Search results

you get the board you want... the board you deserve. given the chance to discuss and disagree anonymously, negativity rules here! Typically, the usual suspect default position is to demean, insult, degrade and basically create (presumed) discomfort for those who they disagree with. Attempts...

again: your inability and unwillingness to support your "documented frauds" statement is noted... has been noted, now several times.

aren't you clever... do you have anything to add to the thread's OP subject matter and related posts on radiative forcing and sensitivity? yes... you're always looking for your next one, aren't you?

oh really! Pick your moments... oh my! No worries... put up with all this crap around here... and "your moment might surface"! :mrgreen: again, there is no debate here... no chance for debate with the ongoing insult-fest and marginalization ploys. My posts aren't intended to coddle deniers...

it's called the "70s global cooling meme" for a reason! I've responded to that here with a lengthy pointed post that showcased a paper (a meta study) of all the related published papers in the 60s/70s timeframe and the positions they held. The number of papers holding a cooling predictive...

then that probably says it all! Cause there's certainly no shortage of, as you say, "poo flinging apes" around here. But wait, don't you want something... more? Notwithstanding I'm forever confused why American's gravitate to a Canadian board... since there's only a brazillion U.S. focused...

I wasn't speaking to myself alone... the response, rather, the lack of response to enforcing decorum (enforcing board rules) is quite universal on this board. It's a most peculiar form of trying to 'grow and nurture' a value-add and respected discussion board!

please... I could care less about the shyte thrown at me from anonymous posters - ya think! Since you appear to want to take this on: I'm simply asking why YOU are here and why YOU don't seem to want something more from a discussion board... something more than, again, the crap around here that...

of course it's not! That's why there's a range of sensitivity values... that range reflects upon the full gamut of published papers. its called peer-review/peer-response... you know... the fundamentals! I simply highlighted your nonsense in really, really, liking the interpretation put forward...

all you're doing here is showcase your naivety! The term denier is long established within the lexicon of the climate debate... the denier ploys to attach the term to the Holocaust are now many years old... and long dispatched. No self-respecting denier even tries or bothers with this nonsense...

you're not reading/comprehending again! As I stated, you've got an example right in this thread... the sensitivity related postings I've put forward. Of course, you haven't a clue about the subject matter, but why should that stop you from posturing your denial! As I said... as I challenged you...

sure... I've responded "with like" in the past... certainly not to the level I've ever received. Apparently, you feel it's open season and one should just completely ignore the purposeful insult and juvenile marginalization tactics played out here daily. On several occasions I've put a lot of...

that's quite the positive contribution you're bringing here. Considering you seem to live on this board, is there a particular reason you're not trying to improve it and bring a more positive contribution to it?

mentalfloss: this is a classic case in point in why this board will never rise about its juvenile shyte-house positioning, when it allows... when it encourages... this type of uber-insult posting. It truly begs the question on what this board's operator(s) and moderators are striving for here...

of course a yes or no will, as you say, "cover your position". Clearly, by your long established refusal to answer the simple question, you refuse to acknowledge and accept AGW... that sir, that is your denial. That is you, the denier of AGW. You sir are a denier. It makes no sense for you to...

keep showcasing your openess and willingness to consider a position counter to your denial! :mrgreen: ... You suggested "lies", now "BS" and "so-called science". And you think that's the approach to engage someone... notwithstanding you have no interest in anything but your own denial. You...

forget it... I'll just put you back on ignore. Be well. I've wasted enough time here today - CUlater :mrgreen:

can you actually contribute to a thread's subject matter... can you rise above the personal insults you post?

do you have anything to add to the thread subject matter?

your past posts have firmly established your denial and lack of respect for anyone holding a different position than yours... your "thinking up some lies" comment pretty much sums it up, sums up where you're at... sums it up quite succinctly! for what your past displayed lack of personal...