last Tuesday:

“Is there a way to take the money we spend right now on a broadcaster (the CBC) and re-route that money to give that $1 billion-plus dollars to filmmakers and producers of Canadian content so they can make quality content and films? Once they make that quality Canadian content, wouldn’t there be an easier appeal made to the private broadcasters to start running it more.”

Click here to read the full preamble to the above question.

Although the Senator posed this question on the morning of April 1st, this was clearly no April Fool.

So here, in a nutshell, are the ideas of a close confidant of the Prime Minister:

• Kill CBC Radio and Television
• Give the money to private producers
• Hand over the programs to private broadcasters

Two months ago I appeared before the Committee on your behalf. I was invited as a witness on February 4th at the outset of the Committee’s study.

Thinking back to my own encounter with the Conservative Senators that day, I can now see where they are going.

After my presentation, Conservative Senator Don Plett asked me “I believe you have posted a petition asking the government to increase funding” for the CBC. “How much funding should the government give the CBC?” Then, leaning forward in his chair, Plett added, “I am not sure that I support giving them funding”.

So, at the very beginning of an eighteen month study, Senator Plett – a former President of the Canadian Alliance Party and the founding President of the Conservative Party of Canada, rewarded in 2009 by Stephen Harper with a Senate appointment – had apparently already made up his mind that CBC should get no funds!

I left that meeting wondering if the dice were not loaded against public broadcasting on a Committee made up of eight Conservative and three Liberal senators.

We need your help to keep a very close eye on these folks, to expose their hostility to public broadcasting, and to connect the dots to Stephen Harper.

Make no mistake: this is Harper’s latest attack on our national public broadcaster. Please help us fund this campaign today.
This is the strongest attack on public broadcasting in Parliament since its creation under Prime Minister R. B. Bennett in the depths of the Great Depression!

Best regards!

Ian Morrison
Spokesperson
FRIENDS of Canadian Broadcasting
PS: Here is a chart which shows the purchasing power in current 2014 dollars of the federal government’s annual grant to the CBC since 1990. It speaks for itself!

Reader Tips - Small Dead Animals

* a tear

 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Appears ol' cretin didn't do the cbc any favours either. Were there tears then?
 

Count_Lothian

Time Out
Apr 6, 2014
793
0
16
Appears ol' cretin didn't do the cbc any favours either. Were there tears then?

Same as now. People go along with their Logo of choice when it comes to downsizing the CBC.

It's sad because CBC actually is a Canadian Content (pun intended ) entity.
It showcases programming that is aimed directly at our culture.
Some bad ,some great.

This whole brew hahaha over it's news team being Liberal is absurd. I think they are more bent towards the NDP crowd as of late. LOL!

What I love from the news team is an honest straight forward foreign news team.
If you watch CTV or CNN you come away with pretty much the same journalistic viewpoint of a foreign piece .

Then you watch the CBC and there is generally another angle to the telling of the event.

I've seen this for years, and being a news junkie ,am always proud when the CBC cuts to the juggler and omits the propaganda.
Propaganda one usually sees on USA television.

I loathe the spin produced in television journalism.
I wonder if the lack of spin is what causes some CBC haters to label them with a Liberal bent?
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
The Museum of Broadcast Communications in Chicago notes that two-thirds of the countries in Europe and half of the countries in Asia and Africa use television licences to fund public television. TV licensing is rare in the Americas, largely being confined to French overseas departments and British Overseas Territories.


In some countries, radio channels and broadcasters' web sites are also funded by a radio receiver licence, giving access to radio and web services free of commercial advertising.


The actual cost and implementation of the television licence varies greatly from country to country. The rest of this section looks at the licence fee in a number of countries around the world.




more




Television licence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia