Search results

ISED.

They seem to be doing pretty good so far.

Funny, I was just thinking "It's a Diagonon symbol if you're an alt-right retard constantly looking for someone to save you from the scary dark Muzzie socialist trans GROOMERS!" Kinda like if you look at a Confederate battle flag and see anything but race hate, treason, and failure.

Well, if you let yourselves get pushed around by the dimwit activists, you probably deserve it.

Honk honk.

Sigh. You can walk from Great Britain to the Republic of Ireland.

Oh! Cool. I thought it was, like, breakfast.

Put the same limitations on using hard drugs as y'all do on smoking, probably drop hard drug use by half right there.

I'm on the Brits' side in this one. The rule for refugees is "first safe country." After that, it goes according to the various arrangements between countries.

Cute kid. And clearly a Windsor. Happy Birthday, young lady!

Of course! They're a filthy bunch. Soap and hot water hurt them.

Well. . . there's your brilliant achievement for the day!

The Dreaded Pantalomicon! Kinda like the Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan. Ancient Greek for retards.

Hmm. . . I buy it. "Diagolon" sounds stupid enough for right-wingers to think it sounds cool.

I don't know who's wrong or right in this. All I know is "fighting fair" don't exist. You're either fighting, or you're fair. Can't be both. It's also a cautionary tale about leaving things half-done. Israel took over the West Bank and Gaza, but didn't incorporate them (largely under...

I don't know. The Burning of Atlanta was pretty thorough. Sherman's March to the Sea was specifically intended to scorch the earth so thoroughly that nobody would be able to take up arms after Sherman's army had been through. It was probably the most thorough, designed destruction since the...

I'm not sure I understand the whole thing. Either Gaza is a separate, though generally unrecognized, state with Hamas as its government, or it is a rebellious province. Either way, they attacked Israel, pure and simple. We have experience with both, and in both cases we hammered them until...

I find the whole thing very confusing. The biological part is simple: most people fit into bands of characteristics that we call "male" or "female." Some seem to split it right up the middle, biologically. This simply proves that the insistence that "male" and "female" are mutually exclusive...

Nope, doesn't work. When somebody insists that there are two genders, no more, no less, and that they ae completely mutually exclusive, then a single example of a person who doesn't fit the model invalidates the model. Simple logic, old bean.

I have a question for the types who insist (with a perplexing level of hysteria) that there are two, exactly two, and only two genders, and that every single human bean who ever lived is one of the two and absolutely not the other. . . Have you ever heard of hermaphrodites? What are they?