Bush again questions on WMDs
- Thread starter Jersay
- Start date
I think not said:
That's wonderfull ITN but you'd elect the exact same problems before his lying body was cold, unless you change the system that allowed the lunatic into power in the first place you're just window dressing, typical corporate packageing.
Re: RE: Bush again questions on WMDs
Not to mention the fact that they have yet to establish a democracy in the United States. Something they will resist as patriots to the end.
cortezzz said:
Not to mention the fact that they have yet to establish a democracy in the United States. Something they will resist as patriots to the end.
Re: RE: Bush again questions on WMDs
Why do you continue to sanitize war crimes and conquest and murder as simply an example of American benevolence, as long as America stays in Iraq they will have no chance of independance or peace. The interest is under the sand not the people.
jimmoyer said:
Why do you continue to sanitize war crimes and conquest and murder as simply an example of American benevolence, as long as America stays in Iraq they will have no chance of independance or peace. The interest is under the sand not the people.
Bush, in terms of Weapons of Mass Destruction
:arrow: Weapons of Mass Destruction
In terms of weapons of mass destruction, I think it should be clear, at this point, that whether or not His Excellency the Honourable George Bush, President of the United States of America had intended, the citizens of America were misinformed; I would think it to be somewhat conclusive, by now, that weapons of mass destruction were not present (at least in any of the forms contended by the United States) in the Republic of Iraq.
However, in my opinion, it remains unclear as to whether or not the President had been aware of the extreme possibility of the errors in his announcements to the American people. Nonetheless, I would hope that the President would have thought it appropriate to address the nation and retract any incorrect information, once he had been made aware of any such errors — however, transparency has not been a highlight of this current Bush Administration.
:arrow: Democracy in Iraq
I have a sincere hope that Iraq can be made into a democratic nation; however, I have doubts that this can be achieved at this time. I have asserted in the past, and would do so again today, that a true democracy, one which is to stand without the "parenting" of another nation, must be founded upon the principles of democracy. While I am sure that the intentions of the United States in Iraq are honourable, I don't think that an imposed democracy would have the capacity to stand the test of time — if a constitutional crisis were ever to arise, I fear that such a nation (for example, Iraq) would suffer a lapse in governance, and the figurative implosion of its democratic institutions.
:arrow: Weapons of Mass Destruction
In terms of weapons of mass destruction, I think it should be clear, at this point, that whether or not His Excellency the Honourable George Bush, President of the United States of America had intended, the citizens of America were misinformed; I would think it to be somewhat conclusive, by now, that weapons of mass destruction were not present (at least in any of the forms contended by the United States) in the Republic of Iraq.
However, in my opinion, it remains unclear as to whether or not the President had been aware of the extreme possibility of the errors in his announcements to the American people. Nonetheless, I would hope that the President would have thought it appropriate to address the nation and retract any incorrect information, once he had been made aware of any such errors — however, transparency has not been a highlight of this current Bush Administration.
:arrow: Democracy in Iraq
I have a sincere hope that Iraq can be made into a democratic nation; however, I have doubts that this can be achieved at this time. I have asserted in the past, and would do so again today, that a true democracy, one which is to stand without the "parenting" of another nation, must be founded upon the principles of democracy. While I am sure that the intentions of the United States in Iraq are honourable, I don't think that an imposed democracy would have the capacity to stand the test of time — if a constitutional crisis were ever to arise, I fear that such a nation (for example, Iraq) would suffer a lapse in governance, and the figurative implosion of its democratic institutions.
Alfonz you can't tell me what to do. :lol:Jersay said:
I think Saddam had WMD's that were moved by Russia into Syria before the start of the War, that link I posted is a possibility.
Re: RE: Bush again questions on WMDs
Bwahahahaha!
Ahahaha!
Ha!
I have no clue what you were trying to convey here,I sure hope you do.
darkbeaver said:
Bwahahahaha!
Ahahaha!
Ha!
darkbeaver said:
I have no clue what you were trying to convey here,I sure hope you do.
Re: RE: Bush again questions on WMDs
I'll take a shot in the dark and say you are refering to the "evil corporations", if not, please elaborate.
cortezzz said:
I'll take a shot in the dark and say you are refering to the "evil corporations", if not, please elaborate.
Re: RE: Bush again questions on WMDs
What chance are you talking about??
they have been under united sanctions for 13 years, they have been constantly under bomb raid during those sanctions, both gulf war, now they are under illegal occupation for more than 3years now, with their crazy civil war and it is getting worst,4 OIL COORPORATION ARE SUCKING THEIR RESSOURCES, AND THEY ARE US AND UK COORPORATIONS, so what do you exactly mean, by a chance?? yoou are being cynical at the best.
jimmoyer said:
What chance are you talking about??
they have been under united sanctions for 13 years, they have been constantly under bomb raid during those sanctions, both gulf war, now they are under illegal occupation for more than 3years now, with their crazy civil war and it is getting worst,4 OIL COORPORATION ARE SUCKING THEIR RESSOURCES, AND THEY ARE US AND UK COORPORATIONS, so what do you exactly mean, by a chance?? yoou are being cynical at the best.