Search results

I guess my question is. . . if naughty-bits flashing, or sex acts, or solicitation are illegal in public washrooms, aren't they already equally illegal regardless of the genders of the perpetrator and the victims? And if they're not illegal, why is this just coming up now? Is the moral or...

Oh my! Somebody's terribly clever this morning!

Story This seems wrong to me. I get it when a politician resigns "to spend more time with family." Politicians are basically self-employed, and it's up to the press to dig up the reasons. And I get why the average Joan shouldn't have the reasons for her firing disclosed publicly. Even if...

So, kinda like a "Canadian astronaut."

Well, they did promise we could be anything we wanted to be. . .

Beats the hell outta me. Probably because they didn't have single-occupant, genderless public washrooms in Happy Days. I've seen some places that actually gendered their single-occupant washrooms. Never did figure out why.

"Very well, I accept your surrender." --Westley, The Princess Bride

And yet he was designated a "boy" in the first place because he had a dick.

So. . . she got to shoot a Black kid in the back AND recovered her bikini bod? What's not to love? Wonder if she's figured out the whole gun/taser thing yet.

Yeah, they're doing that increasingly in new buildings down hereabouts. And yes, the right-wingers are having conniption fits about it.

Elon Schmuck can afford it. The important question is. . . When Elon launches the world's biggest bottle rocket, is it an American spacecraft, a Canadian spacecraft, or a South African spacecraft?

If they can't hit a hockey goal, how the hell're they gonna hit that teeny-weenie hole?

A gun isn't a tool. It's a weapon.

Reminds me of the old joke about the kid who murdered his mother and father, then pleaded for mercy on account of he was an orphan.

Well, keep in mind that I'm an American, and as mediocre as Biden is, he's no True Dope. NOT that I have (or want) any kind of a say, but I kinda like Pete Poo-lover.

Not at all. I'm guilty of bothsidesism, not whataboutery. Because both sides actually do it. The funny part is you honestly believe the right is a tower of truth and justice, with nary a scrap of lying, hypocrisy, or dishonesty in it.

Excellent idea. It'll teach 'em marksmanship and, more importantly, that guns are the solution to all problems.

We'll leave that up to the regulatory authority of Dicks Canada. They'll have to consider the deep, important question "What's more important, the rights and security of Canadians, or our power and budget?" Hmm. . . no way to predict how they'll jump on that one.

Tu quoque fallacy. Surely you can do better.

That Conservatives want that? Yep, pretty crazy.