The Fraser Institute has released a controversial study entitled "Canadian First Nations - Hoax or Fraud" which claims that no aboriginals existed in the Americas at the time of the European arrival.
The study, authored by Dr. Marvin Nerdofcorse, PHD, advances the theory that Canadian First Nations originated as part of an elaborate fraud perpetrated by early colonists to fraudulently obtain funds from their European rulers.
In a recent interview, Dr. Nerdofcorse, a protege of University of Calgary professor Tom Flanagan, acknowledged that the study 'may be controversial' conceding that 'the verified facts will not be accepted by the "Canadian First Nations" and other interests that have received benefits from this fraud for many years.'
Dr Nerdofcorse indicated 'I'm content to let the facts of the study speak for themselves'.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse is confident that his study provides incontrovertible evidence that the original 'Indians' described by early colonists were in fact mid-European Gypsies brought to the Americas to play the role of "adversaries".
The study states 'When European explorers and colonists arrived in the Americas, they found an idyllic setting totally untouched by man and free of threat. It was immediately apparent that the Americas offered untold resources which could be developed with little effort and minimal cost.
However, unscrupulous members amongst the early European arrivals quickly realized that substantial funds could be acquired from their European masters for the purposes of "defending" against an existing "threat", if in fact such a "threat" could be proven to exist.
To create a credible adversary, swarthy European Gypsies were secretly imported to the Americas and presented as an aboriginal "threat" to colonization attempts.
Due to their nomadic lifestyle, the sudden disappearance of the Gypsies went unremarked in Europe.
The funds made available by the colonist's aristocratic masters to "defend" against the identified aboriginal "threat" were pocketed by the colonial scam artists.
Gypsies being Gypsies, they eventually made their way to all parts of the Americas. These new 'aboriginals' quickly caught onto the fact that more money could be made through carrying on the pretence of 'offended' aboriginals with 'land claims' and 'rights' than had been possible through their traditional practices of reading tea leaves and crystal balls.
The fraud has been perpetuated by successive liberal governments in Canada and the U.S. as a means of secretly diverting taxpayer funds, purportedly directed to aboriginals, to various socialist programs, such as "health care" that taxpayers are led to believe cost far less than is in fact the case.
The study concludes that the "First Nation" citizens inhabiting today's Canadian reserves are in fact government subsidized descendants of European Gypsy riff-raff, rather than representatives of any true aboriginal race.'
Based on this conclusion, Dr. Nerdofcorse indicates that as no 'Indians' ever in fact existed, so-called Indian "land claims" and "rights" are completely spurious.
Dr. Nerdofcorse attributes his interest in the origins of Canadian First Nations to 'an inquisitive mind' and an off-hand 'who the hell do those people think they are' comment made by his mentor Professor Flanagan in respect of a First Nation land claim.
'Most people just go through life accepting what they're told without ever questioning' Dr. Nerdofcorse told us.
'I never did. My life has been an ongoing quest for answers to questions such as 'why is the sky blue'; 'why do we call eggs "eggs"; 'why do you always get a big zit on the end of your nose the night of the school dance?
I've found that once you start asking questions many of the "facts" we're taught just don't make sense. So after overhearing Tom's comment, I found myself wondering just who those people really were.
When I started thinking about it, I realized that a lot of what "history" tells us about Canadian First Nations just doesn't make sense.
Let's take this whole "neolithic people crossing a land bridge thing." Does it seem reasonable that people with a perfectly good land to live in would just pack up one day and set off across an arctic waste to God knows where in a journey that could see them falling off the end of the earth?
It doesn't make sense to me, and I daresay it wouldn't make sense to most. I mean, unlike Europeans, it wasn't like they had any sort of sensible reason for going anywhere, like looking for China or something. They were already there.
Ask yourself, if there were aboriginals living in the Americas before the arrival of Europeans, why didn't they leave any books for us to read? Obviously there are no books, so there were no aboriginals.
Sure, some historians claim North American Indians had no written language but, think about it. We have a written language, so why wouldn't they? This "lack of a written language" excuse seems pretty convenient to me.
Dr. Nerdofcorse laughs off the belief that a number of Central and South American "Indians" created highly sophisticated civilizations.
'Let's think about it' Dr. Nerdofcorse said 'you have a couple of attached continents where on one hand you have a group of aboriginals that historians claim couldn't read or write if their lives depended on it and on the other you have a different group that builds pyramids, creates calendars, etc.
Does that make sense to you? I mean, you can't have it both ways.'
To illustrate his point, Dr. Nerdofcorse directed us a web site called "Aboes or Atlanteans?".
'This site presents what is to me clear evidence that structures and objects attributed to "Aztecs", "Mayas" and the like were in fact created by survivors of the Atlantean cataclysm who later developed interplanetary travel and migrated to an unknown star system.
The structures and objects left by the Atlanteans were used as convenient props to support the fraudulent 'aboriginal' scheme concocted by later European arrivals.'
'History' Dr. Nerdofcorse indicated 'tells us that Europeans "conquered" the aboriginal tribes that originally occupied the Americas.
However, my exhaustive research of sources such as the movie "Last of the Mohicans", starring the wonderful actor Daniel Day Lewis and awesome Madeleine Stowe, proves this could not have been the case.
The movie documents a series of massacres in which British regular troops consistently come out on the bad end at the hands of aboriginal warriors. After viewing the movie several times, it became apparent to me that the evidence just doesn't support the ability of European troops to "conquer" aboriginal warriors.
The evidence clearly supports the fact that an aboriginal could only be killed by other aboriginals or the occasional white man raised by aboriginals. So, obviously a conquest could never have taken place. But then, how could there have been a conquest when there was no one here to conquer?
Dr. Nerdofcorse is confident the facts he presents leave no room for argument.
'My study is the result of some two weeks of exhaustive research, both on and off-line. When viewed as a whole, I believe the facts I've assembled are beyond dispute.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse shrugs off questions concerning the validity of his academic credentials.
Some critics have asserted that his earning over a three month period the BA, MA and PHD credentials that most students take years to acquire brings his academic credibility, and the motives of his mentor Professor Flanagan in aiding him to do so, into question.
'I think most people are aware I suffer from agoraphobia and haven't left the house since I was eight. Many people might view this an impediment however, to me it's been a positive. My isolation from society enabled me to develop my thought processes within an environment that is completely untainted by reality.
My meeting Professor Flanagan came about as a result of a paper I sent to him for comment titled "Canada - Ripe for the Picking". The paper impressed Professor Flanagan and he contacted me suggesting I pursue post-secondary credentials because, as he put it, Canadian academia was in desparate need of my 'out of the box' mode of thought.
Not being in a position to become involved in "keggers" and other social aspects of post-secondary education, I was able to, with Tom's help, complete my studies in a bit less time then most.
The Fraser Institute doesn't question my credentials. What more is there to say?'
Professor Flanagan indicated 'It's great to have an example of solid, independent third-party research that supports certain views that I and my puppet, I mean friend, Stephen share and have in the past been castigated for expressing. This study by Dr. Nerdofcorse is another support for the Canada that I, I mean, the Conservative party, is dedicated to create.
When asked to comment on the study, eminent Canadian historian Professor Paul Notpaidenuf told us 'Marvin is the type of guy who could prove Venusians populated the Earth based on researched he's performed from the back of a Count Chocula box.
What bugs me is that his entire theory is nonsense however, no one will ever read it to find out. All most people will see is a headline in their local rag screaming 'Indians All Fake' and that will be enough for them.
What can I say? I spend seven years researching a study that proves Canada could disentangle itself from the web of corporate globalism and create a decent society and the best I can do is page 7 of the Canadian NDP Progressive Horticulturist Monthly.
Marvin claims the First Nations are composed of European Gypsies and gets front page headlines in every mainstream Canadian newspaper. Kind of makes you wonder.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse is currently researching the genealogy of Stephen Harper, leader of the Conservative Party.
'It's really quite fascinating.' Dr. Nerdofcorse told us.
'Mr. Harper is in fact a direct descendant of both the French Merovingian line and the English Plantagenet line. Based on these facts, he clearly has the most legitimate claim to the Canadian throne.'
When we pointed out to Dr. Nerdofcorse that Canada, while maintaining ties to the British Crown, has an elected government rather than 'throne', his response was 'well, you'll have to speak to Tom about that'.
The study, authored by Dr. Marvin Nerdofcorse, PHD, advances the theory that Canadian First Nations originated as part of an elaborate fraud perpetrated by early colonists to fraudulently obtain funds from their European rulers.
In a recent interview, Dr. Nerdofcorse, a protege of University of Calgary professor Tom Flanagan, acknowledged that the study 'may be controversial' conceding that 'the verified facts will not be accepted by the "Canadian First Nations" and other interests that have received benefits from this fraud for many years.'
Dr Nerdofcorse indicated 'I'm content to let the facts of the study speak for themselves'.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse is confident that his study provides incontrovertible evidence that the original 'Indians' described by early colonists were in fact mid-European Gypsies brought to the Americas to play the role of "adversaries".
The study states 'When European explorers and colonists arrived in the Americas, they found an idyllic setting totally untouched by man and free of threat. It was immediately apparent that the Americas offered untold resources which could be developed with little effort and minimal cost.
However, unscrupulous members amongst the early European arrivals quickly realized that substantial funds could be acquired from their European masters for the purposes of "defending" against an existing "threat", if in fact such a "threat" could be proven to exist.
To create a credible adversary, swarthy European Gypsies were secretly imported to the Americas and presented as an aboriginal "threat" to colonization attempts.
Due to their nomadic lifestyle, the sudden disappearance of the Gypsies went unremarked in Europe.
The funds made available by the colonist's aristocratic masters to "defend" against the identified aboriginal "threat" were pocketed by the colonial scam artists.
Gypsies being Gypsies, they eventually made their way to all parts of the Americas. These new 'aboriginals' quickly caught onto the fact that more money could be made through carrying on the pretence of 'offended' aboriginals with 'land claims' and 'rights' than had been possible through their traditional practices of reading tea leaves and crystal balls.
The fraud has been perpetuated by successive liberal governments in Canada and the U.S. as a means of secretly diverting taxpayer funds, purportedly directed to aboriginals, to various socialist programs, such as "health care" that taxpayers are led to believe cost far less than is in fact the case.
The study concludes that the "First Nation" citizens inhabiting today's Canadian reserves are in fact government subsidized descendants of European Gypsy riff-raff, rather than representatives of any true aboriginal race.'
Based on this conclusion, Dr. Nerdofcorse indicates that as no 'Indians' ever in fact existed, so-called Indian "land claims" and "rights" are completely spurious.
Dr. Nerdofcorse attributes his interest in the origins of Canadian First Nations to 'an inquisitive mind' and an off-hand 'who the hell do those people think they are' comment made by his mentor Professor Flanagan in respect of a First Nation land claim.
'Most people just go through life accepting what they're told without ever questioning' Dr. Nerdofcorse told us.
'I never did. My life has been an ongoing quest for answers to questions such as 'why is the sky blue'; 'why do we call eggs "eggs"; 'why do you always get a big zit on the end of your nose the night of the school dance?
I've found that once you start asking questions many of the "facts" we're taught just don't make sense. So after overhearing Tom's comment, I found myself wondering just who those people really were.
When I started thinking about it, I realized that a lot of what "history" tells us about Canadian First Nations just doesn't make sense.
Let's take this whole "neolithic people crossing a land bridge thing." Does it seem reasonable that people with a perfectly good land to live in would just pack up one day and set off across an arctic waste to God knows where in a journey that could see them falling off the end of the earth?
It doesn't make sense to me, and I daresay it wouldn't make sense to most. I mean, unlike Europeans, it wasn't like they had any sort of sensible reason for going anywhere, like looking for China or something. They were already there.
Ask yourself, if there were aboriginals living in the Americas before the arrival of Europeans, why didn't they leave any books for us to read? Obviously there are no books, so there were no aboriginals.
Sure, some historians claim North American Indians had no written language but, think about it. We have a written language, so why wouldn't they? This "lack of a written language" excuse seems pretty convenient to me.
Dr. Nerdofcorse laughs off the belief that a number of Central and South American "Indians" created highly sophisticated civilizations.
'Let's think about it' Dr. Nerdofcorse said 'you have a couple of attached continents where on one hand you have a group of aboriginals that historians claim couldn't read or write if their lives depended on it and on the other you have a different group that builds pyramids, creates calendars, etc.
Does that make sense to you? I mean, you can't have it both ways.'
To illustrate his point, Dr. Nerdofcorse directed us a web site called "Aboes or Atlanteans?".
'This site presents what is to me clear evidence that structures and objects attributed to "Aztecs", "Mayas" and the like were in fact created by survivors of the Atlantean cataclysm who later developed interplanetary travel and migrated to an unknown star system.
The structures and objects left by the Atlanteans were used as convenient props to support the fraudulent 'aboriginal' scheme concocted by later European arrivals.'
'History' Dr. Nerdofcorse indicated 'tells us that Europeans "conquered" the aboriginal tribes that originally occupied the Americas.
However, my exhaustive research of sources such as the movie "Last of the Mohicans", starring the wonderful actor Daniel Day Lewis and awesome Madeleine Stowe, proves this could not have been the case.
The movie documents a series of massacres in which British regular troops consistently come out on the bad end at the hands of aboriginal warriors. After viewing the movie several times, it became apparent to me that the evidence just doesn't support the ability of European troops to "conquer" aboriginal warriors.
The evidence clearly supports the fact that an aboriginal could only be killed by other aboriginals or the occasional white man raised by aboriginals. So, obviously a conquest could never have taken place. But then, how could there have been a conquest when there was no one here to conquer?
Dr. Nerdofcorse is confident the facts he presents leave no room for argument.
'My study is the result of some two weeks of exhaustive research, both on and off-line. When viewed as a whole, I believe the facts I've assembled are beyond dispute.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse shrugs off questions concerning the validity of his academic credentials.
Some critics have asserted that his earning over a three month period the BA, MA and PHD credentials that most students take years to acquire brings his academic credibility, and the motives of his mentor Professor Flanagan in aiding him to do so, into question.
'I think most people are aware I suffer from agoraphobia and haven't left the house since I was eight. Many people might view this an impediment however, to me it's been a positive. My isolation from society enabled me to develop my thought processes within an environment that is completely untainted by reality.
My meeting Professor Flanagan came about as a result of a paper I sent to him for comment titled "Canada - Ripe for the Picking". The paper impressed Professor Flanagan and he contacted me suggesting I pursue post-secondary credentials because, as he put it, Canadian academia was in desparate need of my 'out of the box' mode of thought.
Not being in a position to become involved in "keggers" and other social aspects of post-secondary education, I was able to, with Tom's help, complete my studies in a bit less time then most.
The Fraser Institute doesn't question my credentials. What more is there to say?'
Professor Flanagan indicated 'It's great to have an example of solid, independent third-party research that supports certain views that I and my puppet, I mean friend, Stephen share and have in the past been castigated for expressing. This study by Dr. Nerdofcorse is another support for the Canada that I, I mean, the Conservative party, is dedicated to create.
When asked to comment on the study, eminent Canadian historian Professor Paul Notpaidenuf told us 'Marvin is the type of guy who could prove Venusians populated the Earth based on researched he's performed from the back of a Count Chocula box.
What bugs me is that his entire theory is nonsense however, no one will ever read it to find out. All most people will see is a headline in their local rag screaming 'Indians All Fake' and that will be enough for them.
What can I say? I spend seven years researching a study that proves Canada could disentangle itself from the web of corporate globalism and create a decent society and the best I can do is page 7 of the Canadian NDP Progressive Horticulturist Monthly.
Marvin claims the First Nations are composed of European Gypsies and gets front page headlines in every mainstream Canadian newspaper. Kind of makes you wonder.'
Dr. Nerdofcorse is currently researching the genealogy of Stephen Harper, leader of the Conservative Party.
'It's really quite fascinating.' Dr. Nerdofcorse told us.
'Mr. Harper is in fact a direct descendant of both the French Merovingian line and the English Plantagenet line. Based on these facts, he clearly has the most legitimate claim to the Canadian throne.'
When we pointed out to Dr. Nerdofcorse that Canada, while maintaining ties to the British Crown, has an elected government rather than 'throne', his response was 'well, you'll have to speak to Tom about that'.
