Search results

Yeah, we call 'em "passengers." It's kinda like when a ticket-buyer says "I flew to London" vs. when a pilot says "I flew to London."

Not at the moment, but send me her phone number and I'll give it a shot. There used to be a Fucking Creek and a Tickle Cunt Branch in Virginia, until the Church Ladies got hold of the map.

I've always understood that the quickest way to Climax, SK, is through Intercourse, PA.

Balmer? Hell, that's right up the road! Cool!

I would suggest that the mental health of the country would be well served by more reports on kid's hockey games and fewer reports on the latest lurid torture-murder.

Nah, I'll just walk up whatever road it is y'all're panicking about. Get to Canada feet dry.

DAMN, Canadians are weird!

Were that true, it would be forbidden to disclose the identity of a criminal defendant until such time as that defendant was convicted.

Whenever I see people picking up their dogs' poop, I wonder who is really the dominant species.

As do foot coverings, so apparently "getting your shit in a sock" is of ancient origin.

It is nonetheless unlawful in the United States. A fact we politely ignore, just as we long ignored the "men-only" restriction on membership in certain elite military organizations (actually, that was legal. The U.S. Armed Forces are not a "place of public accommodation). Every public...

I approve of your platform. You have my vote, and I shall donate to your campaign. Though I'm obliged to point out that ancient people, trans or not, had little access to Baggies. Basically all they had was the discarded lunch-bags of careless time travellers.

You make good points. Not saying I agree, I'd argue that protecting the identity of a victim (if there is a victim) is not as important as letting the public know what the top cop is up to. But you make good points.

I do like a good display of properly-cared-for tools! But what's that second picture?

OK, first. . . yes in the general case. The owner of a property may limit the "license" granted to visitors in any (lawful) way the owner chooses, and violation of those limits is trespass. The operative word here is "lawful." There are ways that, by law, an owner may not limit the license...

Clarification unnecessary. Whatever your role in this little dwama (or even if you've never been in such a dwama) if you're a 7-year-old boy your parents better damn well suck it up and give you a talkin' to. The locker room is a lousy place to receive Sex Ed teaching.

But are they illegal? Every once in a while down in these parts, you hear about somebody being arrested for being in the "other" washroom, usually women who got sick of the queue for the women's room. They get arrested for "suspicion of indecent exposure" or "disturbing the peace" or some...

That can be redacted. It just seems to me that hiding misconduct under a "personnel matters" cover is a little dishonest. If True Dope's government was doing it (as I'm sure it is), y'all'd be screaming blue murder.

"De Almighty says to quit changin' de subject and answer de fockin' question." Stephen, Braveheart

No sarcasm at all. It was funny and clever.