Andrew Scheer would make the best PM: Poll

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,543
8,146
113
B.C.
I feel like Scheer we would good for the white nationalist climate change deniers but not for Canadians in general.

He wants the anti immigrant vote - he can have it. But don't come knocking on the door of normal people.
Normal people like you ?
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
He is going to need to step his game up a bunch.

The "I didn't hear the question" thing is not working.
 

TalkingTogheter

Electoral Member
Dec 15, 2018
292
0
16
The Neocon choice in its program a smaller amount of refugees than The current president but I might prefer Scheer, however, should be said.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
No one, not one person at all, is good enough to be PM right now.

I wouldn't trust any PC or PC like party in power what so ever, which is sad because there are times I think a decent, old school PC Parliament might actually be good.

NDP is a nogo.

Liberal is waning on popularity and good governing but right now of them all I'd rather see them than anyone else.




SO WHO DO YOU SUPPORT THEN?????????????????????????


The Communist Party of Canada?????????????????????????????


Here is some information illustrating how UTTERLY HYPOCRITICAL LIE-berals routinely are even on something as supposedly simple as applying for a gun license!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!







Here are some comments picked up from a Rebel Media youtube video!

By Faith Goldy: Special gun rights for Muslims?

Published on Youtube April 21, 2017.

Goldy is a gun owner and was in the process of renewing her gun licence when she spotted an odd paragraph about photographs and religious exemptions!

On camera- she then telephoned RCMP and explained to them she was a FULLY VEILED WOMAN - she went on to explain she wore a NIQAB and was prevented by religious edict from showing her face!

Goldy and the Licensing Officer then discussed the relevant paragraphs of the gvot legislation that EXEMPTS SOME PEOPLE from supplying the photo ID that NORMAL PEOPLE MUST SUPPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To sum up- in order to get a gun licence - FOR EITHER A LONG GUN -meaning shotgun or rifle- or get a licence for RESTRICTED WEAPONS - WITHOUT SUBMITTING A PHOTO - one only has to submit an attestation from an IMAM to dispense with photo ID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As Goldy points out - this is a HUGE LOOPHOLE in the law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I note that ONE MUSLIM could complete the fire arm training and then make MULTIPLE gun license applications since NOBODY KNOWS WHO is under the NIQAB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The absolute NEED - for security purposes- to DEMAND that Muslim women remove their NIQAB and IDENTIFY THEMSELVES PROPERLY is growing ever more obvious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AS Toronto Sun pointed out - the NIQAB cancels out all sorts of security deals! The Sun dressed a 14 year old BOY in a NIQAB and sent the kid off to buy liquor at various LCBO locations in Toronto................................

AND NOBODY CHALLENGED the under age kid in the bopdy sack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Muslims MUST BE COMPELLED to identify themselves clearly and properly for taking tests at college or university, for filing govt forms such as gun license and drivers license and for situations dealing with cops and for testimony in court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In addition there have been incidents reported of Muslim women attacking white people for using cmaeras in a public place. In one incident- a white Sun reporter was with his family at Dundas Square- an OBVIOUSLY PUBLIC PLACE!!!!!!!!!

And he took several photos and was lining up for another when a shadow fell over his lense and something slapped at his head! Turns out it was a Muslim woman slapping at him and DEMANDING he give her his expensive camera!!!!!!!!!!!

When he refused - she slapped at him again and then was joined by a couple more Muslim women and their husbands......all demanding he hand over the camera!

A cop was called over and refereed the argument! The woman protested that they HAD NOT ATTACKED THE MAN! They told the cop they were ONLY TRYING TO SMASH HIS CAMERA -because they feared he might have taken some photos of the Muslim women!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The cop tried to defuse the white mans anger by pointing out they were not actually threatening HIM! They were just worried about unsuitable photos!!!!!!!!

But as the white guy pointed out- what IF THEY HAD SMASHED THE CAMERA AS THEY INTENDED??

HOW could he press charges against people he could not identify since they were wrapped up an those BODY COVERING SACKS???????????

In that situation -the was ATTACKED and his property threatened with DAMAGE - with no way to take legal action since the attacker were essentially IN DISGUISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There ARE LAWS that punish white people for committing crimes while in disguise so WHY NOT APPLY THEM AGAINST MUSLIMS????????????

And there was another incident in east end Toronto with another white guy and his girl friend out taking photos while her guy walks his dog.............................and same deal.....Angry Muslims DEMANDING the girl hand over her camera to a bunch of Muslims!!

Girl moves to hide behind boyfriend and shield her camera from angry grabbing hands trying to snatch it from her...........and things get even worse!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dog gets agitated and is barking and etc and Muslims consider dogs to be UNCLEAN and they are angry enough that photos of their woman MAY HAVE accidentally been taken- but to have to contend with the dog IS REAL INSULT FOR THEM!!!!!!!!!!!

Tolerance is one thing..........but total surrender to the DEMANDS of radical minded intruders that LIE-berl govt has FORCED ON US is not acceptable!!!!!!!!!

MUSLIMS MUST learn to tolerate the NORMAL standards of Csdn behaviour!!!!

And LIE-beral failure to make it clear that proper ID IS ESSENTIAL in all legal dealings is a huge mistake that leaves us vulnerable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

TalkingTogheter

Electoral Member
Dec 15, 2018
292
0
16
SO WHO DO YOU SUPPORT THEN?????????????????????????


The Communist Party of Canada?????????????????????????????


Here is some information illustrating how UTTERLY HYPOCRITICAL LIE-berals routinely are even on something as supposedly simple as applying for a gun license!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Here are some comments picked up from a Rebel Media youtube video!
By Faith Goldy: Special gun rights for Muslims?
Published on Youtube April 21, 2017.
Goldy is a gun owner and was in the process of renewing her gun licence when she spotted an odd paragraph about photographs and religious exemptions!
On camera- she then telephoned RCMP and explained to them she was a FULLY VEILED WOMAN - she went on to explain she wore a NIQAB and was prevented by religious edict from showing her face!
Goldy and the Licensing Officer then discussed the relevant paragraphs of the gvot legislation that EXEMPTS SOME PEOPLE from supplying the photo ID that NORMAL PEOPLE MUST SUPPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To sum up- in order to get a gun licence - FOR EITHER A LONG GUN -meaning shotgun or rifle- or get a licence for RESTRICTED WEAPONS - WITHOUT SUBMITTING A PHOTO - one only has to submit an attestation from an IMAM to dispense with photo ID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As Goldy points out - this is a HUGE LOOPHOLE in the law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I note that ONE MUSLIM could complete the fire arm training and then make MULTIPLE gun license applications since NOBODY KNOWS WHO is under the NIQAB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The absolute NEED - for security purposes- to DEMAND that Muslim women remove their NIQAB and IDENTIFY THEMSELVES PROPERLY is growing ever more obvious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AS Toronto Sun pointed out - the NIQAB cancels out all sorts of security deals! The Sun dressed a 14 year old BOY in a NIQAB and sent the kid off to buy liquor at various LCBO locations in Toronto................................
AND NOBODY CHALLENGED the under age kid in the bopdy sack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muslims MUST BE COMPELLED to identify themselves clearly and properly for taking tests at college or university, for filing govt forms such as gun license and drivers license and for situations dealing with cops and for testimony in court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In addition there have been incidents reported of Muslim women attacking white people for using cmaeras in a public place. In one incident- a white Sun reporter was with his family at Dundas Square- an OBVIOUSLY PUBLIC PLACE!!!!!!!!!
And he took several photos and was lining up for another when a shadow fell over his lense and something slapped at his head! Turns out it was a Muslim woman slapping at him and DEMANDING he give her his expensive camera!!!!!!!!!!!
When he refused - she slapped at him again and then was joined by a couple more Muslim women and their husbands......all demanding he hand over the camera!
A cop was called over and refereed the argument! The woman protested that they HAD NOT ATTACKED THE MAN! They told the cop they were ONLY TRYING TO SMASH HIS CAMERA -because they feared he might have taken some photos of the Muslim women!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The cop tried to defuse the white mans anger by pointing out they were not actually threatening HIM! They were just worried about unsuitable photos!!!!!!!!
But as the white guy pointed out- what IF THEY HAD SMASHED THE CAMERA AS THEY INTENDED??
HOW could he press charges against people he could not identify since they were wrapped up an those BODY COVERING SACKS???????????
In that situation -the was ATTACKED and his property threatened with DAMAGE - with no way to take legal action since the attacker were essentially IN DISGUISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There ARE LAWS that punish white people for committing crimes while in disguise so WHY NOT APPLY THEM AGAINST MUSLIMS????????????
And there was another incident in east end Toronto with another white guy and his girl friend out taking photos while her guy walks his dog.............................and same deal.....Angry Muslims DEMANDING the girl hand over her camera to a bunch of Muslims!!
Girl moves to hide behind boyfriend and shield her camera from angry grabbing hands trying to snatch it from her...........and things get even worse!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dog gets agitated and is barking and etc and Muslims consider dogs to be UNCLEAN and they are angry enough that photos of their woman MAY HAVE accidentally been taken- but to have to contend with the dog IS REAL INSULT FOR THEM!!!!!!!!!!!
Tolerance is one thing..........but total surrender to the DEMANDS of radical minded intruders that LIE-berl govt has FORCED ON US is not acceptable!!!!!!!!!
MUSLIMS MUST learn to tolerate the NORMAL standards of Csdn behaviour!!!!
And LIE-beral failure to make it clear that proper ID IS ESSENTIAL in all legal dealings is a huge mistake that leaves us vulnerable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But you are supporting isis as your character of Russian stance.

You hate everything.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Mayor of Calgary on CBC saying that Kenney and Scheer are both pandering to racists.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
The only poll that means anything is going to be held on October 21.
 

TalkingTogheter

Electoral Member
Dec 15, 2018
292
0
16
Thinking of music is very good in USA, Mexico, Canada, Cuba, Brazil and in the EU, but Russian communists think it is worse with music, but the whole EU likes enormous legal music.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Give the Liberal Party to Wilson-raybould and the Conservative Party to Lisa Raitt. We need people with more intellect leading these parties.
No one is given the leadership of a political party, WU. Leaders are elected at conventions by all members of the party. As for Wilson-Raybould, her pariah status would effectively eliminate her from even being considered as a candidate. There are consequences to one's actions - or non-actions as the case may be.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Well, if the vest fits

10's of thousands of actual workers have to wear these vests on job sites all across this country every day are they viewed as anti immigrants as well? So why should the opposition be allowed to smear supporters of the oil patch in this way?
 

TalkingTogheter

Electoral Member
Dec 15, 2018
292
0
16
No one is given the leadership of a political party, WU. Leaders are elected at conventions by all members of the party. As for Wilson-Raybould, her pariah status would effectively eliminate her from even being considered as a candidate. There are consequences to one's actions - or non-actions as the case may be.

Its truly.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,543
8,146
113
B.C.
10's of thousands of actual workers have to wear these vests on job sites all across this country every day are they viewed as anti immigrants as well? So why should the opposition be allowed to smear supporters of the oil patch in this way?
Including many who are actual immigrants.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Nobody is smearing anyone who wears high visibility clothing on a job site.

I think they are mainly talking about the folks who wear them to protests.

There is a difference there that perhaps needs to be explained to you.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Explain what? Interpreting the difference between France and Canada? Statements by officials that they are in support to the Oil patch workers only? What is it that needs explaining to you?