Search results

Yawn.

Not to mention Chicken Little pussies like Brian Lilley.

That would violate the First Law of Journalistic Ethics. . . "Go Where The Money Is!"

Dumb, whimpering twat. "The proles will never revolt." --George Orwell, 1984

You're rather charmingly stupid, sometimes. Kinda like Goober. Mostly you're just annoying. Like mosquitoes.

Damn those Muzzie immigrants!

AAAaaand. . . nobody cares.

Colt Firearms. The worldwide quality standard. Those aren't M4s, by the way. Dipshit.

And still PM. . .

Are you replying to yourself or the voices?

Gotta be True Dope's nefarious plan to hurt your feelings.

Thank you for that excellent example of non-scientific weaponized semantics. In answer to your specific question, no. No larger "sample group" should have been used, because this trash is "science" like Scientology. I neither fall for it nor get OUTRAGED by it. Then again, I don't live in...

Gee, maybe we're still richer, stronger, more influential, and cooler than you could ever dream of being. Sucks to be you.

Yep. Not science, just semantics. Weaponized.

ish.

Not really. Usually the majority either can't state a law at all, or pick something utterly irrelevant or inapplicable.

And in these grumbly times, it's using words certain ways to spare oneself the heavy lift of thinking.

They expanded "racially motivated" to "bias motivated" because it turns out that people are assholes about a variety of differences and groups. Nope. It's up to the legislature to criminalize certain actions and provide a range of sentences. It's up to the judge to decide where on the scale a...