Search results

So, you're pissy about what you imagine are their luxury accommodation, and you're pissy when they let them out after a week or two. Basically, you're pissy.

Or maybe he's a coffee god.

And a fitting heir to the name Elizabeth.

The BGT tribute to the Platinum Jubilee was great!

As the one here most directly affected, Blackleaf, you have my condolences and sympathy. Her Majesty was a titan.

Neither. It's not a dichotomy. You know, Motar, your play with word-games is no less tedious than that of other posters. You do not seek clarity. You seek some sense of victory.

The ability to see and hear it happening. Same as the evidence thunder exists.

Scientifically, yes. Legally, generally no. I was dealing with Motar according to the much-easier-to-meet standard. Still fails, of course. The unanswerable question, of course, is "If there is a god, and if this god is omnipotent, and if this god wants me to believe, why has this god not...

Not you.

Long live the King. To those of you who were her subjects, you could not have had a greater Queen.

Investigation inconclusive. No way to know.

No problem. The Emergencies Act is still good law.

I wonder what her porn name is. Oh, right, that IS her porn name.

It was nice while it lasted, logic. We'll miss you. I pray to sense and reason Who's gonna save me? --Garrett/Hillman/Hirst/Moginie/Rotsey, Blue Sky Mine

Who cares? He's dead. Regardless of the poetic justice or lack of same, no one can condemn nor forgive nor understand him to any effect.

Yep. The same rights non-law abiding non-taxpayers have.

Works for me.

The term is "incel," not "intel," and it means "involuntarily celibate."

No, Motar's question was legit. There are, after all, plenty of accounts of people who report experiences with gods, angels, saints, demons, UFOs, ghosts, dead relatives, and what-have-you. Eyewitness testimony is accepted as valid in courts (as is some pretty sketchy or downright fictional...

That's not science. It's philosophy, shading into mysticism. I have seen no evidence that "metaphysical dimensions" exist except as fairy tales.