Bomber Harris thought the Dambusters' attacks on Germany 'achieved nothing'

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,998
1,915
113
To this day, the British people view the Dambusters (617 Squadron of the RAF) as brave heroes, who took part in one of the most daring (and ingenious) operations of World War II, a lasting symbol of Britain's gallant fight against Nazi tyranny, an example of what might happen when evil regimes led by mustachioed twerps with nothing better to do make Great Britain angry and leave her fighting for her survival as an independent, free nation.

In May 1943, RAF Lancasters dropped bouncing bombs on reservoirs in Germany's industrial heartland and destroyed two dams, causing severe flooding. This led to the widespread destruction of homes, factories, bridges, railways, farmland and energy supplies, though a third dam, on the Sorpe, remained intact.

Prior to the war, the industrial heartland of Germany had been identified by the Air Ministry as an important strategic target and the dams of the area considered as particular targets. Besides providing power they were used to provide water into the canal transport system.

The bouncing bombs were ingenious. The British engineer and inventor Barnes Wallis invented them, after realising that the Germans dams could be breached by bombs which bounced along the water to the dams, reach the dam's thick wall, sink below the surface and then detonate at the optimum depth, and unleashing colossal flooding into the surrounding area.

Many people at first thought the bombs wouldn't work, including Air Marshal Sir Arthur "Bomber" Harris, one of the chief architects of the raid. He thought the RAF's Lancaster bombers should concentrate on turning Germany's cities to rubble.

Even as late as 1945, Bomber Harris wrote in a latter: "The destruction of the Mohne and Eder dams was to achieve wonders.

"It achieved nothing compared with the effort and the loss."

However, the Germans thought the British HAD achieved something worthwile. Contrary to Harris's arguments, Albert Speer, the German Minister for Armaments, said that the raid was "a disaster for us for a number of months".

In total, 54 of the 133 aircrew who participated in the attack were killed and although 3 aircrew from an aircraft bailed out successfully, one later died from wounds whilst the others were captured, thus the operation totalled a casualty rate of almost 40%. Of the survivors, 33 were decorated at Buckingham Palace on 22 June, with Guy Gibson, the CO of 617 Squadron, awarded the Victoria Cross. There were 5 Distinguished Service Orders, 10 Distinguished Flying Crosses and four bars, 12 Distinguished Flying Medals and 2 Conspicuous Gallantry Medals.

Bomber Harris thought the Dambusters' attacks on Germany 'achieved nothing'

Sir Arthur "Bomber" Harris, the wartime head of Bomber Command, privately dismissed the Dambuster air raids on German dams as a waste of men and aircraft, it has been revealed.

By Leo McKinstry
15 Aug 2009
The Telegraph


It has now emerged that Air Marshal Sir Arthur "Bomber" Harris, one of the chief architects of the raid, was privately scathing about its effectiveness


One of the Dambusters' bouncing bombs

It has gone down in history as the most daring RAF operation of the Second World War. With its mix of heroism and technical ingenuity, the Dambusters Raid became a lasting symbol of Britain's gallant fight against the Nazi regime.

In Winston Churchill's words, the destruction of two key dams in May 1943 brought "unparalleled devastation" to Germany's western industrial heartland. The success of the mission brought widespread public acclaim.


With its mix of heroism and technical ingenuity, the 1943 Dambusters Raid became a lasting symbol of Britain's gallant fight against the Nazi regime.

Yet it has now emerged that Air Marshal Sir Arthur "Bomber" Harris, one of the chief architects of the raid, was privately scathing about its effectiveness.

Research in the archives of the Harris papers, stored in the RAF Museum at Hendon, north London, has revealed that he privately thought the assault on German dams was a waste of men and aircraft.

In one letter to the Air Staff, written in Dec 1943, just six months after the raid, Harris said: "For years we have been told that the destruction of the Mohne and Eder dams alone would be a vital blow to Germany."

But, he continued, "I have seen nothing in the present circumstances or in the Ministry of Economic Warfare reports to show that the effort was worthwhile."

Even as the legend of the Dambusters grew, Harris kept up this disparaging theme.

In a private letter to Sir Charles Portal, the Chief of the Air Staff, written in Jan 1945, Harris complained: "The destruction of the Mohne and Eder dams was to achieve wonders.



"It achieved nothing compared with the effort and the loss."

He concluded: "The material damage was negligible compared with one small area attack."

The correspondence shows that Harris was just as sceptical about the raid when the plans were initially put forward.

It was Barnes Wallis, the inventor and aeronautical engineer, who in 1942 had come up with the idea that each dam could be breached by a bouncing bomb.

Carried by a specially-modified Avro Lancaster, the RAF's new four-engine heavy bomber, the unconventional bomb would leap over the water, reach the dam's thick wall, sink below the surface and then detonate at the optimum depth, thereby unleashing a colossal flood tide into the surrounding area.

Early tests on the bouncing bomb, conducted at Chesil Beach in Dorset, revealed that the scheme was practical. The Air Ministry was quickly won over.

But, as the unpublished documents reveal, Harris was outraged. He thought his precious Lancasters should be allowed to concentrate on Bomber Command's primary task of reducing Germany's cities to rubble.

When first informed of Wallis' proposal by Robert Saundby, his deputy at Bomber Command, in Feb 1943, he produced a scathing denunciation.

The bouncing bomb was "tripe beyond the wildest description. There are so many ifs and buts that there is not the smallest chance of it working."

Harris urged that Air Staff should be stopped from "putting aside Lancasters and reducing our effort on this wild goose chase". The war, he warned, "will be over before it works and it never will".

A few days later, his opposition to the plan had only intensified. In a letter to his superior, Sir Charles Portal, he described the bouncing bomb as "just about the maddest proposition as a weapon we have yet to come across".



Deprecating "any diversion of Lancasters at this critical moment", he told Portal that "I am prepared to bet my shirt" that the bomb could not be produced within six months and "will not work when we have got it".

He hoped that the new weapon's enthusiasts would be "given one aeroplane to go away and play while we get on with the war".

Harris, however, was overruled by Portal, the RAF's chief, who was determined to press ahead with the plan. For all his doubts, the bomber commander had no choice but to obey his orders from the top of Air Staff.

To carry out the raid, he formed a new Lancaster squadron, named 617, under the leadership of Wing Commander Guy Gibson, a dynamic, brave and highly experienced pilot.

Meanwhile, the Lancaster aircraft were adapted by the Avro company to carry the special equipment for the bouncing bomb.

The raid took place in bright moonlight on the night of May 16 and into the early hours of May 17.

Harris's claim that the bouncing bomb would fail proved hopelessly unfounded, as the successful breaches of the Mohne and the Eder led to the widespread destruction of homes, factories, bridges, railways, farmland and energy supplies, though a third dam, on the Sorpe, remained intact.

Contrary to Harris's later arguments, Albert Speer, the German Minister for Armaments, said that raid was "a disaster for us for a number of months".

Germany had to divert 20,000 labourers from building defences in France and Holland into repairing the dams, something that had a significant impact at D-Day.

Gibson won the Victoria Cross and his squadron became national heroes. The raid gave an enormous boost to British morale.

The triumph came at a heavy price, as eight out of 19 Lancasters on the raid were lost and 54 crew men were killed. But, unlike Harris, most of the RAF and the British public believed the sacrifice was worthwhile.

* Leo McKinstry's book "Lancaster: The Second World War's Greatest Bomber" is published in September by John Murray

telegraph.co.uk
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Heroic and brave, certainly. However, if Germany had carried out such a raid on British dams and killed a similar number of British civilians, most people would have labeled such attacks war crimes. As WW II progressed, bomber command began to focus more of their attacks on purely civilian targets, culminating in the 1945 Dresden firestorm.

In 1941 Charles Portal of the British Air Staff advocated that entire cities and towns should be bombed. Portal claimed that this would quickly bring about the collapse of civilian morale in Germany. Air Marshall Arthur Harris agreed and when he became head of RAF Bomber Command in February 1942, he introduced a policy of area bombing (known in Germany as terror bombing) where entire cities and towns were targeted.

One tactic used by the Royal Air Force and the United States Army Air Force was the creation of firestorms. This was achieved by dropping incendiary bombs, filled with highly combustible chemicals such as magnesium, phosphorus or petroleum jelly (napalm), in clusters over a specific target. After the area caught fire, the air above the bombed area, become extremely hot and rose rapidly. Cold air then rushed in at ground level from the outside and people were sucked into the fire.

In 1945, Arthur Harris decided to create a firestorm in the medieval city of Dresden. He considered it a good target as it had not been attacked during the war and was virtually undefended by anti-aircraft guns. The population of the city was now far greater than the normal 650,000 due to the large numbers of refugees fleeing from the advancing Red Army...

Bombing of Dresden

See also
Bombing of Dresden in World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Today, bombing hydro-electric dams and dropping napalm on cities would be considered war crimes. I am aware WW II was a total war. But I disagree with glorifying mass destruction or the wanton killing of tens of thousands of civilians.

War is a nasty business.