Search results

Yeah, well. . . he's not a clueless Yank!

Sorry to pee on his wet dream, but they wouldn't take him.

OK, I read "big tits." I either need to get laid or get glasses. . .

I know you were. But Ron seemed serious to start with. I could be wrong. It does happen, though rarely more than once per. . . minute or so.

It's never a bad idea, now more than ever, to question loaded terms.

Of course it's real. It was on the internet!

Just not in TO. For once, the Men of Westernesse have a point. UT screwed the pooch, then didn't even offer to snuggle.

What difference does it make? I couldn't pick the Secretary of State out of a lineup. Does that make me unable to form a reasonable opinion on U.S. foreign affairs?

You've probably read propaganda by boo-hoos who regard everybody who has to work for a wage as a "slave." Slavery is a legal status. Nobody who can quit is a slave, no matter how poorly treated. Nobody who is not chattel property at law is a slave. Unless, of course, your sources are...

UT did the typical institutional thing. . . let 'em run wild until half the population was pissed off, then cracked down to piss off the other half. This is called "public relations."

True. It's Saskatchewan, ferfuckssake! Nobody'll EVER find the shallow graves!

Well. . . fucked that up, didn't they?

Well. . . slavery is no longer really viable, what with automation and wage slavery and suchlike. So I suppose declaring by fiat that the land they have held for generations uncounted is now "your" land, and when they understandably but violently object, slaughter them all! A few generations...

I agree with all of the above, but that wasn't the question. My question was "What is your sense of UT's motivation? The conduct of the protesters or the content of their protest?"

So. . . kill 'em or enslave 'em?

What's your sense of it? Was it their protest UT had a problem with, or their position? Had they been cheerleading Israel would UT have done the same?

Trust me, it's not. I envy the British and Canadian electoral systems. What's going on? Well, it's complicated, but essentially our politicians are running (standing) for office all the time. It's a lovely hat. I'm thinking about getting one myself.

Nice hat, Chuck! And glad you opened a new pack of Parliaments, but is it worth all this hoopla? You should quit. Those things'll kill ya.

Nonsense! They were thermo-nuclear weapons! Chinese!

Silly Hoofie! I'm an AmeriCAN'T.