Search results

The planets in our Solar System spin because of the Sun spinning around itself, and it drags the planets to spin in the same direction from left to right, with the exception of Mercury and Venus: they stopped their axial rotation when they lost their internal heat, and the turn is for Earth to...

This is what they say: only postulations. Who told you there was such proto-planetary disc.. etc?

The more the planet's core is hot, the more it will get away from the sun, and the colder it is the more it will be nearer to the Sun. This is for every planet including the Earth also. The hot object attracts the cold one more than the hot one. E.g. when the Earth becomes colder it will get...

The spinning of the planet is something else than the centrifugal force: the spinning is because of the central heat of the planet making it spin around itself. The sun's gravity is getting weaker by time because the sun getting colder by time... at the same time the planets are losing heat also...

This is your fallacy. But the truth is one, so either you or the other person's idea can be true, or all are wrong. But only one is the truth, not more. Where in the world are you? In the same place: this is very clear.

In fact, the planets are getting nearer to the Sun; this on Earth has led to the increase in general heat all over the world: the Global Warmth. The earth approaches the sun So the important factor of Global Warmth is the decrease in the distance of the Earth from the Sun, by the passing of...

The planets are governed by two factors: 1- the central heat of the planet itself. 2- the heat of the sun or its energy leading to its tremendous gravity. So the hotter the planet is the farther will it be away from the sun, while the colder the planet the closer will it be to the sun. How can...

balls of wood not wool. Anyhow, the planets will not go away because of the gravity of the Sun. It means: 2 powers are working: the gravity of the sun to pull the planets to itself. and the centrifugal force repels the planets away from the sun.

Galileo as I remember thought of a missing planet in the position of the Asteroid Belt. Anyhow, the chemical difference of the asteroids in this location cannot contradict the destroyed planet; because even on Earth, the minerals are not distributed evenly, so that you see gold in this country...

This is wrong; because when I believe about God and the Next Life, it means: I believe about God and about the Next Life, so that any other belief is wrong in my opinion, or else I cannot say I believe. E.g. when you believe it is day, while another one says it is night, then you have to know...

The billions of chunks of rock are the result of the burst up planet, not that the chunks will form a planet. Quran 67: 16, which means: (Do you [people] feel secure that [God] Who is in heaven may not cleave the earth with you, [as did He cleave another earth with its people before you], so...

So you want to give you an example: to bring you the sun and its gravitational force, and the planets with their gravity!!? It is only an example.

How can you SCientifically assert this!?

What science shows that? Moreover, we have not agreed upon the planets of our solar system; what about the far solar systems!?

This is not the sure science; it is the postulation and theories, not facts.

The Swedish scientists were wrong because they compared the Asteroid Belt without considering it had been a planet in this orbit that had been broken up to form the present Asteroids in this site. The size of the broken planet is bigger than Mars and smaller than Jupiter. The mistake of...

It is not rubbish, the balls are attached to the finger by the strings, and without the repelling centrifugal force, the balls will come to the finger, and will not go centrifugally.

The size or mass of planets should have relation to their sites away from the Sun, for they cannot arrange haphazardly. And now you refer to the present convention about the sizes of the planets and their sizes: while it is about this point that we disagree.

It can't be as you said: the Sun in fact is tremendous in size it comparison to Earth or Jupiter or any other planet. The Sun is more than a million times bigger than Earth. The other notion which you mentioned about the early formation of Jupiter is only the repeating of the words of some...

It is only an example to explain the arrangement of the planets around the sun according to their sizes. And in fact, it is excellent to demonstrate how the big will go farther and the smaller will go nearer on account of the Eccentric Repelling Power.