Search results

I imagine I will hate it, and I imagine I'll love being able to fly by flapping my arms. One's about as likely as the other. Tell ya what. How bout I just leave you alone? Hey, Boom, if I set up a separate thread for discussion of the Ukraine war, I'd appreciate it if you'd let it stand...

I hope I can offer some input to that. As a resident of the near-in DC suburbs who travels into and around Washington regularly, I frequently have my days disturbed by protests. Yes, it's an almighty pain in the ass, but I regard it as cheap at the price for the freedom. Even the big ones...

Oh, damn, I agree again. This is worrying. . . Heck the NDP set up as an alternative to the Libs. If they continue to bob along in the Libs' wake like a rowboat being towed by a warship, what's the point?

Have 'em all the time with people like Ron, Nick, Serryah, Mo, and even pgs when we're not nastying each other. Having a very enlightening discussion with pgs and Nick right now over in the "Only good leader for the Conservatives" thread. I know you can't see that, but that's on you, not me...

That was very helpful. Would the Tories consider one slightly-used chief executive? Ain't like we got any need for him. We'll give you a deal!

I'm minded to agree. I believe the original motivation for founding the CBC, aside from the "emulating Mama England" part, was sound, but it's fulfilled its function of bringing electronic media to the Canadian people. Seems to me to be a waste of money. I'd suggest either eliminating it...

Thank you. I also appreciate that I don't have a dog in your internal fights, and I'm usually arguing from general principles rather than the facts on the ground. Every now and then I think it's a good idea to clarify that.

Yep, but y'all won't listen, so why bother? People I take seriously around here, I converse with. Usually with canned, dimwitted interjections from the likes of you. Considering your input mostly consists of re-posting tweets, I don't figure you have much to offer. If I'm ever seriously...

I'm gonna stick in my oar here, with the full understanding that I ain't Canadian and don't have a say. But for what it's worth. . . I think True Dope is a lightweight. I never heard him articulate a serious argument for anything, and he displays an almost Trumpian tendency to characterize...

If it's a "useless body," why would you even care what it does or doesn't do? Oh, right. You don't. You just hear the bell and start drooling.

Do you know how the UN works? Or mostly fails to work and why?

Nice hair and the Emergencies Act to deal with illegal parking. Hey, those are accomplishments!

Hard to say whether I agree with that or not. I guess if I was Canadian, I'da been voting against, not for. Either way, I'm of the opinion True Dope was a step down.

But. . . but. . . TERRORISM! Run and hide! RUN AND HIDE!!!

I guess your information is roughly equal to your comprehension.

What significant policy initiatives or directions do you think he should have taken during his term? Again, seriously. I'm frequently a sarcastic son-of-a-bitch, but when my ignorance is impressively comprehensive, I figure asking's the best way to go. I'm not much better than most Yanks at...

What do you think Harper was? Liberal Lite or the real deal? Seriously. I liked him well enough, but I'm mostly looking at it from an American viewpoint. Don't know much about his domestic policies.

Because it's all a great big conspiraceeeeeee to Destroy Murka and ship all the li'l kids to the Sex Slave Camps on Mars!

Hey, Tardska, haven't you heard? George Washington's amphibious assault stormed the airports for freedom!

Better watch out for Dirty Lyle.