Search results

As expected, you offer nothing.. Zero.. Zip... Nada Holy crap! That's the second time today from you that I almost spit my beverage in laughing at your utter naivete Ask yourself this simplest of questions: What is the static, norm temperature that the global thermostat is (should) be set...

There are none so blind than those that refuse to see

Apparently, the last 4-6 billion years of flux is a direct result of SUV operation.... Fossil fuels is the ticket Notice how buddy has offered absolutely nothing in terms of supporting his own position? Many questions, followed-up (of course) with a healthy smattering of 'denier...

Maybe he'll point to some models or sumptin

... Just ask the researchers at East Anglia University

Dinosaurs and the Illuminati operating SUVs in the deep oceans

Hmmmmm...... That's a real toughie. How 'bout; the numerous periods of glaciation that covered continents and the consequent warming periods that saw the glaciers recede to a tiny fraction of their max coverage. That's it, that's my answer... Natural Cycles. PS - I highlighted an important...

AGW - and that's what we're talking about has no basis in fact. At present, the truthers believe it exists and demand that everyone support their instinct. In the face of the historic record, there is no AGW... That said, if you want anyone to take you seriously, back up your claim. PS -...

They would have taken a different tack if they had the easy access to readily accessible communication channels like the internet. They would have done exactly the same as the current crop of ecotards in fleecing the gullible

It's the same garbage again and again with you, isn't it? You have absolutely no argument other than 'I know it in my gut' followed-up with ludicrous demands that everyone else prove a negative. Really man.. Bring something tangible to the table on your AGW fantasy that proves your position in...

How typical. In the absence of any real argument or tangible proof, the truther coward logic is to demand that someone prove a negative.

I'm not your google bitch. Do it yourself

Anywho... I had better run... I have to shovel all the Global Warming from the driveway shortly

The facts here are that every single truther model has failed miserably... Every dire prediction has never been realized. Add in the various scandals and it's a recipe for a cult

Opps... My bad. How about I offer a thoughtful gift to smooth things over. I opted for the 100 footer

Great... Another Truther

There are just shy of 2300 posts in this thread. You're welcome to go through them all and find examples from all across the globe

Fair enough. That said, with respect to the clarity that you have offered above, is it fair to say that the existing records are insufficient to use in any meaningful form (read: geological time) to gauge the global cyclical (climate) cycles as it relates to the speculation on AGW?

So basically, there is no support then for any anthro argument in terms of climate change (again, not having any form of functional definition as it relates to anthro causation). Is that pretty much your message then?

Geologic cycles aren't measured in decades or centuries. Having a hundred years or so of data, from a small number of locations relying on varying technologies is not a strong foundation to start making statements about 'new records'. I needn't remind you that much of NorAm was covered with a...