Search results

"Bounoua stressed that while the model's results showed a negative feedback, it is not a strong enough response to alter the global warming trend that is expected." Please actually read the source material for these mal-constructed articles and stop falling for the spin from the Daily...

The negative forcing from plants causes a 0.3 degree change from IPCC models. So change the IPCC range of: 1.94 - 4.94 to 1.64 - 4.64 Wow. What a shocking difference!

RE: Nasa C02 Doubling - you should really get the whole picture instead of posting these incomplete articles from astroturf blog sites.. "Bounoua stressed that while the model's results showed a negative feedback, it is not a strong enough response to alter the global warming trend that is...

YouTube - Dog Yawning

C02 isn't the only climate changing force.. when all other forces are in the low end of their cycles, and yet C02 is driving up temperature, anthropogenic factors are the most obvious cause of global warming.. solar cycles, el nino/la nina, irradiative warming, volcanoes and some other crap -...

Democratic socialism.

That's fantastic. Hopefully we can wane power and influence from wealthy states and divert those resources to the poorer nations so that they can have a greater influence. All of this shows some excellent foresight into today's global problems and how we can alleviate them in the future...

It was actually Obama's wife's flatulence.

Beaktros' World.

Beaktros

Hmm.. I think I know a Pat around these parts..

I never said cooling couldn't cause droughts.

Cherrypicking. It's what all the cool scientists do. Droughts - What Causes Droughts - What Is a Drought

Nope. Youtube. Doesn't count. Pat will only respond to written questions, lol

Bzzzt Correct answer was "yes"

What causes a leading question? Yes or no?

There goes the AGW emperor, spouting science as fact again.

There you go petros. Now you don't have to rely on Beakman anymore.