Search results

In general boycotts don't work. Not enough people are 'committed' to it. Particularly if the alternative is drinking Pepsi.

That's insane. But it shows up as a nice guilty tag on the prosecuter's performance list so that's all that matters. All lawyers are scum.

Yep. All these decisions are not made based upon what is good or right or even wrong. It is what makes the company the most money or improves the corporate image therefore leading to more money. CocaCola isn't about sitting on mountain tops singing happy songs.

Actually, if most of us did, we would all wind up in prison. While it does sound like he's getting the short end of the stick as the story is written, I just can't help but feel we are only getting 1/2 the story.

For me it was definitely the worst cold/flu I have ever had. I worked through it too (at home) but did have to stop for frequent naps.

A respirator is not good. When I got covid, I told my wife no respirator if it got that bad. Glad it didn't. I even avoided hospitalization. Hope he recovers. I will add him to my prayers.

When I was working as a consultant as a sub-contractor, the guy who was I was getting my contracts from talked to me about opportunity cost. The principle is that everything you do that was not on the clock costs you your hourly rate. If you thought it was not worth wasting that money to do that...

It's technically grey with the original restrictions of the grey zone. And yes schools will be closed over march/april break. :) But it is likely they will go back to virtual after the break.

That's not a stay at home order.

It's the vaccinations that are driving the numbers down. If you can vaccinate enough, you don't need masks or distance.

Leaving aside your opinion on last election, you think she will win the primaries? I don't really see her as an asset to any party.

Sorry, Megan. She was the one with reported ambitions to be president.

I can't see her even winning the primary.

I was simply trying to avoid the confusion (not very well apparently) by using 'biological gender' since the rest did not really pertain to my single point of my comments. I was referring to the XX or XY chromosomes present at birth. The most visible sign is the sex organs (but irrelevant to my...

I am focusing on one of the 2 biological genders a human baby can be born in. Before they make their determination of what gender they are. And I am more concerned with the level of testosterone which will help build muscles and allow the person to compete at an unfair advantage. You are the one...

So now I am a pervert? When all else fails, insult. Good one.

You seem to like to argue about this. You figure anybody who is arguing with you must have some sort of issue. You must be right after all. MY CONCERN IS ONLY THAT PEOPLE BORN AS A MALE CAN COMPETE IN FEMALE SPORTS GIVING UNFAIR ADVANTAGE. That is my only concern. I have stated it. I have...

I don't care about their junk. EVERYBODY is born as one of 2 genders Male or Female. What their 'true gender' is is not my concern. My concern is simply with the biological males competing in female sports. Yes if the are taking blockers that may reduce their advantage. But if it reduces their...

I am referring to the specific case of a biological male (the gender sex the person was born with -- i am using the term only to try to avoid the dancing around with who what when) competes in an event geared for women. They will have a biological advantage that is not fair. Now if we want to...

In this case there were 'biological males' competing in the women's competition. This is rather unfair to those who are 'biologically female' competing in the same events because just identifying as a different gender does not erase the physical advantages of your biological gender.