Search results

I assumed that you were making a point for consideration such as who these groups might be and what are they doing that should not happen.

Meaning?

You tell me! I don't remember anyone suggesting that they are. But why are you playing dumb since you know what I said is the opposite to that suggestion? And thirty years is accepted as a long enough period to measure climate anomalies and say that they are climatic in nature.

Climate is a measure of the conditions over a period of decades. It is not in a constant state of change but shifts within a narrow band in that time. Weather changes, climate does not except in tiny increments over long periods of time. That is why what is happening is alarming. Climate change...

Did you count them? Are you unable to see that you support what I said? The great majority of studies of climate are done in universities and government bodies.

I don't know the answer. I never saw Blade Runner. I try to live in the real world; one that is imperilled just now by a changing climate that is not conducive to human happiness.

I do not dictate "normal conditions." Nature and the laws of physics do that. And where did I say that science has all the answers? Science looks for answers, If it had them there would be no need for further research. Gore did, indeed, do an impressive job. He brought an incredible amount of...

Climate research, taxslave, is done almost exclusively at government institutions and at universities; not by environmental groups. Further, peer review is never done at reputable and credible publications by "like minded" people. It is done by scientists in the same or related fields who are...

What a load of codswallop! Which to deal with. If you few would like to get together and provide a synopsis I will happily respond. But, the IPCC is an office with a staff of ten. It does not do science. It prepares a report from the information provided by science panels. Peer review is not in...

And, of course, nothing untoward transpired at East Anglia. All, the noise of McIntyre et al has been exposed in several; investigations for what it was. Criminal theft of information and total misrepresentation by that Steve and his fellow fraudsters. As for dramatic swings in climate over...

The reason that Tim Ball would not be "invited in," is that he is not qualified to be "in." Tim Ball might be invited "in" wrt a paper on geographical climate zones; his area is something like that but nothing to do with climate science. Even then, I doubt that anyone would trust to an unbiased...

What "one group" would that be? All those papers from hundreds of scientists in dozens of countries and journals that compete for superior material. All thosw ho have managed to convince their peers that their arguments are cogent and worth further consideration EVEN IF the conclusions are not...

Would you like all the 13/1400 peer reviewed papers supporting Climate change that have been published in the last decade or so? Or would you want to go back further to Arrhenius and Fourier or Plass? Would you also like the four or five that deny the warming and that have been so thoroughly...

Those who deny would not find peer review compelling. There is no contradictory research that is peer reviewed so it is not surprising that they would want to downplay the significance of the central tenet of scientific validity.

Lovelock did indeed exaggerate in his first book. Whether that proves to be just an error of timing is, as yet, uncertain. Of course, since this is a Daily Mail story it is uncertain whether Lovelock is really retracting his belief (belief since he has done no research for decades). Gore and...