BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples

A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

Based on chemical analysis of WTC structural steel residue, a Brigham Young University physics professor has identified the material as Thermate. Thermate is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur cases the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue.



Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns, as evident in the photo below.

Dr. Jones is a co-founder of Scholars for 911 Truth.

Dr. Jones in earlier work pointed to thermate as the likely explosive that brought down the WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 skyscrapers. But only recently was physical material analysed in the lab and the presense of thermate announced. The samples were provided Dr. Jones team from redundant sourses.

Both BYU and Prof. Jones have been offered additional grants if he would "change the direction" of his research. In addition, there have been threats made by an individual who "is taking action" to stop Steven Jones' research, specifically his experiment with thermites (aluminothermics), on the grounds his work may be helpful to "terrorists". Jones notes that much more detailed information on both thermite and thermate is readily available on the internet.
Click to expand...



That finally explain why wtc 1,2 and 7 collapse, an inside job period.
 
I think not

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
“Professor Jones’s department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones.”
Click to expand...

http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724
 
A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
“Professor Jones’s department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones.”
Click to expand...

http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724
Click to expand...


Do not support, doesnt mean, he isnt right, but thankx for this info though, we will see what happen next.
 
dekhqonbacha

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
I think not said:
“Professor Jones’s department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones.”
Click to expand...

http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724
Click to expand...

That's what I also found. That his work was not supported.
 
A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samp

dekhqonbacha said:
aeon
you are lucky for now. I did research for at least 2 hours, but deleted it. You must be blessed. I cut it instead of copiing.

Next time, you will find out about it.
Click to expand...


Lucky for what?
 
A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samp

dekhqonbacha said:
aeon
you are lucky for now. I did research for at least 2 hours, but deleted it. You must be blessed. I cut it instead of copiing.

Next time, you will find out about it.
Click to expand...



There is a function called ""Undo"", when you work on a software like for exemple explorer, you delete something, you can bback by doing an ""undo"" and everything is back to normal.
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
aeon said:
Well if he has something that discredit this claim, i would be very happy to read it.
Click to expand...

That's simple not believable. It's perfectly clear from your many posts on this subject that you decided a long time ago this was an inside conspiracy, you're just looking for confirming evidence and ignoring or denying discomfirming evidence. It's a common fallacy called, fairly obviously, confirmation bias http://www.skepdic.com/confirmbias.html ; very few of your posts on 9/11 don't display it.
 
A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Dexter Sinister said:
aeon said:
Well if he has something that discredit this claim, i would be very happy to read it.
Click to expand...

That's simple not believable. It's perfectly clear from your many posts on this subject that you decided a long time ago this was an inside conspiracy, you're just looking for confirming evidence and ignoring or denying discomfirming evidence. It's a common fallacy called, fairly obviously, confirmation bias http://www.skepdic.com/confirmbias.html ; very few of your posts on 9/11 don't display it.
Click to expand...



Guys, read this carefully......



THIS THREAD IS ABOUT A BYU PHYSIC PROF WHO FOUND THEMATE IN WTC SAMPLES, NOT MYSELF.
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
aeon said:
Guys, read this carefully......

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT A BYU PHYSIC PROF WHO FOUND THEMATE IN WTC SAMPLES, NOT MYSELF.
Click to expand...

Yes I know, my reading comprehension is excellent, and shouting doesn't help your credibility. If you'd done even a cursory search on his name and thermate, as I did after I saw your first post here, you'd have found many references sharply critical of his conclusions. Or maybe you did and just didn't bother mentioning them. He did not find thermate as such, he found chemical traces consistent with the presence of thermate, and a whole lot of other things, notably plastics and diesel oil. He's another one who decided a long time ago that 9/11 was an inside job. He suffers from the same confirmation bias you do.
 
A

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Dexter Sinister said:
aeon said:
Guys, read this carefully......

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT A BYU PHYSIC PROF WHO FOUND THEMATE IN WTC SAMPLES, NOT MYSELF.
Click to expand...

Yes I know, my reading comprehension is excellent, and shouting doesn't help your credibility. If you'd done even a cursory search on his name and thermate, as I did after I saw your first post here, you'd have found many references sharply critical of his conclusions. Or maybe you did and just didn't bother mentioning them. He did not find thermate as such, he found chemical traces consistent with the presence of thermate, and a whole lot of other things, notably plastics and diesel oil. He's another one who decided a long time ago that 9/11 was an inside job. He suffers from the same confirmation bias you do.
Click to expand...


Post what you found, or shut up, it is not us who decide 9-11 was an ijnside job, it is the us governement who constantly distorting facts, covering up the event, sorry to tell you this, those who still believe the officials story these days, needs serious psychological help, and it is urgent.
 
missile

missile

House Member
Dec 1, 2004
4,846
17
38
Saint John N.B.
Dex is right again. This nutjob is looking for evidence that supports only his distorted views and isn't interested in any truth. I suggest he is of Arabic origins,too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom