Bush sees setbacks in Iraq, weighs more US troops

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
By Caren Bohan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iraqi insurgents have thwarted U.S. efforts to establish security, President George W. Bush said on Wednesday, and he pledged that any boost in American troops would be tied to a specific mission to curb violence.

Bush, who is rethinking his war strategy, spoke of setbacks this year but predicted victory and insisted the United States would neither abandon Iraq nor be driven from the region.

"They can't run us out of the Middle East," he said at a news conference. "They can't intimidate America."

Bush said provocative attacks such as the February bombing of a holy Shi'ite shrine were part of a strategy by insurgents to foment sectarian strife.

"And over the course of the year they had success," Bush said. "Their success hurt our efforts to help the Iraqis rebuild their country. They set back reconciliation and kept Iraq's unity government and our coalition from establishing security and stability throughout the country."

Bush plans to roll out a fresh plan for Iraq in January. He said one option under review was a short-term increase in U.S. troop levels there. He also endorsed a longer-term increase in the overall size of the U.S. military, a change previously resisted by his administration.

Some White House officials are said to be pushing for a "surge" of tens of thousands of troops in Iraq to try to calm violence to give the Iraqi government time to work on political reconciliation and allow the Iraqi army to get up to speed.

But some in the military are skeptical that more U.S. troops in Iraq are the answer.

Gen. John Abizaid, the U.S. military commander of forces in the Middle East who will retire early next year, said last month that "troop levels need to stay where they are," rejecting calls for increases or withdrawals

Bush said he would only support a troop increase if the there was a "specific mission that can be accomplished."

In a Washington Post interview on Tuesday, Bush had said of Iraq, "We're not winning, we're not losing."

That was a reversal from his insistence in the weeks before November's U.S. congressional elections that the United States was "absolutely" winning in Iraq.

Asked to explain his apparent change of heart, Bush said his comment "reflected the fact that we're not succeeding nearly as fast as I wanted, when I said it at the time, and that the conditions are tough in Iraq, particularly in Baghdad."

He conceded Americans were troubled by "unspeakable" violence in Iraq but said he believed the public supported his view that an immediate U.S. pullout was not the right course.

Bush has faced increased pressure to revamp his policy since last month's elections in which his Republican Party lost control of the U.S. Congress in elections last month, largely because of public discontent over the war. A new CNN poll shows most Americans are still hoping for a dramatic shift.

Almost three-quarters in the survey, taken December 15-17, said they wanted a "complete overhaul" or "major changes" to the strategy. Twenty-four percent said they would be satisfied with minor adjustments or no changes.

Bush's critics say his rhetoric, including his rejection of a timetable for a troop withdrawal, shows he is not heeding the electorate's message.

Incoming U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi faulted Bush for not signaling that he is contemplating "the changes needed to reverse the disastrous situation in Iraq."

But the California Democrat welcomed Bush's decision to back a permanent increase in the size of the military, and pointed out that many Democrats had pushed the idea.

There are about 507,000 active duty U.S. Army soldiers and 180,000 Marines. Every additional 10,000 U.S. troops would cost about $1.2 billion a year in salaries and training, not including equipment, said Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman.

(Additional reporting by Tabassum Zakaria)

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited
 

normbc9

Electoral Member
Nov 23, 2006
483
14
18
California
Just because Dubya is President doesn't make him a genius in War Therory. If more are sent, more will return in coffins on the weekly mortuary flight. His rose colored glasses are too tinted and his optic receptors aren't working well either. Maybe that is why the thinking process is so stunted.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Opposition to Bush's War At All Time High

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/14180


Opposition to Iraq War Hits 67% in U.S.

December 22, 2006

(ARGM) - The number of Americans who reject the coalition effort is now the highest since the conflict began, according to a poll by Opinion Research Corporation released by CNN. 67 per cent of respondents oppose the United States war in Iraq, up six points since early November.
The coalition effort against Saddam Hussein’s regime was launched in March 2003. At least 2,958 American soldiers have died during the military operation, and more than 22,400 troops have been wounded in action.
In December 2005, Iraqi voters renewed their National Assembly. In May, Shiite United Iraqi Alliance member Nouri al-Maliki officially took over as prime minister.
On Dec. 6, the Iraq Study Group—a bipartisan panel of experts—presented its findings on how to deal with the situation in Iraq. The ten members called for a quicker process to train Iraqi forces, engaging with Iran and Syria in a dialogue aimed at stabilizing Iraq, and pulling back U.S. combat troops by early 2008. 54 per cent of respondents believe all soldiers should be withdrawn from Iraq either immediately or in the next 12 months.
On Dec. 20, U.S. president George W. Bush commented on the results of recent polls on the Iraq war, saying, "It’s been a tough period for the American people. They want to see success. And our objective is to put a plan in place that achieves that success. I’m often asked about public opinion. Of course, I want public opinion to support the efforts. I understand that. I also understand the consequences of failure. And, therefore, I’m going to work with the Iraqis and our military and politicians from both political parties to achieve success."
Polling Data
Do you favour or oppose the U.S. war in Iraq?


Dec. 17
Nov. 5
Oct. 15
Favour
31%
33%
34%
Oppose
67%
61%
64%
Unsure
2%
6%
2%
Here are four different plans the U.S. could follow in dealing with the war in Iraq. Which one do you prefer?


Dec. 17
Jun. 11
Withdraw all troops from Iraq immediately
21%
18%
Withdraw all troops in 12 months’ time
33%
29%
Withdraw troops, but take as many years to do this as are needed to turn control over to the Iraqis
32%
42%
Send more troops to Iraq
11%
6%
No opinion
3%
5%
Source: Opinion Research Corporation / CNN
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,019 American adults, conducted from Dec. 15 to Dec. 17, 2006. Margin of error is 3 per cent.





Bush's treasonous war of imperialistic terrorism has now gotten a higher opposition rating than did the Vietnam war. It took a while but at long last the American public has awakened to Bush's stupidity and treason. Not that any of this was ever a secret - just that it took a long while for Yanks to see the truth that had been expounded by patriotic peace makers such as those in the links I provided previously.