Search results

That's a citizenship requirement?!?!?! Damn, that's one tough dress code. On the upside, pretty affordable.

Does an Afrikaaner from Joburg count? How 'bout a Libyan named Mohammed?

He's a load, for sure.

WTF is an "African citizen?"

Well. . . that wasn't pretty. The Riders surely did curb-stomp the Lions. I think Masoli needs his vision checked. He may be colorblind.

You need therapy.

The question remains. . . who was the fucking idiot who allowed live ammo anywhere near a movie set in the first place?

I do, in the sense that it's mildly amusing. Kinda like a real-life (well, as real as an internet chat board gets) Archie Bunker. Profoundly ignorant, and so insecure he needs to lash out at gentle corrections of his ignorance.

You wear your ignorance proudly.

Yes, you would.

"Shekels." Nice try though.

Just to make you cry. Worth it.

Do you mean ordinarily, or in the real world? In the real world, the answer is "either or both." In extreme circumstances, it's the state, cuz the state got the gunz.

To these types, "discovered" means "written up in a journal, exploited to make money, and/or the subject of litigation." As you say, it has probably been "discovered" repeatedly over the last 12,000 years or so.

It is, however, effective at deterring recidivism.

And one can't condemn the Israeli government for terrorism and fail to condemn Hamas for the same. Call it bothsidesism if you wish. Declaring one side evil, and not the other, is mere hypocrisy.

Cool. You get to pay his room and board for 40 years or more. Y'all should really examine reviving the great Briddish tradition of "long ladder, short rope."

We don't. That's settled law. It's called "prior restraint," and it's unConstitutional.

Hamas claims to be the government of Gaza. Can't have it both ways.

Funny, I haven't heard anything at all about Hamas investigating possible war crimes committed by its forces. . . But remember, ISRAEL are the terrorists!