Search results

Are you replying to yourself or the voices?

Gotta be True Dope's nefarious plan to hurt your feelings.

Thank you for that excellent example of non-scientific weaponized semantics. In answer to your specific question, no. No larger "sample group" should have been used, because this trash is "science" like Scientology. I neither fall for it nor get OUTRAGED by it. Then again, I don't live in...

Gee, maybe we're still richer, stronger, more influential, and cooler than you could ever dream of being. Sucks to be you.

Yep. Not science, just semantics. Weaponized.

ish.

Not really. Usually the majority either can't state a law at all, or pick something utterly irrelevant or inapplicable.

And in these grumbly times, it's using words certain ways to spare oneself the heavy lift of thinking.

They expanded "racially motivated" to "bias motivated" because it turns out that people are assholes about a variety of differences and groups. Nope. It's up to the legislature to criminalize certain actions and provide a range of sentences. It's up to the judge to decide where on the scale a...

"Illegally?" What law was broken?

The good people of Burma and South Sudan are asking what they can do to help.

It's their turn.

Oh, that's right. You don't border Mexico.

I have a certain sympathy for the LEO's explanation, but damned little. "When in Rome" and all that. Up to you on the pressing charges. The government doesn't actually need you to do so, they just generally won't unless you're willing to spend the time and effort.

Default position: up to their parents. With appropriate guardrails for state action if it's an actual threat to the health or well-being of the child.

We agree, and I agree it's clickbait. I also disagree with "bias motivated" crimes. The proper place for assessing and punishing motive is in the sentencing judge, not the legislature.

True, according to Worldometer. I won't quibble about counting accuracy. As to where I've been hiding, obviously neither India nor China.

Oh, you mean idiots? Yeah, they're out there, more every day. Granted, facts may have greater or lesser certainty, but there is a point at which they cease to be facts. And a lot of this is just bullshit semantics. If you have XY chromosomes and the gear, you're male. For me, "sex" and...

Your call, of course, but I urge you to press the charges. Tolerating this shit just makes it more likely.

Yep. In a similar vein. . . Article Egan is an asshole. And a criminal. I disagree with the Post's characterization of him as White. He's an asshole, and therefore pinkish or brown, depending on how carefully he wipes. That's all that matters.