6th British soldier dies in Afghanistan.

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Re: Afghanistan • Five's Second Intervention

I am going to offer another intervention.

JonB2004, I was trying to come up with some information to further prove to you that our mission in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is indeed warranted, and came across some information that, after having read pages of the information, I left the site feeling more informed, and even more comfortable, with the position that Canada has chosen to take in relation to our mission in Afghanistan. In particular, I found this passage that I would like to quote for your pleasure.

The Web site for the [color=blue said:
Department of National Defence[/color]]Canadian efforts in Afghanistan have contributed significantly to the overall consolidation of peace and the improvement of human security in the region. The next phase of Canadian operations in Afghanistan will continue to help improve the quality of life for the Afghan people, and to ensure that the progress made is sustainable.
I think that this quote quite sums up our purpose for being there.

Throughout our presence in Afghanistan, throughout Operation APOLLO, Operation ALTAIR, Operation ATHENA, and now Operation ARCHER (I think, if I understand the documentation—it uses lots of terms that I'm not familiar with, perhaps Mogz can enlighten me as to our present operation [it is ARCHER, right?]), Canada has been there for the purpose of ensuring that our own future is all-the-more safer from acts of possible terrorism.

Perhaps more importantly than our own security, though, is the principle of the matter—we are there for the purpose of not only Canadian security, but for human security. Some things transcend borders, and I would suggest that the type of horrid acts that are sometimes committed against one another are certainly one of those things.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
RE: 6th British soldier d

1. Operation Archer, you're right Five. Op Archer stood up February 2006 in Kandahar.

2.
Perhaps more importantly than our own security, though, is the principle of the matter—we are there for the purpose of not only Canadian security, but for human security. Some things transcend borders, and I would suggest that the type of horrid acts that are sometimes committed against one another are certainly one of those things.

You've, as per usual, hit the nail on the head. We're there to promote global security as well as help promote local security. Both objectives go hand in hand.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

I think not said:
Karzai was never a Unocal advisor, you can't even get your conspiracy theories straight.




http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html

Cool and worldly, Karzai is a former employee of US oil company Unocal – one of two main oil companies that was bidding for the lucrative contract to build an oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through Afghanistan to seaports in Pakistan
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

aeon said:
I think not said:
Karzai was never a Unocal advisor, you can't even get your conspiracy theories straight.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html

Cool and worldly, Karzai is a former employee of US oil company Unocal – one of two main oil companies that was bidding for the lucrative contract to build an oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through Afghanistan to seaports in Pakistan

France's Le Monde started this garbage, when the article was written in December of 2002, Le Monde cited an unnamed source that Karzai was related to Unocal. Karzai and Unocal have denied it. Show some proof other than leftist blather Karzai was employed by Unocal at any capacity. Go ahead, try.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, was a Unocal consultant in the mid-1990s.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

I think not said:
aeon said:
I think not said:
Karzai was never a Unocal advisor, you can't even get your conspiracy theories straight.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0610/p01s03e-wosc.html

Cool and worldly, Karzai is a former employee of US oil company Unocal – one of two main oil companies that was bidding for the lucrative contract to build an oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through Afghanistan to seaports in Pakistan

France's Le Monde started this garbage, when the article was written in December of 2002, Le Monde cited an unnamed source that Karzai was related to Unocal. Karzai and Unocal have denied it. Show some proof other than leftist blather Karzai was employed by Unocal at any capacity. Go ahead, try.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, was a Unocal consultant in the mid-1990s.

ITN, my dear friend, leftist blather is all he has. If you do managed to get aeon to be rational for five minutes and perhaps admit he's wrong (highly unlikely), do you think you could come over later and help me get blood from my pet rock? Then teach my pet pig how to fly?
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

Mogz said:
ITN, my dear friend, leftist blather is all he has. If you do managed to get aeon to be rational for five minutes and perhaps admit he's wrong (highly unlikely), do you think you could come over later and help me get blood from my pet rock? Then teach my pet pig how to fly?

Gladly, but don't get your hopes up it's going to be anytime soon.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

I think not said:
France's Le Monde started this garbage, when the article was written in December of 2002, Le Monde cited an unnamed source that Karzai was related to Unocal. Karzai and Unocal have denied it. Show some proof other than leftist blather Karzai was employed by Unocal at any capacity. Go ahead, try.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, was a Unocal consultant in the mid-1990s.


True, Zalmay Khalizaed was a unocal consultant in the mid-1990's also part of the PNAC morons groups.

Even if karzai and unocal denied, means absotly nothing, those guys has a tremendous score of denying things. it is well documented that karzai already worked for them, that is just fact.

http://www.thenation.com/docprem.mhtml?i=20040216&s=kleveman

Afghan President Hamid Karzai, a former Unocal adviser, signed a treaty with Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf and the Turkmen dictator Saparmurat Niyazov to authorize construction of a $3.2 billion gas pipeline through the Heart-Kandahar corridor in Afghanistan
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

aeon said:
Even if karzai and unocal denied, means absotly nothing, those guys has a tremendous score of denying things. it is well documented that karzai already worked for them, that is just fact.

OK, show me the well documented facts.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Even if karzai and unocal denied, means absotly nothing, those guys has a tremendous score of denying things. it is well documented that karzai already worked for them, that is just fact.

So if someone says someone wasn't an employee, that doesn't mean anything? Do you even listen to yourself? The guy never worked for unocal. As ITN pointed out Le Monde never cited their source. Curious no? You stamping your feeting and saying he was employed by unocal doesn't make it true aeon. It's amazing how in one instance the lack of evidence (in your opinion) regarding Afghanistan means the War was predicated on a lie. Then in another instance the lack of evidence means it's a cover up. Which is it aeon. Is Afghanistan legit based on the lack of "evidence" or was Karzai not an employee of unocal based on the lack of "evidence". I can answer that for you; evidence only means something if it goes along with your moronic spin on the planet. Aeon, i'm not saying this to be a jerk, or to start a fight. Seek professional help. I'm not even kidding. I'm honestly concerned you're a danger to society. I wish I was joking about that.
 

JonB2004

Council Member
Mar 10, 2006
1,188
0
36
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

Mogz said:
I'm not OK with people getting murdered, but the what the *censored* do you expect me to say? It didn't happen in our *censored* country, so in my opinion, its not our *censored* problem. Here an example for Afghanistan. Let's say the kid next door hits your brother. Well, its your brother's *censored* problem to deal with it. Not you. Get it or are you too *censored* dense?

So if your mother flies to Europe and is murdered by a thief, that isn't any concern of the Department of Foreign Affairs or this Nation in general? Might want to look back through the news and find the issue that arose from a Canadian coupled being murdered in Mexico. Sadly Jon, what happens to our citizens, regardless of where they are at the time, IS a Canadian issue. Come on Jon, take off the social blindfold and realize that in a perfect World, and a perfect World only, each Nation would keep to itself. We live in reality, and the ramifications of what happens in one Nation can have disasterous repercussions in another. As for the whole "kid next door" analogy, actually, if you had a brother (or if you do, were any kind of brother yourself) you'd slap the kid around. I've got a brother 4 years younger than me, and throughout school I beat the crap out of older kids that picked on him. Then again, judging by the way you think, that ideology would be a foreign concept to you. Standing up for your friends and family.

And I don't say I want free *censored* money from the government. Canadians pay taxes, well why shouldn't they get that money back. I don't want to sit on my ass all my life, which is what you seem to be suggesting. I want to get a job, and get through university. Quit making assumptions, dumbass.

Everything i've ever read from you vis-a-vis Afghanistan, has fallen back to (and i'm paraphrasing here), you screaming "where's my money!".

And as for taking steps to protect Canada. Well first of all, we can ban travel to terrorist-harbouring nations and we can deny immigrants from those kinds of countries from coming into Canada. That would at least be a start.

So you're suggesting that we, in essence, begin limiting where our citizens can travel? In other words, impede on their RIGHT to live free? That would be counter to everything this Nation stands for. Secondly, deny immigration from those kinds of countries? Sure fine, we put in to motion an UTTER BAN on a class of people. First off, that goes against everything that is Canadian. Secondly, it wouldn't solve the problem. Ever hear of illegal immigration Jon? That's a huge problem that both Canada and the United States face. Our borders are too large to prevent people from slipping in, and frankly, anyone that would intend to come to this Nation to cause harm, would most likely do so in a covert manner. Lastly, and in my opinion, most importantly, does a terrorist need to be a Canadian citizen to cause harm to Canadians? The answer Jon, is no. A great example is the Bali Bombing of 2002. The attack killed 202 people. People on vacation. Lets say for a second that we utterly close our border to everyone meeting a cetain description (racial profiling), and that we utterly forbid Canadians from travelling to a LENGTHY list of Nations (breaching the very moral core of our society), do you think that'll somehow make us safe? What's to stop a terrorist organization from blowing up Canada House in London? Or sinking a cruise liner full of Canadian vacationers? You'd in a sense have us turtle like cowards instead of solve the problem.

And all of those conflicts you speak of, they all took place on the other side of the *censored* world. Far away from Canada. Let those people work out their own *censored* problems.

YOu're right, the other side of the World. But what i've been saying all along Jon is that what happens in one Nation, can easily spread to another. A great example is World War II. Do you think, that if we'd just left Europe to itself, the problem would have gone away? I'm not sure if you're fully aware, but in 1941, Germany had Europe at it's knees, and while no one (other than those fully educated) will admit it, Canada saved Europe from total annexation. Post Evacuation of Dunqurque, Canada comprised the only land force capable of defending England against German invasion (the British Army was shattered and had left almost ALL of its equipment behind in France). Furthermore the RCAF put at the RAFs disposal large amounts of trained figher pilots, ground crews, and aircraft. Without our help (and that of the Poles and Free French), Germany would have won the Battle of Britain and launched Operation Sealion (the invasion of England). If Germany were to have succeeded in conquering England (which they would have easily), how would the War have turned out Jon? Where could a force attempting to liberate England stage from? The answer is no where. With the fall of England, Germany would have won. They would have turned their full attention to Russian and utterly conquered them as well. Europe, to this day, would be a German Empire. So your stance of "let those people work their *censored* problems out" is highly ignorant. I've said it already in this thread Jon, and i'll say it again; when a Nation is in a position of wealth and military ability, like Canada is, it behooves said Nation to contribute what it can to World stability and prosperity. You speak like the other Nations of the World that aren't as well off as us, or in as great shape should deal with their own problems. To that I pose this question; why do our cities have police officers? If we were to embody your mantra, everyone would deal with their own problem. That young girl being raped would have to fight off her attacker, or be raped because she was just too weak. The old man being mugged should have to combat the thugs for his wallet, or lose it due to weakness. That's what your stance is when put under the microscope Jon; self-reliance. Sadly, that "perfect world" (in your opinion) doesn't exist. Weaker people exist and therefore Police exist. Weaker Nations exist, therefore stronger Nations sacrifice their time, money, and people to help them. We deployed to Cyprus to stop people from killing eachother. We went to Somalia to feed starving people. We have deployed NOW to Afghanistan to stop the oppression of Afghans and prevent the terrorist promoting regime of that Nation from ever re-establishing itself, and thus endangering our way of life and killing more Canadians.


Well, I hate to say it but you're right. If a Canadian is killed anywhere in the world, it is our business to intervene. And my analogy wasn't the greatest. And yes, if someone was beating on my brother, I would beat the crap out of them. I'm sorry about all of that. And that history lesson has opened my eyes. It was our place to intervene in all of those wars.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

JonB2004 said:
Well, I hate to say it but you're right. If a Canadian is killed anywhere in the world, it is our business to intervene. And my analogy wasn't the greatest. And yes, if someone was beating on my brother, I would beat the crap out of them. I'm sorry about all of that. And that history lesson has opened my eyes. It was our place to intervene in all of those wars.

Another glimmer of hope for you. Well done.

EDIT: I think Mogzy should adopt you or something. :D
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Well, I hate to say it but you're right. If a Canadian is killed anywhere in the world, it is our business to intervene. And my analogy wasn't the greatest. And yes, if someone was beating on my brother, I would beat the crap out of them. I'm sorry about all of that. And that history lesson has opened my eyes. It was our place to intervene in all of those wars.

Barring any unforseen sarcastic backlash, I do believe this calls for a Bud Light.

*spikes the keyboard*

MOGZ TAKES THE WIN!
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

I think not said:
JonB2004 said:
Well, I hate to say it but you're right. If a Canadian is killed anywhere in the world, it is our business to intervene. And my analogy wasn't the greatest. And yes, if someone was beating on my brother, I would beat the crap out of them. I'm sorry about all of that. And that history lesson has opened my eyes. It was our place to intervene in all of those wars.

Another glimmer of hope for you. Well done.

EDIT: I think Mogzy should adopt you or something. :D


I tried adopting Jay....look how that turned out....where is that f.ucker anyway?
 

JonB2004

Council Member
Mar 10, 2006
1,188
0
36
RE: 6th British soldier d

Well, Mogz, you win. You're right and I'm sorry. Am I forgiven?
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

I think not said:
aeon said:
Even if karzai and unocal denied, means absotly nothing, those guys has a tremendous score of denying things. it is well documented that karzai already worked for them, that is just fact.

OK, show me the well documented facts.



The nation, le monde, reuters and turan news agency all says the same, they didnt retracted what they have claimed, nice try.


http://www.anomalous-images.com/news/news699.html
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

JonB2004 said:
Well, Mogz, you win. You're right and I'm sorry. Am I forgiven?

Forgiven? For what? You didn't do anything wrong.

The nation, le monde, reuters and turan news agency all says the same, they didnt retracted what they have claimed, nice try.

I read in the National Enquirer last week that Britney Spears is caring an alien love-child. That must be true also. I mean, they never retracted that either....what a slut....
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: 6th British soldier d

aeon said:
I think not said:
aeon said:
Even if karzai and unocal denied, means absotly nothing, those guys has a tremendous score of denying things. it is well documented that karzai already worked for them, that is just fact.

OK, show me the well documented facts.

The nation, le monde, reuters and turan news agency all says the same, they didnt retracted what they have claimed, nice try.

http://www.anomalous-images.com/news/news699.html

tr.v. (-mnt) doc·u·ment·ed, doc·u·ment·ing, doc·u·ments
1. To furnish with a document or documents.
2. To support (an assertion or claim, for example) with evidence or decisive information.
3. To support (statements in a book, for example) with written references or citations; annotate.

Let's try this again, show me the well documented facts Karzai was employed in some form or another by Unocal.
 

thomaska

Council Member
May 24, 2006
1,509
37
48
Great Satan
Don't suppose Aeon or any of the newspapers/magazines he cites as sources have any of Karzai's check stubs from Unocal laying around...

Loved the Jesus is Jitler link in the other posts too...that was great.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
He was certainly involved with Unocal. What his title was is hard to say.

link