Here's a scattered omnibus of thoughts:
Communism least follows the psychology of
the people.
It has great appeal to those disgusted with
corruption, but then so has every system resulted
in incidents of corruption.
"To each according to his needs" speaks to
the differences among us, but implies a
central authority
that determines such allocation.
Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations in 1776 was every
bit more powerful and more enduring than the
Communist Manifesto, and Karl Marx should have
learned a little more from Hegel on some matters.
By the way, if you're an old 60's hippie like me
you'll have seen close up how hard it is to run a
commune.
Anything run by a central committee is ultimately disastrous as they determine "each according to
his needs."
Long live McGovern's memory, on this day
of Nixon's birthday of Jan 9, 1913, the year the
Senate of America moved from being appointed
by state legislatures to direct popular Winner Take
All vote.
Down with the Neocons, communists, angry left
wingers.
Who's left ?