Search results

I like both. The English version has the added benefit of me being able to understand the lyrics.

Who cares if he attends? Go further than that -- ban him from attending.

Since when is booing suppressing?

You are making assumptions about why people are booing or not booing. I don't see anything wrong with people booing someone for their political opinions. That does not make them facist dictators. Had OV actually done anything of note in yesterday's game I would have booed because of his ties...

Please clarify the below quote which to me clearly says I cannot boo Ovekskin based upon his political opinions. I will boo him for whatever I choose.

I can boo or cheer a player for whatever I choose. You can't tell me who I can or cannot boo or the reasons I can or cannot boo him. Period. Not sure what is not clear.

At a hockey game one voices ones freedom of expression with boos and cheers. They do not poll the crowed for their thoughts after each play. As a fan I choose to express my disapproval how I see fit. I traditionally boo the 4 people who do their jobs very poorly and keep getting re-hired for...

Leafs goalie is also from Russia. I was mearly reporting. But if he had scored a goal I would have booed -- my expression of free speech.

He was on the ice but a complete non-factor in the game. He may have touched the puck once. Didn't hear boos. There were several cap fans in next section about 1/2 wearing Oveckhin jerseys.

Great game. I was in the nosebleed seats at this one. John Tavares 1000th game.

Once you kill the first, the second, third and fourth are free.

My view: The only difference I see between rioting and looting would be that looting usually involves stealing stuff. Rioting is just wanton destruction. The guy breaking the window of the appliance store is a rioter. The guy going in and taking the big screen tv is the looter. Usually a looter...

Not saying he was (and I doubt he was), but even if he was, the hammer attack was clearly not justified and horrendous. It's a stupid argument or justification.

I think this was assault for assault. Don't think anybody died. Although there have been so many lately I do admit to losing track occasionally.

2 sides to every story: https://www.cp24.com/news/new-video-appears-to-show-ttc-employee-shoving-teen-prior-to-swarming-attack-1.6247506

"In this case" indicates I was talking back to the case in this thread rather than watergate. It would appear the investigation here (the CBC article) has not provided any corroborating evidence to the alleged unnamed sources.

Were there no documented corroborating sources for Watergate? In this case there likely are no sources and nobody has seen any e-mails. It would appear CBC either listened to "unnamed sources" without doing any verification or made up the sources to get the story. Should any real evidence come...

It may be on for some threads. You may have to turn them off individually.