Search results

So you see no reason to prove inferences from data? That when experiment and models can't support a correlation that the next logical step is then to suspect the inference? So you would rather, ad populum, just assume your biases are correct? Now that is stupid.

What gets me is how easy this GW bunk would be to prove if it were true.

Good one, ad populum and appeal to authority: two fallacies in one post :roll:

Absolutely! In the case of Gore GW is definitely a political podium and cash cow. The idea is obviously that we should all walk to our factories and live in paper shacks, but not him of coarse, he is too important. I am getting so sick of this elitist filth. I long for a rain to wash it away.

I wrote one answer, saw you had responded already and edited my response in accordance. The only grievances you have are that I type too slowly or that you are too zealous in your own responses. This isn't a chat room. This is where you're wrong. You base your conclusion on an inference that...

Ah, good. I wanted to establish some ground rules with you and, I have noticed, that you will concede nothing unless you think you're right. Now you have conceded the need for experiment as proof. In this small argument you have stated the need for proof and that such proof is present. This is...

There should be a model made consisting of only the forces claimed to be the causation so the process can be demonstrated. If that was done, then I will agree.

"Finally, when the entire temporal span of the data was considered (Fig. 1B), a general declining trend in pH became apparent." Herein I do not see a reference to experiments or proofs, as you claim, but rather a justification for a theory based on correlation. Perhaps it is a good...

It is, again, the inference that I am objecting to, but I will grant that, in this case, it seems a lot more compelling than the GW/carbon correlation, but that being said, it would be good to confirm the inference with an experiment just to make sure, you know, so it isn't just conjecture.

I'm not sure if you realize this but your link isn't empirical data either. The trouble with engaging in a shadow argument, Tonigton, is that it makes you irrational and hurts your case. You see, I admit you could be right and thereby I would be wrong; now you need to admit you could be wrong...

lol, now that's funny. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Song Smith Videos: Microsoft has done it again with Songsmith and there are some really funny (and awful) remakes on YouTube.com of famous songs. You just feed the singing into the computer and Songsmith picks the music and beat that should go along with it (I think). Anyway, I thought these...

Teen Fools Police Into Thinking He Was A Cop 8O CHICAGO (AP) -- Chicago police are trying to figure out how a 14-year-old boy duped them into thinking he was an officer. The teen walked into a police station Sunday and managed to get an assignment patrolling in a squad car for five hours...

A fun little self test: Game It doesn't keep score.

SOMETHING OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS IS HAPPENING by Tim Wood 2008 December 1 I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied history all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it...

Video Wow... thank god for religion... :roll:

Nazi angel of death Josef Mengele 'created twin town in Brazil' The steely hearted "Angel of Death", whose mission was to create a master race fit for the Third Reich, was the resident medic at Auschwitz from May 1943 until his flight in the face of the Red Army advance in January...

Or gotten a bunch of you hippies to get out and push. ;-)

video I thought this was entertaining. :lol:

How much more GW can we take?!!!!!