A revolution in thought

[Tecumsehsbones]

You're right, they are two different things, but he should have said what he meant. He wasn't interested, not that he understood the book and for that reason he wasn't interested. Moreover, how do you know I'm biased when you haven't read the book? You are the one that appears biased.

Pardon me, where did I say I understood the book and for that reason I wasn't interested? A quote will do nicely.