Search results

Pussies.

So. . . somebody else defamed them? And poor little Alex is being persecuted? Well, you have a point. Did you know the shooter, Adam Lanza, was never even prosecuted?

I used to quell. Hard work, but kinda fun.

I'd say you are, in a way. By focussing on what he did not do, you are implicitly denying the importance of what he did. Defamation is not exactly a new thing. It's been part of the law for centuries. Until the 20th century, it was a crime as well as a civil cause of action.

In a different trial. Pardon him, Spamodotus, he is a TV watcher, and thinks that all legal issues are wrapped up in one hour, minus ad time. --Apologies to Shaw

The nations are in charge of IDs nowadays.

"Making reference to a true story, and making up how it should have gone."

He came across real well in Longfellow's poem too. "Based on a true story."

Correct. There's also the fact that there are laws saying what the government must and must not make public. If all this was resolved on a civil basis, there is no need (and for that matter it may be forbidden) to release any more info.

Everything from sharp sticks to starships is a "threat and opportunity." Nice to see robots have mastered the patently obvious.

Who thinks Paul Revere was a hero? He didn't even finish his ride. He was stopped and arrested. Dr. Prescott made it all the way to Concord. Decent silversmith, though.

A certain sector of the population can be relied upon to burst a blood vessel if the leading or desirable characters in fiction are presented as anything but straight, White, and male. They self-identify if you suggest that Michael B. Jordan should play Captain Kirk in the next Star Trek...

Wait, that's your standard of proof? "It's obvious?"

It would violate the Principle of Ubiquity of the Crazy Old Guy. You should have learned that in Physics class.

No, you can't. If you can accuse him of treason against the definition, why not murder? And you hate Democrats with all your soul. Are you now saying it's OK if you do what you hate them for doing. As to the foreign influence thing, it's called bribery. But Hunter Biden isn't a government...

You kids and your "groovy" and "cool" and "digging" things!

Well, THAT's a bit harsh! Sure he's not a diabolical despotic dictator? No, wait. . . a devious diabolical despotic dictator. And can you testify from your personal knowledge that his dick is a tater?

Treason, is it? At what point did Hunter Biden levy war on the United States, or adhere to its enemies, offering them aid and comfort? That being the Constitutional definition of treason, Article III, section 3.

I care! Like we need another bunch of whimpering layabouts demanding free health care!

The "known world?" To your pig-ignorant ancestors, maybe. You're right, of course, but I will carve out one exception. For the PM, the GG, or the Cabinet member with jurisdiction to apologize for some action Canada may have taken back when can be appropriate. That official is speaking for...