Search results

He's Trump's li'l doggy. Isn't that what Canadian conservatives want?

Caption. . . Modi: Come with me and I will feed you fried elephant balls and make sweet love to you! Advisor: Perhaps is not such great idea, Comrade President.

A "bacon of tooth?" Hmmm. . . Yeah, I could go for some bacon about now.

Probably same reason everybody pities Canada for being Canada.

No, it means Donny Dipshit is hankering to return the U.S. to the 1950s, and the only way he can unilaterally raise tariffs is to declare a national emergency.

Psychotic, more likely.

New management might fix that.

Fare thee well, Mr Greene.

Probably hanging around down at the Criminals' Club having an impromptu party.

I'm not sure why, but I'm getting this weird kinda vibe that you're not terribly fond of darling Gretl.

Hell on the ol' butt-crack, though.

False analogy.

Yeah. "Seemed like a good idea at the time, judge" probably won't get you there.

Everybody in Tombstone carried a gun. Down to the OK Corral. (Ironically, that's not true. Tombstone, like many towns, had an ordinance forbidding going armed within town limits.)

Yeah, you keep thinking that if it helps you sleep well. And many cops are that level-headed. But most of them aren't going to go against whatever the official or unofficial department's (or sergeant's) policy is this week. Cops tend to see charging a person, then later dropping the charges...

A "right" the law doesn't recognize is a political talking point or a reason for revolution. If you're not willing to grab a flag and a rifle, best keep it to talking points. A brief primer on the common law of self defence. . . 1. You must have a "reasonable fear" of harm. Which means 12...

That's political too. I must note, however, that the cops "call 'em like I see 'em." There are legitimate reasons for self-defense to be a crime, most notably continuing the "defense" after the threat has been neutralized. It's not very realistic, but when you're whaling on somebody with your...

Keep changing the definition of "losing" until you come up with one that's in the same time zone as reality.

Cheaper in blood and treasure to do it that way. Seriously. Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Tens of thousands killed, trillions spent, and for what?

Here's the tough part. Cast your eyes forward. Everybody's got a hard-done-by story. The 64,000-dollar question is "What deal will cause them to take it, and respect the right of the other guys to what they get out of it?" Don't know about Canada, but that's is pretty much uncharted...