Search results

That'll be my fault for not being specific then. :)

OR - you could, y'know, run the country or something.

Kind of stupid that they don't explain the difference between must offer and must carry.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-quebec-conservative-partys-freedom-platform-forcing-a-realignment This continues the idea that the conservatives are the new anti-establishment party and the libs are 'the man' that young people will rebel against. It's very unlikely that the quebec...

They did the stupidest thing you can do in these circumstances - they played along with it and tried to 'fix' the situation. That is stupid. What they should have done is simply to release a statement saying we appreciate her years of service but we're going in a different direction and...

I don't think that anyone should be charged criminally here. It BORDERS on criminal negligence but i don't think it crosses that line. But it's definitely negligence, and the family should be suing the begeezuz out of everyone and they should be held to account in that way.

I see it, and now i can't unsee it.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/feds-probe-disturbing-tweets-by-consultant-on-government-funded-anti-racism-project-1.6033599 Sigh. You had ONE JOB Laith.... ONE JOB!

Sure - so if a white slave owner got a black slave pregnant it would be a choice as to whether or not to leave the child in slavery. Not so for the indentured servant (sorry - should have made my point a little more clear, my bad). Well of your two conditions for proving that the first was...

We were discussing racism vs discrimination, not slavery or IS. And words have MANY meanings as a rule. Does "gay" mean happy or homosexual? You would seem to argue it can't be both. So words don't have meanings independent of context. The words are used more synonymously than that in every...

Actually if what you say is true then i'm right. At least for males, their children went into slavery. Unlike a slave owner who could choose to free the child or the like, the indentured servant would have no such opportunity. Not to mention depending on the time period it was most likely that...

He certainly does. He at least makes a cohesive argument and while his argument may not stand up to rebuttal it's still well made and intelligent and worthy of consideration. And i hope you DO learn from that. You clearly have much to learn :) I didn't give you any advice :ROFLMAO: - see...

Technically true but i think you knew what my point was :)

You can always tell when someone knows their wrong when they feel the need to yap after their betters after having been shown to be wrong :) Sorry your 'facts' turned out to be false. But at least now you know better.

I agree that could be true of both slaves and actual indentured servants (although an indentured servant MUST be paid SOMETHING or it's more akin to slavery) so it's not in and of itself definitive on its own. For many stretches of time that also applied to irish indentured servants. As noted...

Irrelevant. Nobody said anything about this claim. Innacurate. You can determine the bias from the opening line where they complain that its' "Used against blacks". Here's a cited article showing that your article is simply an exercise in confirmation bias...

Sure. And racism is pretty much illegal for black people too. But i'd be reluctant to say that means there isn't any.

Well that's true of course, using the state to impose a religion on people would be pretty horrible too and is part of the division of church and state. As you say, he can vote how he likes.

Well - gross overreach or abuse of powers at the very least for sure.

Well i guess that's what i was saying - there is a difference between Christianity and a christian church organization. The church and the state must be seperated, but that does not necessarily imply that the principles or teachings of Christianity should be ignored. Although truth be told i...