I remember when a petition went around , I think it was about Canadians against Bush, and some guy on Canada kicks ass who was extremely pro Bush and pro war figured out who Revs name was. Could be that guy.
A real heartbreaker!!!!
- Thread starter peapod
- Start date
I remember when a petition went around , I think it was about Canadians against Bush, and some guy on Canada kicks ass who was extremely pro Bush and pro war figured out who Revs name was. Could be that guy.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. HTe only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. HTe only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. HTe only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. The only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. The only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nothing pains me more than to defend FreeDominion. The only place I have ever been banned.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Though defending the right to congergate depends not on the quality or purpose of the congregation.
Unless it steps over the legal limit of the law.
FreeDominion did not. An attack on FreeDominon for having views expressed is an attack on the right of all of us to have and express our views no matter how how how how......
To committ illegal attacks against my political counterpart is to attack my political process.
Nope...I figured it out, kind of. It was the ILF who got my address. I'm not sure where they pulled it from or why. I had gotten their original press release in an e-mail but it had no subject and listed, "Republican First" as the sender. I figured it was just some Christian group begging for money, so I deleted it without opening it.
I've been trying to get a hold of the ILF guys though...I thought I might do a story on them. They don't seem big on returning e-mails though. I hope they aren't locked up in some CIA dungeon someplace with sacks on their heads.
Nope...I figured it out, kind of. It was the ILF who got my address. I'm not sure where they pulled it from or why. I had gotten their original press release in an e-mail but it had no subject and listed, "Republican First" as the sender. I figured it was just some Christian group begging for money, so I deleted it without opening it.
I've been trying to get a hold of the ILF guys though...I thought I might do a story on them. They don't seem big on returning e-mails though. I hope they aren't locked up in some CIA dungeon someplace with sacks on their heads.
Nope...I figured it out, kind of. It was the ILF who got my address. I'm not sure where they pulled it from or why. I had gotten their original press release in an e-mail but it had no subject and listed, "Republican First" as the sender. I figured it was just some Christian group begging for money, so I deleted it without opening it.
I've been trying to get a hold of the ILF guys though...I thought I might do a story on them. They don't seem big on returning e-mails though. I hope they aren't locked up in some CIA dungeon someplace with sacks on their heads.