Search results

Well, I've prepared myself somewhat for it. Like how reruns will be like new shows. Or if I'm having a shitty day I'll probably forget all about it in a few minutes anyway. I know it seems like I'm just being jokey but I have a perverse sense of humour when it comes to my own mortality and death...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

I remember when my mom first knew she had it. I was the ONLY one who was allowed to joke with her about it. My mom always loved my sense of humour although I kept it clean for her. And with her Alzheimer's I kept the jokes very light-hearted because I knew she was scared and it gave her a way to...

Well that all depends on your definition of GRS. Well that seems oddly defensive. Nope, that's just you and your bias. Clearly it was something else if they went through all the bother of cosmetic surgery and body tattoos and insisted that they identified as a dragon. Because you couldn't...

Interesting. So instead of suggesting that said individual might be suffering from mental illness, you attempt (and fail) to go for the gotcha moment. I was asking a seriously legitimate question. And I'll tell you what I'm afraid of. I'm afraid of way more harm being done than supposed good...

"Canada's back!" Yep, back in China's arms. Just like the days of his daddy.

He's defending democracy don't'cha know.

So question. Let's say some male decides he's actually a woman and goes through the procedure. Then "she" decides she also identifies as a dragon and goes out and gets the cosmetic procedure and tattoos to complete the "illusion" and states she's a dragon. And by the way, someone actually did...

I'll take science over ideology for $500, Alex.

Ohh so sorry. The correct answer we were looking for is the Greeks. It was the Greeks. Specifically Plato and Aristotle. Stupid.

Jesus Christ. :ROFLMAO: I've flown larger RC planes. (Yeah, slight exaggeration for comedic effect).

No fucknutz, this stuff is right up my alley. It's called military analytics. Well, I do know that they have more Russian tanks than they started with. Judging Ukraine's losses is a little more difficult since we don't even really know what they started with outside of personnel. Ukrainian...

*Yawn*. It's entirely possible to hate Putin AND the CCP ya fucking yutz. It's not an either/or situation. And yeah, I'm sure us "getting on Russia's side" will just turn things right around for Putin because we have that kind of power. Try arguing less like a 10 yr old and more like an adult.

I have serious doubts it had anything to do with the weight. The PA-28 has a maximum takeoff weight of 2150lbs. If the extra 170lbs was enough to make it fall out of the sky it would never have been able to take off and experience normal, controlled flight across half the country in the first...

I'm also thinking Kamchatka as well. That would give China Pacific naval ports real close to North America.

Actually, loss analysis is pretty easy when it comes to Russian armour. First off Russia has over 12,000 tanks in its inventory. It's long used its armour force as a "fear weapon" against Europe. But here's the reality. When Russia invaded Ukraine they only had about 3400 tanks available that...

Well, only nuke-wise maybe and that's because everyone loses in that regard.

\ Leve 'em there. Then at closing time shut all the lights off and crank up the a/c.

Hey man, it's not my fault the Bible and other religious texts are so full of bullshit you could fertilize a garden with them.

I used to minister spirits. Then I started drinking them.