http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article1219021.ece
Well there you have it, depending on what you believe of what you read.
Bush WANTS to invade all the oil-rich Islamic nations, he is not, as he says, "using war as the LAST option". No, it is his first choice.
When we see what invading Iraq has become, and multiply it by 10fold, we see what will happen if the USA forces get into IRAN . Quagmire times 10.
All nations must speak up against any such idea as invading Iran on the basis of fighting terrorism. he has allreeady done more damage than 9-11 did, by far, and all it got the USA is MORE anger towards them, meaning MORE terrorists with anger and motive.
There are other ways to react to terrorism. We must also consider that the actual damage to America was small, despite the dramatic events of 9-11 they were not that bad.
Like the Toronto 17, and now the London Shampoo Bomb makers, there wasn't even an actual threat, just plans, and look at how we over-react!! Its obvious to me that someone wants these events to appear much more dangerous than they are - leaders used to try to CALM the public with messages of "we will endure", but Peter Mackay comes out trying to SCARE us. The threat to you or I being hurt by a terrorist, even if all these plans did come to be, is miniscule.
Ignore global warming, but getting all excited about a few tall buildings being blow up doesn't make sense, something is afoot that they are not being straight with us about. I have a theory.... that you must know by now.
Karlin
A former intelligence officer, also quoted, says: "We told Israel,'Look, if you guys have to go, we're behind you all the way. But we think it should be sooner rather than later. The longer you wait, the less time we have to evaluate and plan for Iran before Bush gets out of office'."
Well there you have it, depending on what you believe of what you read.
Bush WANTS to invade all the oil-rich Islamic nations, he is not, as he says, "using war as the LAST option". No, it is his first choice.
When we see what invading Iraq has become, and multiply it by 10fold, we see what will happen if the USA forces get into IRAN . Quagmire times 10.
All nations must speak up against any such idea as invading Iran on the basis of fighting terrorism. he has allreeady done more damage than 9-11 did, by far, and all it got the USA is MORE anger towards them, meaning MORE terrorists with anger and motive.
There are other ways to react to terrorism. We must also consider that the actual damage to America was small, despite the dramatic events of 9-11 they were not that bad.
Like the Toronto 17, and now the London Shampoo Bomb makers, there wasn't even an actual threat, just plans, and look at how we over-react!! Its obvious to me that someone wants these events to appear much more dangerous than they are - leaders used to try to CALM the public with messages of "we will endure", but Peter Mackay comes out trying to SCARE us. The threat to you or I being hurt by a terrorist, even if all these plans did come to be, is miniscule.
Ignore global warming, but getting all excited about a few tall buildings being blow up doesn't make sense, something is afoot that they are not being straight with us about. I have a theory.... that you must know by now.
Karlin