Search results

Try "stupid, criminal, and racist."

I've wondered that myself. If the hot areas get hotter, won't the cold areas get warmer? Vast stretches of North America and Eurasia will become inhabitable and productive. Seems like the lefties want everything to remain as it is, what they're comfortable with. Sounds kinda. . . dare I say...

Nonsense. I'm f*cking brilliant when I'm on meth.

He was clearly a violent, dangerous felon, a drug user and a bad person. And with a name like Tamir, probably a Muslim terrorist. I'm glad he's dead.

Me too. Pretty much constantly.

You expect sanity from a system based on the notion that a dirty piece of paper (or a millisecond of code) is worth the same as a steak dinner and a couple of beers, and run by politicians and bankers? That's so cute!

Yes. Money is fungible. If you have $100, and you owe $40, and your debt is remitted by $20, you have $80. Which is the exact same thing as having $100, owing $40, paying $40, and having the person you paid give you $20 back. Again, you have $80. Trust me, in both cases you have $80...

Petrosphobes have better taste.

I couldn't agree more that the system should be simplified. I've said before that in any tax code that's more than five pages, the excess overwhelmingly benefits the rich. I'd like to see a simply system of taxation, moderately progressive, and direct subsidies with clear, understandable...

I suppose that, as a farmer, flinging bullsh*t is a task you are well experienced with.

Stupider, too. There are valid reasons for climate scepticism.

Yep. You know that to accountants, money that you get and money that you don't have to pay are the exact same thing?

Why not? Beats hell out of denying the obvious equivalency of tax breaks and subsidies. Cat? Check. Pigeons? Check. And awaaaaaaay we go! Harvard University targeted by affirmative action opponents. For them, it’s the big one. By Gail Sullivan November 19 Harvard University is the...

Yep. This is real simple for most people. If the tax bill is X, and you get a tax credit or deduction from the government for your wonderfulness, it's a subsidy. Anyone who says different is selling something.

I have an idea! Let's pointlessly go round and round the mulberry bush!

Heck, I just figured you cheated on the paperwork.

The IPCC defines terms in Canadian law? Wow, they HAVE become powerful!

Good! Never reinforce failure.

So why object to eliminating what doesn't exist?

Bazinga. Or, since this is a Canadian board, le mot juste.