Search results

  1. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    Indeed! It was about five million years as the Himalays rose and brought us out of the Alligator friendly Arctic some 55 million years ago.
  2. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    Just so that you will not be unhappy and feel ignored, I visited your site. In spite of a warning from Firefox that it is an unsafe site. But, that's me! Any risk in the cause of science. What jumped out about the first graph and was confirmed when I dug up the text from its source, was that it...
  3. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    As Mentalfloss said, where do you want to begin. Pick any issue there and you can be exposed to truth. Take them one at a time and we can do it thoroughly.
  4. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    Have you not yet perceived that is is the deniers who rely on faith. That it is science taht activates the Climate change adherents.? Which is closer to religion?
  5. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    And, it is fear that brings denial. Fear and refusal to face what may lie ahead. It is a normal human condition that some of us get over and do something about it. Humans do not want to face their mortality or their vulnerability.
  6. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    Lowell Ponte was a radio and TV performer, not a scientist. Does it matter what he wrote. Scientists have been warning of the warming since around 1959. In the 1970s, following the aerosol induced hiatus in the warming - not the cooling that is pretended - there were a couple of scientists who...
  7. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    You continuously post this rubbish. I think a little honesty would become you better. This might give you some idea of the "Grant Process." It is not easy to get grants. Most applications are turned down. No matter how meritorious, there is simply not the support for scientific research that...
  8. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    Ask Levant. He writes of them. Or you could take a look at this paper analysing the question. You probably won't want to read it but you could go as far as where it says there is a large body of literature taken from such surveys...
  9. C

    Epic Anti-Global Warming Monologue

    And I thought when I saw the title that I was going to read something interesting. But it was only Ezra Levant with the usual misrepresentation. There are no scientists looking for grants to disprove Global Warming. Fact cannot be disproved. If there were such a thing as a "sceptic" among the...
  10. C

    Latest Cause of Global Warming: Milk Being Poured Down Kitchen Sinks…

    Tonington hit the nail. However, the point is worth pursuing. One other calculation made a few years ago is that the amount of water wasted by Canadians keeping their taps running while cleaning their teeth "cretaes" emissions equivalent to that of 100,000 cars annually. The message is what is...
  11. C

    Club of Rome sees 2 degrees Celsius rise in 40 years.

    And much grief to accompany it! (Reuters) - Rising carbon dioxide emissions will cause a global average temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius by 2052 and a 2.8 degree rise by 2080, as governments and markets are unlikely to do enough against climate change, the Club of Rome think tank said...
  12. C

    Death knell for AGW

    For those interested enough, here is an excellent new learning tool. Climate Change Crash Course « The Cost of Energy
  13. C

    Death knell for AGW

    That is the point, Tonington. Since I am not a statistician, I did not feel like trying to explain it, It is, though, a common feature of the denialist constructions to stretch the 'y' axis. 2002 was, as I wrote, chosen because it was one of the warmer years. That falsifies the trend. I said...
  14. C

    Death knell for AGW

    Your calling that "something of substance" on this topic shows only that you are not up to speed with it. And, I made no comment about anyone's spelling. There could be reasons for errors in that and I much prefer to have substantive converstaion about the question at issue. One reason, in my...
  15. C

    Death knell for AGW

    That is rather pitiful, bear. Do you want battles of nitpicking? Have you nothing of substance to say on the topic. And practise is correct.
  16. C

    Death knell for AGW

    Possibly you smart alecs could try browsing a dictionary. Practise is correct.
  17. C

    Death knell for AGW

    I am not going to waste time on the ravings of an aircraft engineer (retired) walter. Hs graphs are all either false of misconstrued. Every one of them and his conclusions absurd. Here is a link to a site that will explain global sea ice and the great loss of that. In both hemispheres. History...
  18. C

    Greenland's Ice Melting More Slowly Than Expected

    If only the truth were close to the headline. The studt actually finds that the rate of retreat of most Glaciers is accelerating. It does not find the overall rate heading for that tenfold increase in rate. For complex reasons, the melt is not all going to the oceans - yet. However, the lead...
  19. C

    Death knell for AGW

    From the ironically named American Thinker, no less. First, if you can explain what Yuma and Flagstaff have to do with the Global Temperature anomaly then there might be some basis for response. I don't know more about that "graph" other than it came from that comedy publication. It is phony...
  20. C

    Death knell for AGW

    Remote ensing is a new magazine that has not published climate science and is not a mainstream venue. The Editor who resigned said in his resignation that three "like-minded" reviewers were inadvertently chosen. It is also thought that the three were suggested by Spencer and Braswell. Really...